Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 3:44 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 12:32 pm
Posts: 198
Originally posted by Mark Allen

Per request (most of you have seen these before so sorry here ya go again).... A few interesting ideas for sure.
Wiki below states a little what's what with each type.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consolidat ... _Liberator

Image
B-24A/LB-30B Ordered in 1939, the B-24A was the first production model. Due to the need for heavy bombers, the B-24A was ordered before any version of the B-24 flew.
The main improvement over the XB-24 was improved aerodynamics, which led to better performance. Some sent to Great Britain under Lend-Lease as LB-30B.
(Total: 20 LB-30B; 1 B-24A) (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
Consolidated LB-30 (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
YB-24/LB-30A Pre-production prototypes. Six examples were sent to Great Britain under Lend-Lease, designated LB-30A. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
XB-24N A redesign of the B-24J, made to accommodate a single tail. It also featured an Emerson 128 ball turret in the nose and a stationary tail gunner's position.
While 5,168 B-24Ns were ordered, the end of the war resulted in cancellation of all contracts before production could begin. (Total: one) (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
Consolidated XB-24N (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
XB-24K Developed from the B-24ST, with the B-23 Dragon empennage replaced by the tail of a Douglas C-54 Skymaster.[34]
The improved performance and handling of the B-24ST and XB-24K led to the decision to incorporate a single tail in the PB4Y-2 and B-24N.
(Total: one converted B-24D) (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
Consolidated XB-24K-FO modified from a B-24D-40-COS (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
Consolidated XB-24K-FO modified from a B-24D-40-COS (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
Consolidated XB-24J with B-17 nose section, containing chin turret, grafted on; modification not adopted for production. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
The Consolidated XB-41 Liberator was a single Consolidated B-24D Liberator bomber, serial 41-11822, which was modified for the long-range escort role for
U.S. Eighth Air Force bombing missions over Europe during World War II. (U.S. Air Force photo)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consolidat ... _Liberator

Image
Consolidated XB-24 cockpit, taken in 1945 after the conversion to XB-24B. (U.S. Air Force photo)

_________________
WIX_Archive posts sponsored by:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:07 am
Posts: 282
Location: Grosse Pointe, Michigan
XB-24N A redesign of the B-24J, made to accommodate a single tail. It also featured an Emerson 128 ball turret in the nose and a stationary tail gunner's position.
While 5,168 B-24Ns were ordered, the end of the war resulted in cancellation of all contracts before production could begin. (Total: one) (U.S. Air Force photo)

It appears this aircraft is actually the XB-24K due to the retention of the original J-style tail turret. As stated elsewhere, the N-models were to have used a conventional (stationary) tail gun mount.

_________________
Daviemax
Researcher of Post-War B-17 History
Maintains database of B-17s used from 46- on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 3:01 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7821
Thx for seeing that error, I put the wrong info under the wrong photo. again! (how could that ever happen to me :wink: )

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:33 am
Posts: 474
amazing that the plane in your first picture is not only still with us but still flying....that's diamond lil :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:42 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
the b-24 w/ the grafted b-17 nose & chin turret definetely adds alot more sex appeal to what was otherwise a very boxy / frumpy looking fuselage. wonder why that experiment didn't pan out?? even though the 24 was faster than the b-17 in general, i think that configuration would have boosted the 24's performance even more with the sleeker aerodynamic lines.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 8:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:19 pm
Posts: 201
Location: Canada
The B-17 nose does look neat on the front of the B-24, but I have to ask, why was it considered in the first place?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:02 pm
Posts: 302
As a child, I saw a photo of the -24 with the -17 nose in my father's copy of William Green's "Famous Bombers of the Second World War". Ever since then, I've been sure it was just a photo-retouching job. Now I know better...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
PropsRule wrote:
The B-17 nose does look neat on the front of the B-24, but I have to ask, why was it considered in the first place?


It was an attempt to increase the forward defensive firepower. The B-24 didn't have a nose turret until the G and H models, just flexible mounts, so the graft was made using a B-17 with Chin Turret. The XB-41 shows a much more rational approach :D

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Is the nose turret used on the XB-24N the same one used on the B-32?

The photo of the immortal AM-927 is interesting. She obviously has the transport mods and the very late windscreen, but appears to still retain the waist gun hatches. I think every picture I've seen of her during the war years shows a different configuration. They must have been making mods constantly.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:56 am
Posts: 843
B-24D's were field modded here in Australia to incorporate a tail turret into the nose. Looks like a J...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:07 am
Posts: 282
Location: Grosse Pointe, Michigan
Regarding the B-17 nose on the B-24, I believe this modification was done at Eglin. One side benefit to the mod (whatever other attributes it may have conferred) was a common navigator/bombardier station between B-17's and B-24's. However, making this change on the production lines would have been very disruptive. From mid-war on frequently very good improvements were rejected due to the pressure on individual aircraft unit production (witness P-38K, which would have been a significant performance improvement but the engine and propeller change required a new cowling, the cost of which was an estimated two-week loss of production).

_________________
Daviemax
Researcher of Post-War B-17 History
Maintains database of B-17s used from 46- on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:54 am
Posts: 314
The aircraft in the third pic is an early production B-24D.

Duane


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:25 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7821
gemmer wrote:
The aircraft in the third pic is an early production B-24D.

Duane


Not doubting you as I'm no expert on B-24 types. Photo states this:

Consolidated YB-24 built (S/N 40-697). This aircraft was sent to the RAF as an LB-30A Liberator I (s/n AM259). She was destroyed in a mid-air collision with a Soviet DB-7, which was a lend/lease A-20 Havoc. (U.S. Air Force photo)

As for the XB-24J? Reminds me of a 'moose'

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 871
Location: Midland, Texas
Mark - my resources show that 40-0697 was one of six YB-24s sold to the British as LB-30As. If you search on the s/n there are references showing it as a B-24D but I don't think they are correct. I could be wrong.

Randy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:40 am
Posts: 987
Speaking of B-24 nose turrets, I've got a book on the 90th BG 'Jolly Rogers' and they were on the leading edge of nose turret development. In the field they grafted the tail turret of a B-24 onto the nose. I always thought that would be an interesting kit bash of the Monogram B-24 kit.


Chappie

_________________
Brrring. Dispersal? TWO SECTIONS SCRAMBLE!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group