Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jul 13, 2025 7:23 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 2:05 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
https://www.facebook.com/CavanaughFligh ... =1&theater

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 2:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:40 am
Posts: 987
Gorgeous. Is this the one that was in VNAF colors? Are these new colors historically correct for the airframe?

Chappie

_________________
Brrring. Dispersal? TWO SECTIONS SCRAMBLE!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 2:28 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5211
Location: Stratford, CT.
Looking Great!

Image
Added here for the Facebook impaired. :wink:

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 2:42 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Atlanta, GA
Courtesy of WIXer SIDSIKO, here is 135152's operational history; VAW-12 is most appropriate:

AD-5W, 135152 accepted on charge, El Segundo, 28 Sep 1955.
O&R Norfolk, 9 Oct 1955.
O&R QP, 31 July 1956.
VAW-12, QP, 26 Nov 1956.
VAW-12 Det 33, abd Intrepid, 6 July 1957.
VAW-12 Det 42, abd Forrestal, 1 Nov 1957.
VAW-12, QP, 6 Nov 1957.
VAW-12 Det 33, abd Intrepid, 21 May 1958.
VAW-12, QP, 19 Aug 1958.
O&R QP, 27 Aug 1958.
VAW-12, QP, 26 March 1959.
VAW-12 Det 38, abd Tarawa, 25 Apr 1959.
VAW-12, QP, 6 May 1959.
VAW-12 Det 52, abd Valley Forge, 29 June 1959.
VAW-12, QP, 27 Aug 1959.
VAW-12 Det 38, abd Tarawa, 10 Sep 1959.
VAW-12, QP, 6 Oct 1959.
VAW-12 Det 48, abd Wasp, 19 Oct 1959.
VAW-12, QP, 20 Nov 1959.
VAW-12 Det 38, abd Tarawa, 27 Nov 1959.
VAW-12, QP, 14 Dec 1959.
VAW-12 Det 34, abd Champlain, 21 Jan 1960.
VAW-12, QP, 31 Jan 1960.
VAW-12 Det 52, abd Valley Forge, 12 March 1960.
VAW-12, QP, 21 March 1960.
VAW-12 Det 52, abd Valley Forge, 27 April 1960.
VAW-12, QP, 18 May 1960.
VAW-12 Det 34, abd Champlain, 4 Nov 1960.
VAW-12, QP, 9 Dec 1960.
O&R QP, 23 Dec 1960.
VAW-11, San Diego, 19 May 1961.
VAW-11 Det Q, San Diego, 1 Dec 1961.
VAW-11, North Island, 1 Aug 1962.
NAS Memphis, 22 Feb 1963.
SOC by the Navy next day, used as a training aid

A very nicely finished VAW-12 EA-1E model may be seen here: http://www.modelerv.com/AD5W_page.htm

Image

Image

Some of her sisters ...
Image

Image

Since I'm more of an Air Force A-1 history buff, I asked a good friend who flew A-7's in the Navy to explain the 2-letter tail code differences to me ... here is his response, edited for clarity.

"Those letters are indicative of the airwing to which the squadron is assigned. My old squadron was attached to Airwing One embarked aboard USS America. Our tail letters were AB. When the squadron was reassigned to Airwing Seven (not a normal event but occurs when the ships enter drydock or refit periods) the letters were changed to AE. All of the aircraft attached to that airwing have the same letters. Carrier borne squadrons were never split amongst airwings in my day and I do not think they did earlier. They would have just been a small squadron. Our E-2 Hawkeye squadron had only four aircraft. Our EA-6B squadron also had only six where the normal squadron had 12-14 planes. Back in the time of the Skyraider, we had many smaller carriers vice the much fewer in number large "supercarriers" common today. Having many airwings does not surprise me. I assume there would have been fewer of this airframe modification so they would have wanted to keep the operational versions at sea as much as possible. The pilots could have been kept current ashore with a generic version of the plane since the mission does not require any specific manuvering which would have required currency. The 703 on the cowl would have been the number in the squadron. We had 13 A-7E's which were numbered 300-312. Tradition dictates the 00 bird have the CAG's name (before everyone went TPS gray) and a special highlight to the paint scheme. This was often the "Sunday go to meeting" scheme and was commonly the more photographed bird for publicity. 301 had the skippers name and 302 the XO."

