Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 9:19 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 11:43 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
The following from proposed Military Authorization Bill for 2007.

H.R.5122
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Reported in House)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SEC. 136. LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF F-117A AIRCRAFT DURING FISCAL YEAR 2007.

(a) Limitation- The number of F-117A aircraft retired by the Secretary of the Air Force during fiscal year 2007 may not exceed 10.

(b) Treatment of Retired Aircraft- The Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain each F-117A aircraft that is retired by the Secretary after September 30, 2006, in a condition that would allow recall of that aircraft to future service.


SEC. 133. LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF U-2 AIRCRAFT.

(a) Fiscal Year 2007- The Secretary of the Air Force may not retire any U-2 aircraft of the Air Force in fiscal year 2007.

(b) Years After Fiscal Year 2007- After fiscal year 2007, the Secretary of the Air Force may retire a U-2 aircraft only if the Secretary of Defense certifies to Congress that the U-2 intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capability provided by the U-2 aircraft no longer contributes to mitigating any gaps in ISR capabilities identified in the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review. No action may be taken by the Department of Defense to retire (or to prepare to retire) any U-2 aircraft--


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 12:18 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
the same should apply to the f-14.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 6:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:51 am
Posts: 365
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
tom d. friedman wrote:
the same should apply to the f-14.



Not to be crass but....why? The U-2 and F-117's still fill out important roles, the F-14's role has been supplanted by an aircraft that is not only cheaper to operate and maintain, but has the ability to perform multiple roles. In addition, Super Hornets have fewer hours on the airframes than even the "youngest" F-14.

_________________
Phil K.
Yankee Air Museum
Systems Admin / Ramp Crew / Professional Photo Ruiner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 8:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:12 am
Posts: 871
They can store a F-117 in my garage with the provision that it could be returned to active duty. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:28 am
Posts: 103
Location: WI
chico wrote:
Not to be crass but....why?


I would think because it is faster to re-call ex-f14 pilots and stuff them in their familiar aircraft in the event of the outbreak of an all-out war, rather than have to re-train them on planes that they then would have to share. We can recall faster than we can build...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:15 pm 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
I did not get to spend a lot of time round the F-14Ds but it appears a lot of them were upgraded from F-14A. The F-14A that VF-213 was flying when I was in were in bad shape, worse when they had to cross deck the best airframes to the VF squadrons in Japan.

They aircraft were tired and required lots of TLC keep them in the air.

Anyone know how the F-14D was holding up? I'd think in the 10 years after I got out they had to be on par with the F-14A that I severed with. VF-213 moved from F-14A to F-14D the year I go out. A Navy fighter has a hard life!

Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group