Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:55 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:13 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Near term actions are now underway due to the risks associated with sequestration. The military can't wait any longer for the dithering going on in Washington.

Quote:
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2013 Near-Term Actions to Mitigate Sequestration Impacts

- Curtail non-readiness/mission related flying such as airshow support, flyovers and familiarization rides


P.S. It is taking a lot of self-restraint to keep my political opinions out of this posting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:18 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1662
Location: Baltimore MD
I don't have a problem with that, as long as they concurrently reduce the golf course budget for US Military Installations at the same rate. You've got to trim the fat somewhere. And hey, I also don't have a problem paying an appearance fee for a B-2, F-22, or other such aircraft at a show. As long as the money goes into paying for the upkeep of the aircraft, and not some golf course somewhere.

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:24 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The problem is that by law, the DoD cannot charge for aircraft appearances in public. This is part of the overall US Government restriction from competing directly with the private sector and is one of the things that the Collings Foundation has been fighting with the USAF over for years. They only started their F-4 demonstration/heritage flight program after the Collings Foundation won their legal battle to be able to fly their F-4, which is technically in violation of DoD rules (as it's to directly compete with a private entity with the same or similar equipment), but the USAF has managed to keep it bound up in procedural court matters at this point so an injunction has never been granted.

What it really means is that Warbird Operators will finally have a fair shake at a lot of this stuff that they've been prevented from doing for years because the US Military had been offering flyovers and appearances for free. Yes, that might mean your tickets to your favorite sporting event goes up a bit, but it also means that it might give some of these operators a chance for keeping their birds flying a few more years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:34 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
bdk wrote:
Near term actions are now underway due to the risks associated with sequestration. The military can't wait any longer for the dithering going on in Washington.

Quote:
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2013 Near-Term Actions to Mitigate Sequestration Impacts

- Curtail non-readiness/mission related flying such as airshow support, flyovers and familiarization rides


P.S. It is taking a lot of self-restraint to keep my political opinions out of this posting.



Oh Please.....don't hold back on our account pop2

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:10 pm
Posts: 887
Location: Burlington, WI
I'm not so sure that you'll see civillian owned experimental exhibition aircraft doing flyovers at sporting events, etc. In most cases this is not allowed by the operating limitations. Maybe they'll allow me to do a flyover in my Mooney!
David


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 7:52 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
Sabremech wrote:
I'm not so sure that you'll see civillian owned experimental exhibition aircraft doing flyovers at sporting events, etc. In most cases this is not allowed by the operating limitations. Maybe they'll allow me to do a flyover in my Mooney!
David


use water color when you paint those Invasion Stripes on the bottom of the airplane so you can say you don't know what the feds are talking about as you are picking up your washing supplies and stowing your pressure washer :axe:

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:24 am
Posts: 203
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Sabremech wrote:
I'm not so sure that you'll see civillian owned experimental exhibition aircraft doing flyovers at sporting events, etc. In most cases this is not allowed by the operating limitations. Maybe they'll allow me to do a flyover in my Mooney!
David


I could do the NASCAR race fly overs with my L 4 but the race would be over by the time I got to the other side of the track.

_________________
Flying Piper L4-J 45-55209


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:55 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
CAP, we've never pushed that issue in a legal manner.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:02 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Rick, I considered your group's lobbying in Congress to be a "legal fight" because it resulted in law being passed to grant you the airplane and the parts to operate it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:06 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
OOOOOOOO! As an airshow organizer I feel this pain acutely. We started to feel it last year after the USAF cancelled most of the single ship demo teams (F-15, A-10, F-16) and left only the F-22. I might point out here that Sen. McCain made a snarky remark about the F-22 having only ever flown air show missions but that is another fight. . .

