Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 30, 2025 6:32 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:39 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3249
Location: New York
Here, again, I know the place and time, but not the aircraft.

Image

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:33 am 
Offline
Taylorcraft Racing

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:29 pm
Posts: 832
Location: Amorica
PoF ex-RCAF 858?

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:44 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3249
Location: New York
You might be on the right track there Jim. The picture was taken Sept. 16, 1969, at Ontario and #858 was there then. That is one of the possibilities. However, to throw a bit of a wrench in the works, and hopefully to attract some more guesses, here is a second picture of another P-40N taken at the same place on the same day.

Image

My caption for this one:
"Honey, where'd you park the P-40?"
"Out by the ICBM, dear."

Of interest on this one is that the spinner is not a standard P-40 unit but is shorter and more conical. The prop does not look right either. This and the general state of the aircraft make me think that it is a static display not under active restoration while the other one I posted looks closer to airworthy.

As Jim said, #858 is one of the possibilities. Another P-40N that was at Ontario at that time was 44-7369, later of Don Plumb as C-GTGR, then Joe Mabee and currently Cavanaugh as N40PN. Assuming these two P-40s are 858 and 44-7369, I have no idea which is which but as the WWD lists 858 as being a "wreck" resulting from a gear-up landing that was restored to airworthiness only in 1977-80 and 44-7369 as being flyable by 1971-72, my guess would be that the first pic was 44-7369 and this 858, because the latter looks more like a hasty static patch-up of a belly-landed plane. If someone can supplant guesswork with actual information, please jump in!

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:35 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
#2 may have a P-38 prop and spinner, also note the rope keeping the prop from turning. Something must have been missing the the motor department (like the crank?). If you can blow that photo up bigger, does the prop turn in the correct direction of rotation? Top should go to the right from the pilot's seat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:42 pm 
Offline
Warbird Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 7:16 am
Posts: 727
Location: USA
Looks like the elevator was disconnected since it is hanging down very steeply.

_________________
Live to fly, Fly to live.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:14 am
Posts: 854
I'm afraid I have little to add here...

However, I believe that this image shows the same ship as your first photo:

Image
Image source: unknown


The ship in the first photo could be, and probably is, 44-7369.

I'd say that the second photo is 42-105192 (RCAF 858) because, besides the line of reasoning given by August, this ship has
the opening panel on the left side of the windscreen, as does the POF Hawk, and also because it has non-standard upper cowl
panels for a P-40N, which the POF Hawk also has.

None of this is conclusive, just guesswork based on a comparison of these photos and the two suspects in question.


Fade to Black...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:32 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3249
Location: New York
I would say your pic is certainly the same bird as my first pic, and probably at very close to the same time. The shark mouth and oddly painted eye are distinctive. That looks like the same fence in the background, they're in the same spot on the tarmac (note lighter area just in front of the wheels, and even the prop, tailwheel, flaps and chocks are in the same positions. They're both missing the ailerons and the same piece of the belly fairing as well, and there's even that same piece of rope or whatever lying on the ground near the tail.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], OD/NG, phil65 and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group