Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 12:48 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: B-29 kee bird questions
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 1:23 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
I was watching the documentary again and just began to ponder some questions about the recovery project. The task at hand was one of the most daring and honorable I can say I know about. My main question is simply this.......why?

Why wasn't kee bird disassembled as much as possible and flown to a better location to be restored? Taking such a risk as flying a b-29 with parts, gauges and wiring that were 50+ years old seems like a bad risk,( from a pilots view.)
A brand new b-29 that rolled off the assembly line can take 5,000 feet of actual runway where here they mention they would have 2,000 feet of ice. And lots of mud and soft ground too. Again, if I was looking at it from a pilots point of view I would not have the nerve.
And then as the winter approached the engines or cockpit were not shrink wrapped to protect the new parts. As they embark back in the spring it mentions snow and moister had gotten inside the engines possibly creating the oil leaks.

I guess I'm looking as to what more precautionary measures should have been taken to possibly help prevent what happened?

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 1:44 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2923
whistlingdeathcorsairs wrote:
I guess I'm looking as to what more precautionary measures should have been taken to possibly help prevent what happened?


Replacing the pallet of beer with a fire extinguisher or two may have led to a different outcome...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 1:53 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5210
Location: Stratford, CT.
What would it take to get the B-29 out of there disassembled? Two routes come to mind quickly.

1. By Cargo Aircraft (C-130/C-5/etc.)
2. By Helicopter

Both would have be daunting and expensive.

Option 1 would probably have not worked unless they were disassembling the 29 in the Summer and planning on loading it in the winter when the ground was hardened. The C-7 Caribou dug into the soft earth during the Summer. Imagine a C-130 trying to land there! So it would be feasible MAYBE in the winter. But those winters are not easy. Again, this plan would have weighed heavily on the Air Force helping out. Or some heavy cargo charter company.

Option 2 could have been executed exclusively in the Summer (albeit short) but would have been more time consuming and hair raising. Darryl Greenamyer would have to charter one to two heavy lift helicopters for this. And then sling the large pieces all the way back to Thule. Which isn't close by any means.

In my opinion, considering the shear remoteness of the plane, the expense, and overall effort, Darryl saw the chance at flying the B-29 home as the most logistically reasonable. Not to mention the most exciting and adventurous I'm sure.

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:07 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
But in the end a man passed away and trying to fly the b-29 cost the whole project. Everybody knows that a superfortress had it's issues with fires. The engines, props, landing gear and turrets all could have been flown out. The fort could have been disassembled to some degree until something bigger could have gotten it out. It wasn't going anywhere.

Good thinking as to why there wasn't more fire extinguishers located in each compartment with a guy

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:36 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
I love all these monday morning quarterbacks who were not there, or have no idea what was going on, woulda, shoulda coulda all you want, you were not there, you did not make the call.

Kee Bird burned because of a accident in that the APU operator did not shut it off like he was supposed to, Rich died because he refused medical treatment until it was too late, who's fault is that ? Rick did not know how bad he was hurt and continued to work for several days.

If Kee Bird had flown out everyone would be saying it was the greatest recovery in warbird history, but because it didn't everyone thinks they were fools for trying.
I was not there, but I know what happened from someone who was close to those that were.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:57 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1595
Matt Gunsch wrote:
I love all these monday morning quarterbacks who were not there, or have no idea what was going on, woulda, shoulda coulda all you want, you were not there, you did not make the call.

Kee Bird burned because of a accident in that the APU operator did not shut it off like he was supposed to, Rich died because he refused medical treatment until it was too late, who's fault is that ? Rick did not know how bad he was hurt and continued to work for several days.

If Kee Bird had flown out everyone would be saying it was the greatest recovery in warbird history, but because it didn't everyone thinks they were fools for trying.
I was not there, but I know what happened from someone who was close to those that were.


Matt - 100% agree. Too many experts after the fact out there!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1131
Matt Gunsch wrote:

Kee Bird burned because of a accident in that the APU operator did not shut it off like he was supposed to.


The APU was the power source for the hydraulic pump that runs the brakes. From the very first B-29 until "FIFI" was modified with extra batteries, it was standard operating procedure to have the APU running and on line from engine start until after takeoff and again from before landing until the chocks were in place on the ground. It had to be running. There was no other option because the plane was built that way. The gas can that was being used to feed the APU came loose and hit the APU exhaust. That is why the fire started.

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 3:13 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Not knowing the dimensions off the top of my head, I'm not sure that a B-29 fuselage would even fit in the back of a Herc. I think the diameter would be too large. Flying it out on it's own steam was probably the only realistic way to get it out of there without spending literally millions.

