Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:54 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:56 pm
Posts: 405
Location: Central north carolina
Hey folks,
I thought maybe someone would appreciate a heads up on a Lancaster flight. As of 1453 UTC, it is enroute from Kissimmee to Bluffton, Ohio (5G7) Currently over Asheville, NC at 11,000'.
I sure would like to be somewhere along it's flight path.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:21 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Northwest Ohio
Bluffton, guess I'll go there and check it out! :drink3:

_________________
A&P/I.A., A.A.S./Aviation Maintenance technology
Warbird salvage/recovery
One day I'll get that P-40!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:37 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
At 11000 ft? Hope they bundled up good! I don't think Lancs were ever known for their heat.

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 102
Location: Houston, TX
Y'all sure about this? I just checked FlightAware and it does indeed show N40941, a "LANC" aircraft type from Kissimmee to Bluffton, but it's a homebuilt Lancair, not a Lancaster...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:14 pm
Posts: 669
Location: Aerodrome of Democracy
As of last week , the CWH Lanc was down for extensive winter maint. checks.
In fact at least one engine was removed and the others were partially disassembled.

_________________
...it was a plane adrift beneath the moon moving serenely thru beams like an angel of the night .....fair as a song ........aloof from mortal dreams


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
An honest mistake. The Lancair's probably got decent heat at least!

Reminds me of ferrying a Stearman about ten or eleven years ago; I'd written "Boeing 75" on the flightplan and all day long when I would check in with the flight service stations and control towers people thought I was a 757!

Happy New Year all.

:drink3:

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:27 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2671
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Dan Jones wrote:
Reminds me of ferrying a Stearman about ten or eleven years ago; I'd written "Boeing 75" on the flightplan and all day long when I would check in with the flight service stations and control towers people thought I was a 757!

Doc used to use the radio call sign "Boeing 3701G" when he flew the B-17. ATC always thought we were some kind of jetliner. They told us things like, "Maintain 250 knots on approach", to which Doc would reply, "Negative, we can't even GO that fast!", and then he'd have to explain that we were a WW2 piston-powered B-17 bomber. Other operators use "Fortress" instead of "Boeing", and it makes working with ATC a lot easier.

_________________
Dean Hemphill, K5DH
Port Charlotte, Florida


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:32 am
Posts: 11
The identifier for CGVRA is AV83. Used mostly when were in USA airspace.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 1694
Location: canada
I had a chuckle over the original post.. figured I would wait and see how long it took before folks found out shes in winter mtce now... pop2

_________________
Cheers,
Peter

________


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:19 pm
Posts: 201
Location: Canada
My stepfather flew a Cherokee 140 into CFB Trenton years ago (with permission) and was charged landing fees for a C-140 (the Lockheed Jetstar variety). That was cleared up after a near heart attack.

Hope the Lancair pilot had a good flight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:41 pm
Posts: 692
Location: Palm Coast, Florida
k5dh wrote:
Dan Jones wrote:
Reminds me of ferrying a Stearman about ten or eleven years ago; I'd written "Boeing 75" on the flightplan and all day long when I would check in with the flight service stations and control towers people thought I was a 757!

Doc used to use the radio call sign "Boeing 3701G" when he flew the B-17. ATC always thought we were some kind of jetliner. They told us things like, "Maintain 250 knots on approach", to which Doc would reply, "Negative, we can't even GO that fast!", and then he'd have to explain that we were a WW2 piston-powered B-17 bomber. Other operators use "Fortress" instead of "Boeing", and it makes working with ATC a lot easier.


That's like the Saab 340. "Maintain 250 kts" "Ummmm, we'll do our best but we can give you 220." "Ah okay, maintain 220, cleared for the approach."

_________________
"According to the map, we've only gone 4 inches."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
Also watch out for "Fury" filings on flightaware. Chances are it's not the Hawker variety. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 2:19 pm
Posts: 259
Location: Hershey, PA
I have been duped by a C-82 Packet on flight aware as well. Not sure what it actually was.

_________________
Jeff


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:25 pm
Posts: 198
Location: Decatur, Texas
Sometimes a Socata TBM (smallish private aircraft) will set it off as a "Grumman" TBM, complete with identifying picture. Until you research the tail number.

JMC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:56 pm
Posts: 405
Location: Central north carolina
peter wrote:
I had a chuckle over the original post.. figured I would wait and see how long it took before folks found out shes in winter mtce now... pop2



I should have ran the "N" number. There's a clue. The only true Lancaster I know is the "C" registered.Wasn't trying to fool anybody. I do apologize to y'all, especially to cooper9411, for my false alarm and sloppy investigative work.

But guys, it was coming out of Kissimmee,... you know... Kermit Weeks... :oops: :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group