JBoyle wrote:
The remains of the F-89 don't look right. In My opinion.
The wing separation looks too clean, and the fuselage too intact following what would have been a high speed water impact.
A low speed impact? I don't think they would have attemped a controlled ditching...that's why there are ejection seats. Though I don't have a copy of the F-89 Dash One (pilots handbook) at hand. I can't believe a ditching would have been attempted since low set air intakes would not be conducive to any water landing attempt.
Remember JB, this is a sound produced image. In both shots we were given,
the wing separation area is on the leeside of the target. The 1st sonar image
is taken from the right side of the F-89..that's why the shadows are on the left...same for the second shot.
Really, if it was a photo image the result would be the same...you're not
privy to an actual image of the separation area of the left wing.
As for the appearance of a ditching, if they were in a situation at high altitude
and were only able to recover at the last moments, wouldn't it be possible
they were involuntarily to a committed ditching? As for the wing not being
immediate to the aircraft, JP is lighter than water. I wonder how long the
left wing would've drifted before it found it's way to the bottom?
One final thing, they had the sonar settings on the lowest rez in order to
extend the range of their image swaths. Now they know where she's at, I'll
wager that they could show us images in a better resolution.