chico wrote:
I've gotta tow the Don Cherry line about no-touch icing. Too many guys get hurt going into the boards awkwardly racing down a puck.
For me, the touch icing rule is strictly a way to keep the game exciting. Since the puck remains in play the race for the puck or forcing the goalie to play it adds an element of excitement. Also many of the injuries that happened during the race for the puck were the result of other factures like boarding, checking from behind and slew footing and so on. So the race didn't hurt him, the guy crosschecking him from behind did. At some level there is an increased risk of injury to players but is it any worse than other potential risks of injury in the game? What's next....no fighting!
chico wrote:
I like the ice size the way it is. The Euro rinks are too big in my book. Everybody's entitled to their opinion, even if they're wrong

.
As for the larger ice surface, it would open up the game by allowing the more talented players room to skate. As it stands now the NHL's approach to giving the better players room is by increasing the rules relating to clutching, grabbing and interference. The only thing I've noticed is more penalties being called delaying the game more. Anyway, a larger rink will never happen because they would loose about two rows of revenue generating seating.
chico wrote:
Yeah, it seems that game took a turn after i went to bed for the night.

Luongo spent so many years getting shelled in Florida, he must be in hog heaven up in Vancouver.
Luongo's never had so much attention! Best trade we've made in a long time.
chico wrote:
They've got Calgary to knob-slob all over. I heard Brett Hull open his cake hole to rag on the Wings. Man, I can't stand that guy.
The CBC's still got the Sens, without at least one eastern team they would surely have play reruns of Coronation Street.
BTW, what was Brett Hull spouting off about?
Brian....