I think, but can't prove, that Lacey obtained only the right to display the airplane, paying $1,500 for that permission. The "bill of sale" presented by Lacey is incomplete but the going price for B-17s in 1947 from the WAA was more than $1,500, and it was not uncommon for these aircraft to be released for educational or memorial use (i.e. Memphis Belle) but in these cases the U.S. government retained title. He certainly did not pay $13,750 for this airplane.
With the Lacey B-17, I frankly doubt the U.S. government knows or cares that it probably owns the airplane, as it is doubtful they could prove it in court that they own the airplane. Good luck trying to find any paperwork on that WAA transaction in 1947.
I had conversations with both Lacey and Sturges about 1990. The Lacey version of how that airplane got to Oregon is a bit far-fetched. Sturges seemed to me to be quite straight-forward, reliable, and believable.
The Lacey family, however, is adamant in their insistance of the truth of Lacey's version. I recently got into a discussion with one of them and requested some documents, any documents, that would support the Lacey version (i.e. two bombers actually purchased, one to replace the one Lacey supposedly crashed, etc.). No response yet.
Interesting stuff. When I last saw the airplane a few years ago it seemed in poor, but not unrecoverable, condition. It remains a sad sight, nonetheless.
|