Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 11:23 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:21 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
Quote:
BigGrey

Post subject: Re: Evergreen, Erickson, and Collings Foundation in the news

When did they quit flying those warbirds and park them for good? I was at the El Toro Airshow in 1996 when Spitfire TE356 had the gear collapse. I don't remember seeing any of them at airshows a year or two after that.
The registry lists the gear collapse as Long Beach CA but I'm sure it was MCAS El Toro.

Les


I am intrigued by this report.

El Toro, Long Beach or as I have reported to me, 'Point Magoo' (probably Mugu) Ca, some time in 1996.

I have it being repaired by Darrell Skurich at Fort Collins during 1996/7.

Can anybody please shed any light on this with a press report and/or an image?

I go a long way back with TE356...1959 as a Gate Guard at RAF Bicester.

PeterA

Image
Image:-Ron Cranham


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:43 pm
Posts: 77
Location: Heber, UT
It was definitly El Toro....Saw it happen, and I know the pilot took alot of heat as though it was his fault. Unfortunate :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 411
Location: Minden, NV
Thanks Dave for confirming that. At least I have some memory left. After spending the night on the El Toro ramp with the Chino gang, things weren't too clear the next morning but I remember the gear problem delaying the show.

Les


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
Thanks for the info D. Hanson, & Thank You Peter A. For posting that photo, when I was a kid, I thought "Low Back" Spits were not "True" Spitfires, as I got older I think the Low Back XVI is the Sexiest of All the Spitfires! But that's just my opinion, too bad several Low Back MK XVIs have been restored to High Back, for the owner$ to HAVE the more "Classic " Spit Look. I know many XVIs came from the factory as High Backs. I have to ask, Peter, when a Low B. is converted to High B., are the Whole frames replaced, or just the top part of the frames ? & "spine?" ( of course the Canopy, etc.. Also). Thanks again, Tony

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 27
Location: undercover
Here is a photo I took of TE356 when it was in Marana, not long before the incident. I spoke with the pilot regarding the incident at a later date, and he indicated that it was his error that caused the mishap. I think this falls into the category of "there by the grace of God go I..." does not take much distraction.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:48 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
TBM Tony wrote:
Thanks for the info D. Hanson, & Thank You Peter A. For posting that photo, when I was a kid, I thought "Low Back" Spits were not "True" Spitfires, as I got older I think the Low Back XVI is the Sexiest of All the Spitfires! But that's just my opinion, too bad several Low Back MK XVIs have been restored to High Back, for the owner$ to HAVE the more "Classic " Spit Look. I know many XVIs came from the factory as High Backs. I have to ask, Peter, when a Low B. is converted to High B., are the Whole frames replaced, or just the top part of the frames ? & "spine?" ( of course the Canopy, etc.. Also). Thanks again, Tony


Well firstly many thanks for the replies. El Toro it is.

Low backs converted to high backs. Depending on the condition of the airframe, the usual route has been to replace and fit new high back quarter frames above the datum longerons with a doubler for which I believe there is an approved Battle Damage repair scheme. All frames bar one behind the cockpit are two piece, split top and bottom, back to frame 19 the tail mate aperture.

During the Battle of Britain Film TE356 was converted to a high back taxier known as a 'Markaddie', after the aircraft procurer Grp Capt Hamish Mahaddie. Not a structural conversion, just a two piece single curvature cap lightly affixed and taped.

PeterA

Image
TE356 North Weald 1968 Battle of Britain film


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
Thanks Peter, I guess there's hope that someone will "Correct" one of these current High backs back to it's original Low Back. Thanks again, Tony

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 4:32 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 1048
Location: Whittier CA USA, 25 miles east of Los Angeles
Yes it was definitely El Toro and remember hearing about it as I was there on Friday. I also know who was flying and that he was fired for it. Maybe not ok to name names. Mistakes happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 240 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group