k5083 wrote:
Bill, I was have been impressed by Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz's writings on this subject lately. He answers exactly your question in the November issue of Vanity Fair.
Some of the highlights of his plan include:
- R&D into alternative energy sources. Domestic oil is just a band-aid and ethanol is a dead end that has turned into just another farm subsidy.
- Skew taxes back toward the higher income brackets, in part by retooling, capital gains and estate taxes and the mortgage deduction.
- Stronger regulation of financial markets, which have proven (yet again) that they can't self-regulate responsibly.
- As far as bailouts, nobody likes what looks like a windfall rescue of either the incompetent bankers or the homeowners who took out loans they couldn't afford, but unfortunately both the banks and the working poor are too essential to our economy to leave out in the cold. Just try to make sure it doesn't happen again (see regulation, above).
- Invest in infrastructure, education, and technology -- things with double benefits, short- and long-term.
Most of this stuff should be ideologically neutral, except for the taxes part, and so should be possible to enact. That's good because neither the socialists nor the libertarians, to use each sides stupid label for the other, has the answers. Also, the few hundred people that we usually blame the mess on, whether they are really responsible for it or not, cannot get us out of it. The economy cannot be fixed by the president, by bank CEOs, by Fed chairmen, by congressional committees. It's the other 300 million of us that have to get the job done. Most importantly, the middle and lower classes. Everything we do should be oriented to getting out of their way so that they can be productive again. The economy is built on their shoulders and will ultimately be fine if we stop screwing them over.
August
The one flaw in his plan is - "Skew taxes back toward the higher income brackets, in part by retooling, capital gains and estate taxes and the mortgage deduction." If that is done, who is going to provide the jobs for the "lower and middle classes" that you state will get us out of this mess?
I have got about 40 employees in my two businesses, if my taxes continue to go up, what is the motivation for me to continue to expand and hire more people? So I can pay even more taxes?
I have a lot of friends who are small business owners who make more than the moving target presented by Obama for more taxes. Universally, the have all described to me that they intend to cut back the growth of their various businesses and reduce their employee overhead if this comes to pass.
This could just be ancedotal, and probably is, but the danger is that if you increase the tax the small businessman, the one who provides the jobs, they will retract their growth plans. I know I will.
Small businessmen didn't create this problem. Wall Street and the banking systems...assisted greatly by a Congress who rejected proper oversight, even when it was requested by the sitting Administartion, caused this problem. Let's not penalize the real engine of the American economy.