Wed May 09, 2007 10:59 am
Bill Greenwood wrote: A friend leading a flight of jets hit a cable 26 feet above a lake, square in the nose and made it back. Had he been a foot lower it would have taken off his canopy and head. He admits to being young and foolish then.
Wed May 09, 2007 12:30 pm
mustangdriver wrote:Ther are old pilots and bold pilots, but no old bold pilots.
Wed May 09, 2007 12:50 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 2:48 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 3:01 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 3:41 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 5:13 pm
mike furline wrote:I've seen pics posted on this forum of a P-51 flying a super low pass down the runway where the photographer was almost certainly standing on the same active runway to take the picture or the Sea Fury pic as seen from the rear view mirror of a truck. Seems like everyone gave it the thumbs up.
Wed May 09, 2007 6:13 pm
retroaviation wrote:mike furline wrote:I've seen pics posted on this forum of a P-51 flying a super low pass down the runway where the photographer was almost certainly standing on the same active runway to take the picture or the Sea Fury pic as seen from the rear view mirror of a truck. Seems like everyone gave it the thumbs up.
Well, since I'm the one you're referring to with that comment, I'll address it.
The Mustang picture was taken while I was standing at the far end of the runway.....standing off of the runway surface. The airplane was certainly lower than any of us were comfortable with, and our future shots were done at higher altitudes and with the pilot pulling up well before he got to the photographer (me).
The Sea Fury shot was indeed taken with me driving down the centerline of the active runway.
Both pictures were taken only after briefing the flights BEFORE they took place and I had a handheld radio with me to be in communication with the pilots at all times. The airport those pictures were taken at were at a non-controlled, very low activity airport. We always kept an eye open for arriving or departing aircraft, and if one came through, they got the right of way.
It's true that those pictures (along with many others I've taken over the years) aren't necessarily "unrisky," but that's what makes them unique and interesting. Just like flying a Beech 18 through a billboard for a movie is a bit more unique and interesting than filming one doing touch and go's at LAX. I'm sure they briefed the Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World flights as well.
I see your point, Mike, but thought I should defend myself a little bit.
Gary
Wed May 09, 2007 6:25 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 6:42 pm
mike furline wrote:
Gary,
No need to defend, wasn't trying to lay blame on anyone. I had no idea who had posted those shots, just remembered seeing them on the forum.
I'm sure the majority of pics/clips had the benefit of a pre-briefed/planned flight.
Just thought it was interesting how some pics/clips get the "thumbs down" and others get the "thumbs up" from what appears to be the same risky piece of flying.
Regards,
Mike
Wed May 09, 2007 6:53 pm
mustangdriver wrote:I think there is a huge difference in making a low pass, and dodging trees.
Wed May 09, 2007 8:02 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 8:15 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 8:34 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 8:51 pm
bipe215 wrote:Not sure its fair to compare Tallman's billboard stunt with the low flying chopper dude. Tallman was doing his job, being paid to look dangerous, and he had a split second to kill himself. Chopper dude gave his self a chance to die about every five seconds through the video.
Still its all fun to watch.
Steve G