Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Dec 14, 2025 4:33 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: insults and apology
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:48 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Guys, I am sorry, it never occured to me that T-28 owners were so fragile, or would take something written in jest as so serious. I think there have been jokes written on WIX about Merlins, all mis informed of course, but some humorous. Perhaps listening to that wonderful purr of all 9 of the 18 cylinders kind of gives one a complex. To be accurate and fair I only referred to the distinctive sound of the engine, I never said anything about the people who fly them or their formation ability. And we all know that formation ability is the true measure of a person's worth. If only OJ could skillfully fly an airplane he'd still be a hero everywhere. Man, just think if he could fly a T-28.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:17 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
Spitfire drivers should never have to apologize for anything. After all, god made them perfect so how can anything they do or say be wrong? :P

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:36 am
Posts: 1202
The T-28 has the same engine that is in that restored CH-34(?) helicotper that was at Thunder over Michigan. I fly helicopters and I thought the scarriest airshow act I ever saw was them doing the "downed pilot rescue".

The CH-34 actually hovered over 2 really brave guys who were then winched up in it. I'd never stand under a hovering helicopter let alone one powered by an engine that isn't as reliable as I'd like.

Snort Snodgrass in the P-51 and Corsair was nothing compared to that stunt.

So everyone lived, so all was well.

Mark H


Last edited by P51Mstg on Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:26 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
P51Mstg wrote:
I'd never stand under a hovering helicopter...


Hey! :? :P (I was air assault)

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:11 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Outer Space
P51Mstg wrote:
The T-28 has the same engine that is in that restored CH-34(?) helicotper that was at Thunder over Michigan. I fly helicopters and I thought the scarriest airshow act I ever saw was them doing the "downed pilot rescue".

The CH-34 actually hovered over 2 really brave guys who were then winched up in it. I'd never stand under a hovering helicopter let alone one powered by an engine that isn't as reliable as I'd like.

Snort Snodgrass in the +-51 and Corsair was nothing compared to that stunt.

So everyone lived, so all was well.

Mark H


I'm with you about standing under a piston powered helicopter. As a former Border Patrol Agent I used to walk and stand under hovering turbine powered helicopters (mostly OH-6's) and I wasn't too crazy about that


Last edited by maxum96 on Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:56 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
The T-28 has the same engine that is in that restored CH-34(?) helicopter that was at Thunder over Michigan. I fly helicopters and I thought the scarriest airshow act I ever saw was them doing the "downed pilot rescue".

My cousin flew 200+ H-34 missions in S. Vietnam. He told me that his fear of the Wright motor was equal to or greater than the VC and he was shot down 4 times :!: He was happier on his 2nd tour flying CH-46s!

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: T-28 drivers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 895
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Well Bill I've often heard that the "T" in T-28 stands for "touchy" and I think it refers to the pilots, not so much the airplane. Hey, if my airplane still had a training wheel on the nose I'd be a bit touchy. :wink:

_________________
Albert Stix Jr.
"Work is the curse of the drinking class"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:15 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
"The CH-34 actually hovered over 2 really brave guys who were then winched up in it. I'd never stand under a hovering helicopter let alone one powered by an engine that isn't as reliable as I'd like. "

Um, we briefed engine out procedures. Or were you there and I missed you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:08 am
Posts: 164
Took me a while to even find the "insult" in question.
Somebody took offense to that?
Sheesh, whatever.


<---T-28 driver.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: touchy-28
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:44 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
I agree with Albert.The tail wheel is on the wrong end.Fire away!

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:27 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:36 am
Posts: 1202
OscarDuce: I wasn't there for the briefing, I can only assume some fixed wing guy gave it since I don't think they understood the danger.

Why do you think MODERN helicopters have turbine engines? They are at least 1 million times more reliable than piston engines.

Helicopters have a height/velocity diagram, in some it is on the panel or where the pilot can see it to remind him when he is doing something wrong. It set parameters of altitude and airspeed where you can accomplish a successful autorotation. Usually at ZERO airspeed, you need be lower than 10' or higher than 500'. If you are moving, you can only go at certain airspeeds and be able to recover. Example, 100Kts at 10' and an engine failure and you will be on the ground before you know it happened. 100Kts at 300 feet may be safe, or anything greater than 30 or so kts at that altitude.

