Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:43 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: "Lockheed" P-70?
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 12:50 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
I was at a local shopping centre and went into the toy/hobby shop.
There was a new Revell of Germany kit of a P-70 "Nighthawk" night fighter.

The box called it a Lockheed...complete with the circle R trademark design.
I was under the impression the Boeing is the owner of Douglas "heritage" designs. (Go to their company store and website for examples).

Did the A-20 series some how end up in as a Lockheed property...or the our German friends make a huge mistake?

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Last edited by JohnB on Fri May 12, 2017 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: "Lockheed" P-70?
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 6:54 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2707
Location: NP, NJ, USA
I noticed that on a kit in my new Squadron Catalog.

The Minicraft 1/72 Martin Mariner was labeled as a Lockheed Martin on the box. :?

https://www.scalehobbyist.com/catagorie ... gIzZfD_BwE

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: "Lockheed" P-70?
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 9:11 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
Well, technically the Mariner is "Lockheed Martin" now...

Hopefully, we won't see a Boeing DC-3 kit!

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: "Lockheed" P-70?
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 671
Location: Indiana
I got a Boeing P-51 shirt for Christmas a couple years ago.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: "Lockheed" P-70?
PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2017 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 683
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
JohnB wrote:
Well, technically the Mariner is "Lockheed Martin" now...

No, it is not!

Technically speaking, the only thing that is true in that regard is that the company that once built the Mariner is "Lockheed Martin" now but that does not change the fact that all Mariners were simply "Martin" aircraft - and they remain such in spite of much later changes to the company.

Just because the company later changed names or ownership merged with another company does not alter the fact that the A-20 and P-70 Havoc series was "built" by Douglas, not by McDonnell Douglas or Boeing, etc. (And DC-3 series too!) Same with the PBM Mariner series; they were all "built" by Martin, not Lockheed Martin, and Lockheed Martin certainly has never had anything to do with the Mariner - not to mention the fact that almost none still exist, certainly not actually in service anywhere, since Lockheed Martin has been in existence.

Stupid bureaucrats at a certain Federal agency in Washington DC make the very same mistake and apparently too often ignore (or just don't understand) their own regs (i.e. 14 CFR 45.13a) - aircraft do not change their formal identification just because of a change in ownership or name of the company that once built them. They are supposed to be formally identified solely based on who actually "built" them and as what - i.e. the builder's model and builder's serial number, etc.

For example, after the tragic crash of Chalk's Ocean Airways Flight 101 in December 2005, the FAA eventually issued AD 2006-01-51 which nominally specified applicability to all "Frakes Aviation (Gulfstream American) Model G-73 (Mallard) series airplanes..." but there is no such thing, never has been and likely never will be. No G-73 Mallard currently in existence has ever been formally identified (registered or certified) as either a "Frakes" or "Gulfstream American" model G-73. Those companies are only subsequent owners of the TC under which the G-73 series was originally built and certified (i.e. TC A-783) but neither company ever "built" a G-73 Mallard. In fact, every G-73 Mallard that has ever existed was actually "built" by the Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation (aka just "Grumman") and remains formally identified as such in spite of subsequent changes to either the company or the TC in question.

It's not like there is any regulatory requirement to reissue or replace an aircraft's data tag simply on the basis of a change in ownership of the company that built a particular aircraft or of the TC under which it was built. Such "revisionism" is plainly wrong and incorrect.

_________________
“To invent the airplane is nothing. To build one is something. But to fly is everything!” - Otto Lilienthal

Natasha: "You got plan, darling?"
Boris: "I always got plan. They don't ever work, but I always got one!"

Remember, any dummy can be a dumb-ass...
In order to be a smart-ass, you first have to be "smart"
and to be a wise-ass, you actually have to be "wise"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: "Lockheed" P-70?
PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2017 2:24 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
Chill dude! :) :) :)
I didn't say LM built the Mariner....but it's legal ownership is now with LM, unless they put it into public domain by giving to the FAA (which is how new-build Great Lakes came to he built).

With none flying, I'd guess it not much of a money spinner for LM, but one wonders if Boeing doesn't makes a few bucks by supporting old Douglas, North American, Rockwell, (and Fairchild A-10?) products?

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group