Aircraft Mech Paul wrote:
Now....I know all of the things that could be said regarding restoring something like a Lancaster back to airworthy status, but with only two flyable examples in the world, doesn't it make a little bit of sense to make the attempt to make "One More" airworthy ??
The task becomes more difficult as they have been exposed to the elements longer. The CWH Lanc was on a pole for 15 years. The Windsor Lanc was on a pole for 40 years. You can imagine (or Ed will tell you) the difference that makes to the airframes. It may be that nothing is impossible, but restoring 212 to airworthy would be a much harder and more expensive undertaking than 213 was.
Ed, you and the crew are doing a fantastic job and I can't wait to see your dream realized.
August