Quote:
My point was I thought the photo was funny. However if we are going to debate the cost/benefit to the average taxpayers; it is pretty silly to claim things like computers are here because of the space program. Ryan, I was under the impression the computer was invented by a Brit, then developed by IBM and furthered by Steve Jobs, etc. Could you please tell us which NASA scientist and when they invented computers, portable elctronics, GPS, emissions testing( love that one, funny when I have taken my car to be tested I have never seen any NASA guys there). As for fire proof materials, I was under the impression that things like asbsetos and firefighters protection predated NASA. Scott, there may be some medical side benefits to NASA, but do you really think they are more than we could have had if we directly funded medical research? Or offered medical ins coverage to the 16% of Americans who have nnon at all? You guys do make a good point about employment, and like many govt programs that is the real reason they exist, because some contractor and its employees can make a lot of money, as long as taxpayers are willing to fund it. Just like a defense contractors feeding on that big govt buffet. Take a look at a chart of Haliburton stock since 9-11
Bill, I want to congratulate you. You finally have come across the one argument that I just don’t care enough about to argue lol. I will agree with you at least in spirit. A lot of money is wasted by the government and I’m sure a lot of money that goes into NASA is wasted in bureaucracy.
Safe Flying,
Ryan