Anyway, the ability for smaller shows to host a "jet team" without having to ante up for the T-Birds or Blues was awesome! We have to reoganize our business model to cope with no "low cost" jet demos. Yes, basically the demo was a free act but not really. The show had to cover hotel rooms, rental cars, and the cost of getting the milspec AGE stuff to and back from the show. If you host the U.S. Navy demo guys you also have to cover the airfare to and from the show for the gound support guys - truthfully a small price to pay for the awesome demo the show gets and I am certainly not complaining just pointing out it was not a totally "free" performance.

We are trying to rework into a more vintage warbird event with a few vintage jets (T-33, L-39, Provost, Sabre) thrown in here and there when we can afford them - I have hope that we will be able to continue to support the museum with the show and get the word out about the history here in Wendover.

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:13 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
bdk wrote:
Near term actions are now underway due to the risks associated with sequestration. The military can't wait any longer for the dithering going on in Washington.

Quote:
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2013 Near-Term Actions to Mitigate Sequestration Impacts

- Curtail non-readiness/mission related flying such as airshow support, flyovers and familiarization rides


P.S. It is taking a lot of self-restraint to keep my political opinions out of this posting.

Send me a PM and "Let 'er rip taterchip" Our fathers never had to contend with political correctness.

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 744
What does this mean for Base Open Houses? This is where we get a lot of our events.

Anyone?

_________________
Kevin Kearney
Vice President
Berlin Airlift Historical Foundation


C-54D "Spirit of Freedom" 43-17228
C-97 "Angel of Deliverance" 52-2718 (painted as YC-97A 45-59595)
C-54E/R5D-4 "Spirit of Freedom" 44-9144 BuNo 90414 (wfu April/2020)
http://www.spiritoffreedom.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:05 am
Posts: 59
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Forgotten Field wrote:
I don't have a problem with that, as long as they concurrently reduce the golf course budget for US Military Installations at the same rate. You've got to trim the fat somewhere. And hey, I also don't have a problem paying an appearance fee for a B-2, F-22, or other such aircraft at a show. As long as the money goes into paying for the upkeep of the aircraft, and not some golf course somewhere.


Forgotten-

You obviously have a burr about Golf Courses.... FYI the land is indeed owned by the taxpayers, but the entire cost of the Golf Courses are born by the MWR system.... a system which IS NOT taxpayer funded, the troops themselves fund it when they buy at the various Exchange activities.... the Exchange (Base/ Post, whatever) does not cost the taxpayer.... it funds itself and the profits fund the MWR... which also pays for the gyms, Day Care centers, Hobby shops and the like on base. The military member benefits from those activities.... and they fund them themselves....

Just thought a little heads-up was needed.

gunny

_________________
Scott 'Gunny' Perdue
http://www.eagleflyingmuseum.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:40 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
bdk wrote:
Near term actions are now underway due to the risks associated with sequestration. The military can't wait any longer for the dithering going on in Washington.

Quote:
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2013 Near-Term Actions to Mitigate Sequestration Impacts

- Curtail non-readiness/mission related flying such as airshow support, flyovers and familiarization rides


P.S. It is taking a lot of self-restraint to keep my political opinions out of this posting.


I submit that every bureaucracy, including the branches of the military, will offer up the most enjoyed, most visible items as the likely candidates for elimination if their budget is cut. Locally, the first proposed cutbacks are fire stations, libraries, and playgrounds. People scream about it and funding is restored.

Heaven knows they couldn't cut the office refurbishment for the county commissioners or cut loose someone who moves the big pile of rocks from over here to over there and back again, because nobody would complain...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
Kevin - I think you will be okay - you have a very unique "act" so to speak. I think you will find that there are a ton of people who want to see a KC-97 actually fly (me included) in addition to the C-54. Plus, base open houses usually have a large budget and can afford your fees and fuel/oil needs. I think that they (base open houses) will change by allowing the community to get heavily involved in raising funds for the event to off set the cuts in budgets. Plus I they will become more infrequent - doing a show every other year or every other third year.

My .02

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kalamazookid and 191 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group