Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 12:14 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Slingsby T-3A 'Firefly'
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:14 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
During February 2001, I went a couple of times to Hondo, TX and managed to shoot some 20 photos of the Slingsby T-3A Fireflies stored there.

I just finished scanning my photos, and this made me do a quick web-search on the status of the aircraft:

A recent photo shows the airplanes rapidly degrading.

The USAF / US Government, while trying to force the manufacturer to re-engine the aircraft (purchase them back cheaper than the price they sold them to the USAF), is letting these 50 or so aircraft go downhill fast.

This will never happen, but if the USAF decided to sell them at an affordable price, I would jump at the chance to buy one of them....


Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:28 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
There have been many ideas on what to do with these airplanes. The one I heard which is most likely is that they will be used by the UAV squadrons to allow pilots to keep their stick and rudder skills, like the old "ACES" program from back in the SAC days.

Where are the photos?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
I have the photos with me, in my computer.

PM with your mailing address, and I will copy them to a CD and mail it to you.

Saludos,


Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 788
Location: Washington State
As I recall the USAF paid more than $300,000 each for the T-3s!
That's a lot of money for a two seat SEL fixed gear plane...especailly 10 years ago.
First they overpaid for the plane...
then they lose faith after a 2-3 fatal accidents....not all of which were the plane's fault. After reading the crash reports, I came to the conclusion that the biggest problem was with the only jet-trained IP's not knowing how to fly a light plane with the skills required (it's different than flying a T-38 or F-16 guys!!!!).

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:21 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:41 pm
Posts: 1469
Location: North Texas
There were more than 3 fatal crashes of the T-3. Add on top of that at least a hundred IFE's due to engine power loss and the manufacturer coming out with a mandatory limitation on the airframe structural temperature prior to flight coupled with lousy flight characteristics and you see why the USAF dumped the T-3's so fast. Also, due to the temp limitation and the fact that they have never been able to solve the power loss problem, you will never see the USAF T-3's released to the market.
I'd be willing to bet that if they were ever used again for anything, it would be for gunnery targets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:48 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
I was at Oshkosh around 1990, and saw the first one imported into the U.S. and it was being flown by a couple of Brits. At this point I had transferred to the Air Natl Guard, and had a crew chief friend, a mechanic for American Eagle with me. The Brits told me "It's the T-3 Firefly, the newest trainer for the U.S. Air Force." WE both laughed as that was beyond comprehension, because doing a walkaround, it looked like a piece of junk. We both agreed there was no way the U.S. military would let a piston engine acft. back into the inventory, much less a foreign design. It was sitting on the line with the T-34's and L-17 Navion's and no one was even stopping to look at it. It's that "F"UGLY!
A few years later I talked to a couple of "butterbars" that had done their initial flight screening in it. I few things I vaguely remember were that it could only do limited aerobatics, snap rolls could cause tail separation, engine overheating and the aircraft were being used out west, and theree wasn't enough room in the seats to wear U.S.military parachutes, so they did their flight screening without parachutes!
I think the aircraft also has composite materials in the construction that were not suited for the U.S. southwest.

That being said, I would take one for the right price in a heartbeat, just to tool around in. I think, if possible the Air Force should put them back in the system for pilot profiency hacks and morale flights for the ground maintenace personnel. Units used to have "hacks" around for that reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group