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 3:29 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Pacific Northwest USA, via North Florida
It boils down to these three points:

1. A dream to get the plane back to the US
2. Very limited money to support said dream
3. So, therefore, both led to a substantial gamble (to fly the plane out) that simply didn't work out.

The irony is that the B-29 wouldn't have left Thule once it got there, at least not for a very long time at the best. I know a now-retired USAF officer who was at the base HQ at the time and he swears the plane was going to be grounded the moment it rolled up to their hangars once it got there and that there was a plan (obviously not shared with the public) in place to assure it never left Greenland.

_________________
Life member, 91st BG Memorial Association
Owner, 1944 Willys MB #366014
Former REMF (US Army, O3)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 4:21 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Northwest Ohio
p51 wrote:
It boils down to these three points:

1. A dream to get the plane back to the US
2. Very limited money to support said dream
3. So, therefore, both led to a substantial gamble (to fly the plane out) that simply didn't work out.

The irony is that the B-29 wouldn't have left Thule once it got there, at least not for a very long time at the best. I know a now-retired USAF officer who was at the base HQ at the time and he swears the plane was going to be grounded the moment it rolled up to their hangars once it got there and that there was a plan (obviously not shared with the public) in place to assure it never left Greenland.


How could it not leave Greenland if Larkin's/ Greenamyer had all permits and paperwork?

_________________
A&P/I.A., A.A.S./Aviation Maintenance technology
Warbird salvage/recovery
One day I'll get that P-40!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 4:28 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
Thanks Matt for the positive info. Don't think anybody claimed to be an expert and since you and I both were not there that levels the playing field. All I was asking was some insight or different plans which might have been a safer option. Now I remember why I left wix :roll:

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 4:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Although a disappointing end result, I always thought it was a fantastic and courageous attempt to recover that plane. What a sight it would have been flying into Thule where I'm sure it would have received a tumultuous welcome from the base personnel and had a thorough inspection and fine-tuning from Greenamyer's crew before departing for the states. I doubt Thule was a quick "gas-n-go" for the plane without some additional work in a warm hangar.

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 4:46 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
How far was Thule from the lake?

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 4:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:37 pm
Posts: 672
Brad wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:

Kee Bird burned because of a accident in that the APU operator did not shut it off like he was supposed to.


The APU was the power source for the hydraulic pump that runs the brakes. From the very first B-29 until "FIFI" was modified with extra batteries, it was standard operating procedure to have the APU running and on line from engine start until after takeoff and again from before landing until the chocks were in place on the ground. It had to be running. There was no other option because the plane was built that way. The gas can that was being used to feed the APU came loose and hit the APU exhaust. That is why the fire started.


That, and the decision to jerry-rig a clumsy bypass for the faulty fuel pump on the APU instead of making arrangements to replace it.

_________________
"They done it, they done it, damned if they ain't flew." December 17, 1903


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 5:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:39 am
Posts: 120
Here is some insight on what happened to he Kee Bird, directly from one of the members of the expedition. It was posted on the usenet newsgroup rec.aviation.millitary in 1996.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searc ... 9ENwJEFVoJ

Quote:
I read with interest all of the posting to this news group about the
ill-fated B-29 Kee Bird recovery expedition. Many saddened me. As you might
recall about 1 1/2 years ago I posted to this news group a story about the
1994 Kee Bird recovery expedition. My brother-in-law, Bob Vanderveen, was
one of the few "lucky" people have gone on that expedition and the 1995 one.
He nearly died in the tragic fire that consumed the B-29. Perhaps the one
item which saddened me the most about many of the posts was the reoccurring
theme that the expeditions were poorly planned. Nothing can be further from
the truth. They didn't just hop over to Greenland one day after having a
cold one on the back porch in California with the thought of simply dumping
a bit of fuel into the Kee Bird, kicking over the engines and flying the
bird back to the States. Come on, just think a moment about the logistics
of the expeditions for just a moment. (By the way, I don't purport to be
an expert as to what happened during the trips nor am I a real aviation
enthusiast)
- They had to find, buy, rebuild and test four B-29 carbureted engines.
They did this work in Ramona, California many, many months before the
summer 1994 trip. Bob and a number of others spent many long hours for
months attending to those engines. Spare parts are not in plentiful
supply for B-29s.
- They had to build and scrounge up an incredible amount of parts,
supplies and tools to take back with them to Greenland, including a
crane, bulldozer, propellers, cables, tires, bomb-bay doors, food for
6-8 weeks...
- They had to plan with Thule Air Force Base to allow them use the base
for part of their operations.
- Only one barge per year goes between North American and Thule.
The four rebuild engines along with a lot of the other parts had to
get on it. This stuff had to get loaded on trucks and carted to the
east coast in time for the barge departure. This had to be done
months before they would get to Greenland in 1994.
- ...

