Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:15 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:34 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7815
Focke Wulf Fw 190 High-altitude developments. The Fw 190C V18 prototype, with large ventral "pouch" fairing for the turbocharger installation and broader-chord vertical fin/rudder.

Designer Kurt Tank started looking at ways to address the altitude performance problem early in the program. In 1941, he proposed a number of versions featuring new powerplants, and he suggested using turbochargers in place of superchargers. Three such installations were outlined.

Fw 190 V12
(an A-0) would be outfitted with many of the elements which eventually led to the B series.
Fw 190 V13
(W.Nr. 0036) first C-series prototype
Fw 190 V15
(W.Nr. 0036) second C-series prototype
Fw 190 V16
(W.Nr. 0036) third C-series prototype
Fw 190 V18
(W.Nr. 0036) fourth C-series prototype

The Fw 190A series' performance decreased at high altitudes (usually 6,000 m (20,000 ft) and above), which reduced its effectiveness as a high-altitude interceptor. From the Fw 190's inception, there had been ongoing efforts to address this with a turbosupercharged BMW 801 in the B model, the much longer-nosed C model with efforts to also turbocharge its chosen Daimler-Benz DB 603 inverted V12 powerplant, and the similarly long-nosed D model with the Junkers Jumo 213. Problems with the turbocharger installations on the -B and -C subtypes meant only the D model entered service in September 1944. These high-altitude developments eventually led to the Focke-Wulf Ta 152, which was capable of extreme speeds at medium to high altitudes (755kph/469mph at 13,500m/44,300ft).[5] While these "long nose" 190 variants and the Ta 152 derivative especially gave the Germans parity with Allied opponents, they arrived too late to affect the outcome of the war.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
45+47=Psalm 92:6


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
I have a limited-run 1/48 model kit of that airplane. I need to dig it out and build it sometime.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:45 pm
Posts: 226
What a great start to 2020 Mark :drink3:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 01, 2020 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 11:37 pm
Posts: 420
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanks for posting. Very nice

_________________
Better is the enemy of Good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:12 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
The nice thing about those photos, is the guys flying the flag werk FW-190’s with the Chinese engine and four bladed props can say “ yes, a few Fw-190s flew with a four bladed prop.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
Would be a nice goal for a Flug Werk builder to make a copy of this design....not a combat plane, but a really neat pattern for a build.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 280
Location: Perth Western Australia
The V-18 looks awkward with the turbo seeming tacked on.
This seems to be the case with any fighter aircraft not designed around the turbo system and retrofitted with one.
Is there any example of a turbo being successfully retro fitted to an existing fighter design?
Bombers were different as the wing mounted engines and nacelles gave greater ability to add turbos without compromises eg B-17, B-24 all started without turbos but quickly gained them.

_________________
Chris Mellor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 8:57 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Rick65 wrote:
The V-18 looks awkward with the turbo seeming tacked on.
This seems to be the case with any fighter aircraft not designed around the turbo system and retrofitted with one.
Is there any example of a turbo being successfully retro fitted to an existing fighter design?
Bombers were different as the wing mounted engines and nacelles gave greater ability to add turbos without compromises eg B-17, B-24 all started without turbos but quickly gained them.


You could compare the evolution of the P-41 to the P-43 to the P-47,

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 8:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 280
Location: Perth Western Australia
shrike wrote:
Rick65 wrote:

You could compare the evolution of the P-41 to the P-43 to the P-47,


The P-41 and P-43 were developed in parallel and the P-43 installation was better integrated than the V-18, hardly looking bolt on at all. The P-47 was more refined and bigger!

_________________
Chris Mellor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 11:23 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1120
Location: Caribou, Maine
Was this FW.190 design influenced by the P-51, or made independent of that?

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:53 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
old iron wrote:
Was this FW.190 design influenced by the P-51, or made independent of that?
I'm guessing independently since the Meredith paper was published in 1936. In fact, the Germans may have already known of it through their own research, but I don't know either way.

Quote:
F. W. Meredith was a British engineer working at the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE), Farnborough. Reflecting on the principles of liquid cooling, he realized that what was conventionally regarded as waste heat, to be transferred to the atmosphere by a coolant in a radiator, need not be lost. The heat adds energy to the airflow and, with careful design, this may be used to generate thrust. The work was published in 1936.

The phenomenon became known as the "Meredith effect" and was quickly adopted by the designers of prototype fighter aircraft then under development, including the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane whose Rolls-Royce PV-12 engine, later named the Merlin, was cooled by ethylene glycol. An early example of a Meredith effect radiator was incorporated in the design of the Spitfire for the first flight of the prototype on 5 March 1936.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meredith_effect

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/History/SP-445/ch5-5.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:15 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Rick65 wrote:
shrike wrote:
Rick65 wrote:

You could compare the evolution of the P-41 to the P-43 to the P-47,


The P-41 and P-43 were developed in parallel and the P-43 installation was better integrated than the V-18, hardly looking bolt on at all. The P-47 was more refined and bigger!


Not looking bolted on, but all of the supercharger trunking run below the wing of the previous generations, giving the P-47 its distinctive egg shaped fuselage section.

For looking kind of kludged you'd need to look at early American aircraft of the 30's with exposed, vertically mounted turbo-superchargers and piping.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 273 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group