Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:35 pm
Posts: 616
Photographed as it sits tied outside on the ramp at the Alabama Aviation Technical College, Ozark, Airport, 67-15000 was the very first of the 255 T-41B aircraft built for the Army. The years and elements have not been kind to her.

Image

Image

Image

_________________
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2282629 ... ref=SEARCH

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1062859 ... 8743408401


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:43 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1525
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Seems to me that would be among the most straightforward of necessary warbird restorations, given the ubiquitous nature of Cessna parts. I'm assuming like everything else, it's a matter of funding?

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:45 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
Sadly, most aviation technical colleges don't really care about the ex-military aircraft they receive. To them, they're teaching aids , nothing more,.

The one here had a T-33, F-86H parts taken from a MD-ANG example given to a local school and H-23...plus a neat teaching rig made out of H-23 rotor system...back in the 70s, they're all gone now. Currently, they have bits of a couple of O-2s about. Over at Grant County airport they have a very nice TH-13T...but it doesn't fly along with bits of H-13 wreckage and a stripped non-flying Huey.

A local Church-sponsored aviation school has a ex-Army U-21...a non pressurized King Air as a trainer. they teach students how to maintain PT-6s with it. It's still in its Army colors, but someone has painted its windows so they look round, giving it the look of a King Air. It looks to be in great shape.

Few of these aircraft will ever be restored or valued as warbirds. For many, it's just a decades long delay to the scrap yard.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
A Mescalero wouldn't cruise at "148 mph" if you dropped it out of a C-130.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:35 pm
Posts: 616
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:
A Mescalero wouldn't cruise at "148 mph" if you dropped it out of a C-130.



Here is the chart at 7,500, you would have to get to 9,500 to see 147 mph. My T-41B is a little faster than my C-177B 180 hp Cardinal was. I flight planed 140 mph on it. The T-41B is a lot faster than a normal 172 due to the 210 hp and constant speed prop.

Image

_________________
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2282629 ... ref=SEARCH

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1062859 ... 8743408401


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: flyingsailor and 63 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group