It should go with out saying that this required a lot of planning on
Darryl Greenamyer's part.

As to the donation argument, even after all the press about the 1994
exhibition, they couldn't even find even one donor to give them the
necessary clothing for the much colder 1995 mission. Each member had
to buy their own equipment.

With that said, here's a little from what my brother-in-law told me
about the last mission. (It's been awhile since he told me this story,
so some of the info might not be completely accurate. Also, Bob hasn't
wanted to talk about it too much.)

Bob was one of the four people on the Kee Bird during its last run.
He was stationed in the rear of the plane. While the plane was moving
down the bumpy, icy runway on top of the frozen lake, a lot of dust
swelled up inside the plane and in the rear cabin from the years of
dirt that accumulated in every nook-and-cranny of the plane. He quickly
realized that he had forgotten to wear his goggles and decided to go to
the middle of the plane to search for them. That's when he discovered the
APU was on fire. When he went to get the goggles, he had to leave the
headset for the intercom to the cockpit in the rear cabin. Once
he saw the fire, he knew he had to alert Darryl, Al Hansen and Thad
Dulin in the cockpit. In a matter of seconds the already dust filled
rear part of the plane became densely filled with thick, black smoke.
Bob had to feel his way back to the rear cabin, scrounge around for the
headset and with what little breath he had left, yell FIRE into mic.
He then had to run back through the smoke, breathing in a number of lung
numbing mouthfuls of the acrid smoke, and tumble out through the bomb-bay
doors onto the harsh ice. Meanwhile, as Darryl, Hansen and Dulin were
scrambling to try to get out of the cockpit hatch, one of them discovered
that their quick-release seat buckles didn't want to release. Another was
quick enough to find a rod and helped to pry the buckle open. Within
moments after Bob popped out the plane, the tail fell off and a few
more moments later after the cockpit crew jumped to safety, the fuselage
was fully involved. The plane continued to burn for hours.

From what it sounds to me, fire extinguishers would have had no effect.
By the time Bob saw the fire, it was already far too advanced to do
anything. Perhaps if they had a firefighter, in full turnout gear and
wearing a SCBA in front of the APU, they might have had a chance...

From what I understand, nothing was worth salvaging after the fire.
My brother-in-law had nearly $10,000 worth of tools, gear and camera
equipment burn up on the plane. He was sleeping on board the plane at
night since his tent somehow didn't arrive in Greenland and so he had
everything in the plane. He completely volunteered on the exhibitions,
while my sister had to work double duty at their Ramona Cafe Restaurant
in Ramona, California while worrying about her husband's safety in
Greenland.

I hope this gives a bit more insight as to what happened during the Kee
Bird recovery mission and that being an armchair coach in a warm 70 degree
home makes it easy to criticize the work of a few brave people out in a
desolate place a few hundred miles from the north pole and in sub-zero
degree weather trying to recover a 43-ton plane. Take it apart, yeah
right. I'm happy that there are still a few people willing to take on
incredible risks.

Perhaps, the one post about the Recovery effort that got me the most
was the one from the "SR-71 Flying Qualities Lead Engineer". I would have
thought that Darryl Greenamyer, having been one of the first test pilots
of the SR-71 while at the Lockheed Skunk Works, would have deserved a
little more respect from such a person. I'm sorry if I misunderstood the
intent of her posting. Here is a section of her post:

"They're going to have to get someone else to find it for them. The
guy who found this one, Giles Kershaw, was killed in Antarctica,
flying a photo/support gyrocopter for a group of folks about as good
as the B-29 "rescue" team. I knew Giles from when we went down to..."

Again, I apologize if she really didn't mean to "put down" the rescue
mission.

A few other things:
1. Darryl received permission from Denmark to extract the plane. It was
not there simply for the taking.
2. The location of the plane was well known. The B-29 was supposed to
have been destroyed right after the plane crash landed and its
crew rescued in 1947, but for some reason the orders were never
carried out. If they were, all of this would have been a mute point.
3. The Caribou wasn't chosen for its looks. It had to be able to
carry a large payload and land and take-off on a short (about 1500')
loose dirt/muddy runway.
4. The original engines, which are the late model, fuel-injected versions,
and removed during the 1994 effort, are (I believe) in California. So,
yes, something from the original bird is still around.

Regards,
Stefan Steiner
ste...@concentric.net (soon to be cancelled: sste...@netcom.com)
http://www.concentric.net/~stefans


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 234 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group