Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 3:42 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Scanning pictures
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:15 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
When scanning a picture, what give the best quality scan i.e. jpeg, bmp, tif, etc.? Thanks.

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:27 am
Posts: 257
Location: Schiedam, NL
TIFF, but you will get very big files.
JPEG uses lossy data compression so you will loose quality. But it is good enough for most people.

_________________
http://www.warbird-hangar.com links and gallery &
http://www.yakkes.com Yakkes Foundation, Yak-52


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:41 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
Scott,

It will depend on what you want to do with the scans.

I try to scan at the highest possible resolution and save the files as .tiff

While this creates hughe files, disk storage is not as expensive as it used to be, and I have purchased a couple of removable hard drives of 80gigs each, and these have been very handy to store not only my scans, but also the digital photos I have been shooting recently.

Whenever I need to publish a photo, I make a copy of the original, and then mess with the copy, so that if I happen to screw things up, the original remains untouched.

For web publishing, a resolution of 100dpi should do. This will not only give you a sharp photo, but will also load fast in most computers.

Remember to keep the size of the image small, let's say around 800 by 600 pixels or so (dimensions can be kept proportional by the image manipulation software that you use).

A while back, someone was kind enough to give me a "cheat-sheet" on how to use photoshop elements to tweak photos for web publication, and if you are interested, I will be glad to share this little document with you.

Saludos,

Tulio


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3246
Location: New York
Bmp will give you just as good results as tiff, but the file size will be even bigger. Those are the commonly available options. Tiff is the choice of most because it produces the smallest non-lossy files. Avoid jpg is pretty much the main rule to remember.

Scan to 16-bit files if you can. This will double the file size over 8-bit, and you may have to convert to 8-bit for editing and web publishing, but at least you will have the richer files archived for future use.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:44 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Thanks for the tips. I have a brand new HP C5100 scanner and I'm not impressed with the quality of the scans I'm getting from the pictures I've been running through it. Doesn't seem to matter what dpi or methed (i.e. jpeg, tif, bmp) I use. I'm just wondering if that's just the nature of scanning pictures into a computer. When I scan a picture and re-print it as a photograph, it does a great job.

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:56 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3246
Location: New York
If you are using the same device to scan and reprint as you are to scan into the computer, the difference you're noticing is probably some post-processing that the device applies to the pictures before printing. The input into the computer would be the same as what the device is using for the printing. When you get skilled with post-processing the image in Photoshop (or whatever), which any scanned print needs, you should be able to get a scan that looks just as good as those re-prints. Or better.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:15 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Tulio wrote:
Scott,



A while back, someone was kind enough to give me a "cheat-sheet" on how to use photoshop elements to tweak photos for web publication, and if you are interested, I will be glad to share this little document with you.

Saludos,

Tulio


I'd be very interested in you're "cheat sheet" Thanks!

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:25 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:49 am
Posts: 1521
Location: Zurich & Zug / Switzerland
Hi

I use the CanoScan 8400F

I usually scan my photos, slides or negs at high resolution in .tiff mode -


Depending on the quality of the original, I normally use the following settings

small size photos (up to 4 inch) I scan at 800 - 1600 dpi, medium size photos I run at 400 - 800dpi, larger ones (8x10's) at 300 - 400 dpi.
For details (like data-blocks on a/c, noseart, etc.) I even go to 3200 dpi.

Slides and negatives I usually scan at 800 dpi.

the original scans are stored on one of my two 320 giga external HDD's, and when I need a photo, I pull a copy of the original file and give it a go with photoshop, paintshop pro or similar tools, for resizing, cleaning up and other tweaking, and the result is saved as .jpeg file.

Hope this helps
Martin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group