Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 30, 2025 1:31 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:01 pm
Posts: 55
Location: Washington, DC
NTSB Recommends Broadening Aging Aircraft Rule
Regional Aviation News
via NewsEdge Corporation

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recommended the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) require records reviews, aging aircraft inspections and supplemental inspections for Parts 121 and 135 aircraft older than the 1958 cut-off date of the aging aircraft rule. The recommendations (A-06-52) result from the crash last December of a 55-year-old Chalk's Ocean Airways Grumman G-72T Turbo Mallard Seaplane when the right wing sheared off in Miami, Fla. All 18 passengers and two crewmembers were killed. The Board recounted the history of FAA's aging aircraft rule, which, in its proposed form, would have captured the Mallard and required damage-

tolerance-based supplemental inspection programs. By the time the final rule

emerged in February 2005, it only applied to transport-category, turbine-powered

equipment, type certificated after 1958 with 30 passengers or more. The Mallard

was made in 1947; an exemption for Alaska aircraft remained in the final rule.

The proposed rule also would have captured Part 135 aircraft with nine or fewer

passengers or in cargo operations. NTSB wants damage-tolerance inspections

extended to those aircraft. The board said that exemptions in the final rule are

contrary to the single-level of safety ordered by the FAA in the mid-1990s as

well as the Aging Airplane Safety Act passed by Congress in 1991.

The NTSB noted that damage-tolerance inspections may be impractical

because of a lack of support from the type-certificate holder. However, an

equivalent program can be developed based on structural fatigue analysis,

fatigue tests and/or field experience.

<<Regional Aviation News -- 08/01/06>>

Source:

http://www.amtonline.com/article/articl ... =1&id=2599


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ErrolC, Google [Bot] and 62 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group