Ken

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 359
Location: Ocala, Florida
Chappie wrote:
Gorgeous. Is this the one that was in VNAF colors? Are these new colors historically correct for the airframe?

Chappie



Chappie - I believe your thinking of the one owned by Jim Slattery out on the west coast... This bird here has always been grey over white - had "HA" on the tail and "152" on the cowling...
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:33 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:21 pm
Posts: 1329
Location: Dallas TX
The new scheme is accurate for that airframe. Very cool.

_________________
Taylor Stevenson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:42 am
Posts: 450
I spoke with the historian of VAW-12. VAW-12 had approx 44 AD5 aircraft. They would be "detached" to a carrier in groups of 4 or 5 and carried different two letter codes on each detachment. He didn't give me a standard for the use of letters. They had an Italian sailor in the group who spoke no English . He hand painted the Bats on the tails of all of the planes while they were ashore at Quonsit point in mid 1958. The group also used NE, AJ, AK, during these years.

_________________
Image
Blue Skies,
Doug


www.cavanaughflightmuseum.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
Wouldn't it be cool if they could come up with the big "guppy" radar pod for it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:42 am
Posts: 450
Snake45 wrote:
Wouldn't it be cool if they could come up with the big "guppy" radar pod for it!

I've thought about that!

_________________
Image
Blue Skies,
Doug


www.cavanaughflightmuseum.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 7:27 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Atlanta, GA
I meant to include this nugget, actually from Wikipedia: "In Carrier Air Wing tail codes, the first letter denotes which fleet the Air Wing deploys from; A for Atlantic Fleet and N for Pacific Fleet."

Might take a touch more rudder trim with that fresh paint on the tail. :wink: Looking great!

Ken

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 683
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Ken wrote:
I meant to include this nugget, actually from Wikipedia: "In Carrier Air Wing tail codes, the first letter denotes which fleet the Air Wing deploys from; A for Atlantic Fleet and N for Pacific Fleet."

Ken

I actually knew that much already, but then I referred back to the first B&W photo of Bu no. 9567 which has "airwing" code GE on its tail and squadron number 715.
Guess that would be the Great Lakes fleet, huh? :wink:

_________________
“To invent the airplane is nothing. To build one is something. But to fly is everything!” - Otto Lilienthal

Natasha: "You got plan, darling?"
Boris: "I always got plan. They don't ever work, but I always got one!"

Remember, any dummy can be a dumb-ass...
In order to be a smart-ass, you first have to be "smart"
and to be a wise-ass, you actually have to be "wise"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 2:49 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Atlanta, GA
This link opens a .pdf; pages 13-14 list the Navy tail codes 1964-1975. Although a couple years behind the EA-1E, the codes appear to be unchanged.

http://www.history.navy.mil/avh-1910/APP26.PDF

This list also shows some exceptions. VAW-12, according to Wiki, was re-designated CAEWW-12 (its own wing) and, finally disbanded and absorbed into VAW-123 in 1967. The detachments seemed to have their own unique tail codes which may have been, as my earlier post alluded, due to the fact that only 4 or so EA-1E's would deploy to a small carrier and not be "owned" by the air wing.

http://a4skyhawk.org/2e/navy-tail-codes.htm

and this reference ...

http://www.history.navy.mil/avh-1910/app23.pdf

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:42 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
the exhaust stains always makes a skyraider sexy!! they convey the brute strength of the engine

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:58 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4411
Location: Maypearl, Texas
FG1D Pilot wrote:
Snake45 wrote:
Wouldn't it be cool if they could come up with the big "guppy" radar pod for it!

I've thought about that!


Would make a great luggage rack...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:18 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
Lynn Allen wrote:

Would make a great luggage rack...



I have to admit my brain took a different line of thought.

Image


Whole lotta' breweries in Wisconsin... whole lotta' thirsty Texans...


Just sayin'...

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group