Since people seem to think that the off-topic section is for political discussion, something that is frowned upon, I have temporarily closed the section. ANY political discussions in any other forum will be deleted and the user suspended. I have had it with the politically motivated comments.
Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:40 am
The Aspen thing embodies alot of people. It was I havn't attacked anyone..
Ah geez who are ya trying to kid??? You were bashing Bill and you know it. Be honest . Unless, there's another white, liberal, educated, anti-war Spifire flying banker in Aspen I don't know about.
Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:46 am
Come on jack your reaching! Bill is not a kid and is is not on drugs.. Remember Jack, when your pointing your finger at me 4 are pointing back at you.. Let call it a truce and Give Rob Rhor a second chance!
Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:43 am
I appreciate comments on my behalf by Jack and others, I think it's time to let it slide here. It is a shame in this day, to see one or two people that are so narrow in their views that an idea is so frightening to them that they don't want anyone to hear it. I value the PM s from those that mostly agree with me, but especially those who don't share my view, but do respect free speech, open and civil discussion.
Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:20 am
I also appreciate and value PM from the many members that value and appreciate the contribution that the armed services have made to this country that has made this forum possible. Military serviemembers are on duty now defending those who would like to remove our American Democratic gift of self-determination. I make no apologies, Freedom of speech is a medium where the responses can be objectionable and sometimes have consequences. However, in America it doesn't cost you your life. Further I hope some of us can come away from this a little wiser. Anyway, That said, Let's give Rob a Second Chance!
Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:53 am
That said, Let's give Rob a Second Chance!
Let me quote someone.........
NOthat value and appreciate the contribution that the armed services have made to this country that has made this forum possible.
I don't think there's a single person on this forum who doesn't appreciate the freedoms we enjoy due to the valor and sacrifice of this country's servicemen and women of all eras.
Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:00 am
Jack Cook wrote:That said, Let's give Rob a Second Chance!
Let me quote someone.........
NOJack arn't you being a little rough? What happed to forgive and forget? Come on Jaaaaaaaaaaaaack!that value and appreciate the contribution that the armed services have made to this country that has made this forum possible.
I don't think there's a single person on this forum who doesn't appreciate the freedoms we enjoy due to the valor and sacrifice of this country's servicemen and women of all eras.
I question that!
Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:22 am
Jack arn't you being a little rough?
Not my decision. I'm just quoting.
I question that!
You're correct. There are wixers all over the world. They would certainly appreciated the service of their own armed forces before that of ours.
Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:26 am
Jack Cook wrote:Jack arn't you being a little rough?
Not my decision. I'm just quoting.
Does this mean you would not object? I question that!
You're correct. There are wixers all over the world. They would certainly appreciated the service of their own armed forces before that of ours.
Eureka, We found some common ground! Were making progress Jack!
Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:05 pm
OK, I've refrained from this thread until now, but isn't that up to the moderators? If it's bothering you that much that Rob isn't here, then just ask everyone in favor of re-instating him to PM Scott. Then it's up to him. Personally, I don't really care either way. I liked some of what he brought to the forum, but there were some things that were bothersome.
I heard this from a good preacher a while back - When you start to throw mud, two things happen. Your hands get dirty, and you tend to loose a lot of ground.
Ryan
Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:47 pm
RyanShort1 wrote:OK, I've refrained from this thread until now, but isn't that up to the moderators? If it's bothering you that much that Rob isn't here, then just ask everyone in favor of re-instating him to PM Scott. Then it's up to him. Personally, I don't really care either way. I liked some of what he brought to the forum, but there were some things that were bothersome.
I heard this from a good preacher a while back - When you start to throw mud, two things happen. Your hands get dirty, and you tend to loose a lot of ground.
Ryan
Scott said no two pages ago. I don't see him changing his mind and inundating him with pm's probably would not be overly helpful.
The rest of this thread is just beating a dead horse. You get all sweaty and at the end of the day the horse still ain't movin'.
Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:53 pm
Does this mean you would not object?
Not that it matters but yes I would
Eureka, We found some common ground!
Doubtful
just beating a dead horse.
Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:58 pm
Wow, did you see the nose on that B-24A. Sure looked sexy. Aero Trader does good work.
Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:46 pm
Scott WRG Editor wrote:
No
I had no issues with Rohr, but he really did tear up the board at times, I stand behind our moderators decision.
Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:05 am
Rob was given way more chances than anyone else and he burned them all. I have given him a way back in, a donation in excess of $1,000,000 dollars or a large twin engine piston aircraft. If he donates either one then I will gladly let him back. With that exception, not even hell freezing over will get him back on.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.