Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 8:16 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2011 3:09 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
http://www.eaa.org/news/2011/2011-05-19_corsair.asp

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2011 3:17 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Wow.., that piece is looking really nice.

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2011 9:05 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
static or to flyable condition?

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2011 10:49 pm 
Online
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5209
Location: Stratford, CT.
Nope. Navy owned. So ground bound she will stay.

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 5:09 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
Warbird Kid wrote:
Nope. Navy owned. So ground bound she will stay.


UGHHHH......They didn't really care for them when they sold and scrapped they so long ago but now they put their 2 cents in :(

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 6:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:36 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Portage, MI
Don't be so negative. Would you rather it continued to sit on the bottom of the lake?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 6:43 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 2491
Location: New Zealand
John Ceglarek wrote:
Don't be so negative. Would you rather it continued to sit on the bottom of the lake?


Exactly right-Navy has changed their policy and are bringing them up after a decade of no action. They need support for what they have done, not a whine about it being static or not. A simple search would tell all that is needed to know about this aircraft which was discussed and marvelled at in some big threads - would have though a 'Corsair guy' would know everything about this bird already, since it is one of a kind and high profile.

_________________
Classic Wings Magazine

https://www.classicwings.com/

Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/ClassicWingsMagazine/

Preserved Axis Aircraft

http://www.classicwings.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 6:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 286
Location: Teaneck NJ
WOW that really looks great. they are working fast ! i figured it would sit for years. I guess the smell must have gotten to them. great news thanks for posting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:46 am
Posts: 140
Location: Poland
Static display has a worth of it's own. The craft may be maintained in the oryginal condition without any changes like new avionics required for modern flying. She can not be wrecked by mulfunction or pilots mistake. Usually she is more accessible for average people. It is always a pleasure to see a warbird in the air, but I surely wouldn't call static display evil.

_________________
Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 7:55 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
DaveM2 wrote:
John Ceglarek wrote:
Don't be so negative. Would you rather it continued to sit on the bottom of the lake?


Exactly right-Navy has changed their policy and are bringing them up after a decade of no action. They need support for what they have done, not a whine about it being static or not. A simple search would tell all that is needed to know about this aircraft which was discussed and marvelled at in some big threads - would have though a 'Corsair guy' would know everything about this bird already, since it is one of a kind and high profile.


i was simply saying that i would love all aircraft to fly and be in their original state. I know money,time and red tape is a hugh undertaking in any project and i thank anybody who had a helping hand in saving our history. There's no need to take a shot at a " Corsair guy" for not knowing eveything. That's why we have wix, to help educate everybody on some level. I didn't fully know the story about this corsair. So instead of your New Zealand sarcasm, please help people including myself understand the basics of this aircraft. :wink:

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 10:42 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1525
Location: Williamsburg, VA
John Ceglarek wrote:
Don't be so negative. Would you rather it continued to sit on the bottom of the lake?


It's' just what he does, John. Unfortunately, he suffers from a rare form of Internet Tourettes which physically prevents him from having reasonable online conversations.

As to the Birdcage, I'm incredibly impressed with how quickly they're moving on this... I didn't expect them to jump on it so quickly, but I'm awfully thankful that they have! I'm curious as to why they used black paint on the canopy frame, though.

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 11:30 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2338
Location: Minnesota
And one of the great things to remember when viewing this aircraft, is that its recovery is greatly owed to the financial backing of one of the great warbird owners and pilots, Chuck Greenhill (P-51 Geraldine, P-51 LouIV, Pearl Harbor J2F-4 Duck)!

It is awesome seeing the progress thus far! I'd assume, that like other Corsair canopies I have seen, the inner framing was originally painted black, so the restoration crew painted the assembly black, and the exterior elelments of the framing will be painted later, perhaps when the finished aircraft is painted, something not uncommon among other restorations I have seen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
It's looking really great. It's amazing it's that nice after clean up. And they saved the windows? That's awesome.

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Rod Schneider and 305 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group