This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Nice selection Rob.

Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:39 am

Have not had to do much searching of book's and net for a while 8) .
So I will join in,(bet Turbo(Chris) might too :lol: ).
I think I have one already and a little warm on another :wink: .
But will hit the book's and net now :shock: , just to be sure and get some brain cell's a zapping :rolleyes: :crispy: ,
Back in a while, Cheer's all :partyman: , :finga: Tally Ho! :spit Phil :supz: .

Ok here's my first attempt

Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:14 am

I think number 1 is the Great Lakes XBG-1 prototype :D .
Because it look's just a little different to the 60 production BG-1's :shock: .
But then again my photo is a USMC VB-4M aircraft :roll: .
My shot at it anyway's Rob :gib: .
Cheer's all :partyman: , :twisted: Tally Ho! :spit Phil :supz: .

stumper # 9

Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:06 pm

Turning up the heat, ehh Rob ?

1. Douglas XFD-1
2. Douglas P2D-1
3. Curtiss HS-2
4. Naval Air Factory PT-2
5. Douglas P3D-1

#9

Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:38 pm

Thanx Rob,
2. NAF XTN-1
3. Curtiss HS-1

As for #4...it's book time...

# 9

Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:52 pm

Thanx Rob,
The ancient "alphabet soups" are the FUN ones...

2. By your hint, am I correct in assuming that you mean the one I labeled
originally as P2D-1, is actually a T2D-1? I was going by the 2 vert. fins.

3. Curtiss HS-1,...yeah the single-engine, wing-floats,and bow-chine pretty
much had me cornered to a -1 or -2...no rudder to look at in photo.

4. Curtiss R-6L , again by your hint, my conclusion. In the original photo
does #4 have a "Fokker D-7 like" vertical fin ?... I can't tell due to the
light-on-light combination of fin/background. Sure looks like HS wings
judging by the ailerons..which would lead me back to the NAF product.

Thanx for the "exquisite" torture Col Rob !

#9

Sun Nov 28, 2004 12:38 am

Thanx Col,
I have a concern with #2 being a T2D-1, rather than a P2D-1. But your
research materials are probably far better than mine.

Reason for concern is this blurb...could be an error..
www.boeing.com/history/mdc/t2d-1.htm

Well, #10 looks rough...I think I let our "southern-hemisphere and
cross-pond chums" have fun with it first. Books are fine but something
with a "back-beat and nice legs nearby" is in order tonight. Off to
Miss Elizabeths Grog and Grab...thanx for the fun!!!
Post a reply