Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 2:52 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Handcranking precautions
PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:07 pm
Posts: 48
Have never handcranked an engine yet but do hang around a couple of types that have or had this type of system. I was reading about the possibility of kickback. Any tips from the experts about handcranking precautions in general or type specific.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:53 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4407
Location: Maypearl, Texas
Ober, care to chime in here.... :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:21 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Sometimes, when the mags are timed differently, you can minimize the kickback risk by starting the engine on just one magneto - the one that is timed later. But anytime that you are around an aircraft engine with a live ignition system you are playing with fire. I've seen an old radial engine with no impulse couplings fire and start and run by just nudging the propeller. Every time you touch the propeller, expect it to start and conduct yourself accordingly.

Dan

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:25 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: VT
Dan Jones wrote:
Sometimes, when the mags are timed differently, you can minimize the kickback risk by starting the engine on just one magneto - the one that is timed later. But anytime that you are around an aircraft engine with a live ignition system you are playing with fire. I've seen an old radial engine with no impulse couplings fire and start and run by just nudging the propeller. Every time you touch the propeller, expect it to start and conduct yourself accordingly.

Dan


Dan, was it a stearman??? :D

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:27 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
N3Njeff wrote:
Dan Jones wrote:
Sometimes, when the mags are timed differently, you can minimize the kickback risk by starting the engine on just one magneto - the one that is timed later. But anytime that you are around an aircraft engine with a live ignition system you are playing with fire. I've seen an old radial engine with no impulse couplings fire and start and run by just nudging the propeller. Every time you touch the propeller, expect it to start and conduct yourself accordingly.

Dan


Dan, was it a stearman??? :D



Hi Jeff,

Actually it was the Nanchang, but I have seen the Continental on the Stearman start by merely hitting the boost coil button. Didn't even touch the starter!

Dan

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:36 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: VT
I might as well throw myself under the bus. We dont have a electrical system so we hand prop EVERY TIME or we dont fly. Every great once in a while we get a SIGNIFICANT kickback but if you have a good pull through, it wont happen. Now here are 2 videos of me at our 1st start of the year in 2009 and 2010. Now mind you, in FEB I almost died and was in the hospital for a month and lost a lot of upper body strengith so the MAY 2010 video took some work. Usually if things are well, she usually starts on the 2nd try. Mags are on Both.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umDY2eqs ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruGYJlT9DSo

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:42 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: VT
Dan Jones wrote:
N3Njeff wrote:
Dan Jones wrote:
Sometimes, when the mags are timed differently, you can minimize the kickback risk by starting the engine on just one magneto - the one that is timed later. But anytime that you are around an aircraft engine with a live ignition system you are playing with fire. I've seen an old radial engine with no impulse couplings fire and start and run by just nudging the propeller. Every time you touch the propeller, expect it to start and conduct yourself accordingly.

Dan


Dan, was it a stearman??? :D



Hi Jeff,

Actually it was the Nanchang, but I have seen the Continental on the Stearman start by merely hitting the boost coil button. Didn't even touch the starter!

Dan


WOW a CJ-6.......they seem cranky every time I see one start.

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
The first time we started it by hand took us about half an hour (long enough for a crowd of fellow "airport bums" to form). After a while we figured out that the guy in the cockpit had to hold down the starter button to energize the boost coil even though the bottle was flat.

That's a good looking prop on your N3N. What is that?

Dan

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:07 pm
Posts: 48
I guess I should clarify my initial statement. I am talking about using a crank on the side of the engine to start. The Harvard has this but I think that with the inertia starter there is no worry of a kickback. I have also seen a PT-19 use a handcrank for start. The biggest danger I saw in that case was the pilot start to taxi before the handcranker was clear of the aircraft. I have also seen a Hawker Hind stert up. It had a handcranker on each side of the engine.

My original question came from reading this on Wikipedia...

"Originally, a hand crank was used to start engines, but it was inconvenient, difficult, and dangerous to crank-start an engine. Even though cranks had an overrun mechanism, when the engine started, the crank could begin to spin along with the crankshaft and potentially strike the person cranking the engine. Additionally, care had to be taken to retard the spark in order to prevent backfiring; with an advanced spark setting, the engine could kick back (run in reverse), pulling the crank with it, because the overrun safety mechanism works in one direction only.

Although users were advised to cup their fingers under the crank and pull up, it felt natural for operators to grasp the handle with the fingers on one side, the thumb on the other. Even a simple backfire could result in a broken thumb; it was possible to end up with a broken wrist, or worse."


Looks like a very important reason to only have the impulse mag on for start in this scenario. Any other precautions. I suppose having good footing is important.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:49 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
It don't matter what type of crank, just remember at all times ............that sum bitch is out to kill you or someone else at all times period.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 1:06 am 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
For handProping, make certain to have the plane tied down, at least by the tail, and don't release it until after the start.
If no tiedowns, then chock it very well.

I have never handcranked an engine, but I think the same precautions are in order. Don't just rely on brakes or a non pilot.

A prop should be thought of as a big sword, just waiting until you stick your body in its arc.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:06 am
Posts: 59
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
I've hand-cranked our Harvards a couple of times (intertia starter). If the direct drive starters have the same crank, there shouldn't be a worry about kick-back because of the way the crank fits into the starter shaft. It is unidirectional, so when you stop cranking, the hand-crank will slip freely out of the shaft.

However, make sure you start the engine the first time! Cranking the interia starter is a workout in and of itself. Make note that a small ammount of battery power is still required to engage the starter after cranking it.

Quote:
Looks like a very important reason to only have the impulse mag on for start in this scenario. Any other precautions. I suppose having good footing is important.

The Harvard has a foot peg that pulls out of the LHS of the accessory compartment.

Drew


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:40 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:41 pm
Posts: 1469
Location: North Texas
I've hand cranked a few over the years and the biggest danger outside of working yourself into a heart attack, is falling off the wing or stumbling into the prop arc, depneing on what you are trying to start. Be secure in your footing when on a wing....ie clean up an oily wing beforehand, or in the case of being on the ground, face the crank rather than be parallel to the fuselage. By standing that direction, you don't get into as big of a rocking motion with the upper body. It takes a little more finesse that way and if you accidently yank the crank clear out of the socket, you aren't going to fall over due to loss of the crank as support.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:54 am
Posts: 920
Location: Madison, MS
Hvd2Pilot wrote:
Make note that a small ammount of battery power is still required to engage the starter after cranking it.
Drew


No, electricity is not required to use an inertia starter. The inertia starters also have a manual engage lever on them. After you get the inertia wheel wound up, you can remove the crank handle and pull the engage handle to rotate the crankshaft.

I've done this many times on Stearmans (N2S), BT-13's, AT-6's and a P-38 once.

_________________
If God had wanted man to fly behind a flat motor, Pratt Whitney would've built one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:16 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
skymstr02 wrote:
Hvd2Pilot wrote:
Make note that a small ammount of battery power is still required to engage the starter after cranking it.
Drew


No, electricity is not required to use an inertia starter. The inertia starters also have a manual engage lever on them. After you get the inertia wheel wound up, you can remove the crank handle and pull the engage handle to rotate the crankshaft.

I've done this many times on Stearmans (N2S), BT-13's, AT-6's and a P-38 once.



But the gent in the cockpit must still remember to turn the switch to 'ON', otherwise the fact that he signs your paycheck means as little as his apology and he can fetch the battery cart his own d**ned self, I'm going back inside where it's cool.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group