You see fixed wing aircraft vs rotary wing aircraft, there is a difference. ITs the fact that fixed wing pilots don't need to keep their wings moving (rotating) to keep them as wings. When rotor RPM drops below a certain level, the rotor arc (which is your wing) stops functioning as a wing and you fall like a rock. At that point rotor RPM cannot be recovered by any little tricks you know.

That CH-34 was hovering at about 20' or so. If you hover at a safer (but still not safe) altitude of 10' you get even less time to get out of the way if the engine quits, but the chopper may survive, but the guys under it are toast sinc ethey are going to egt even less warning and who in the crowd wants to see a 6' tall guy winched into a chopper hovering 4' over his head.

An engine failure, might give you 1 second's warning and no more than 3 seconds later you are on the ground. They must have hovered 5 minutes or longer. So what do you do on the ground? It takes you like 1 or 2 seconds to realize that there was an engine failure and a 5 ton piece of the sky is falling 20' on to you. So do you screw up the show and RUN FOR YOUR LIFE (maybe it wasn't a failure and you'd look like a fool), or what? Which way do you run? And how fast can you get the 25' or so it takes to get out of the rotor arc (without considering that the chopper may have moved a few feet in the direction you are running). When it hits the ground the blades make a BIG MESS (watch assorted YOUTUBE videos on it) and pieces fly off that will kill you. COunt on at least 150' to 200' as a danger zone for flying parts

They are simulating a RESCUE which is done in an EMERGENCY. This isn't an emergency by a long shot. What if there is what we refer to as a "dope on a rope" (guy hanging off the helicopter) when it happens, what is he going to do? He is really dead meat.

Also helicopters do something called "vortex ring state" or "settling with power". Basically in a nutshell you get sucked into your own downwash and the blades start to stall. This happens when you are hovering or moving at slow speeds (in the air) and generally descending. Sometimes a windshift can make all the difference, even a few knots of wind, can blow the turbulent air back under you. (it makes a heck of difference in tailpipe temp when you start or shutdown a turbine based on the wind direction (ie wind "blowing" hot exhaust "back" into the engine, makes a warmer start))

The natural reaction is to add more power to climb, but it only makes the turbulance worse that is causing the blades to stall. The only recovery is to reduce power and fly forward (or anyother direction) out of the column of turbulent air (look for a youtube video of a Canadian Sea King Helicopter crashing at an airshow, straight down from a hover). To avoid that, you fly faster than ETL (effective translational lift) or about 15kts and don't do any fast desecents. (I've been in this one once and its scarrier than anything you can do in an airplane).

If we had settling with power happen, the guys on the ground would not have had the engine sound change as a warning to run. I didn't see how far they were away from the crowd where I was at, but I can say it was close enough that to recover he would ahve had to overfly the crowd at an altitude lower than the snowfence which would means he would have had another chopper problem (DYNAMIC ROLLOVER) along with probably hitting some people in the crowd.

THe big problem with settling with power is the pilot and I'm sure he's a good guy and very experienced. But if you feel you are settling, you need to react NOW, not wait a second to be sure thats whats going on so you don't screw up the show. The would probably be a tendency to delay a second or two to be sure that we had a settling problem. I would hope not.

Dynamic rollover is a something we have seen in the helicopter tows the boat video. The Idiot (er a PILOT) attached some thing to the side of the chopper that put an assymetic force on it. It works like this.

Static (blades not turning), you need to tilt a chopper 60 degrees to make it roll over just like a crowd of drunks tipping a car over. Once it is dynamic (blades spinning) it becomes like a toy gyroscope, a few degrees of movement means it KEEPS moving and tips over. Say 5 to 7 degrees, hence when you land, you ALWAYS land on something very level. So if you have a skid that sticks in mud or hot asphalt, and you pull power and take off, you are going over. That boat was tied to the side of the chopper, not the cargo hook on the centerline and the drag from the boat started it rolling and over it went.

If the CH-34 in recovering from settling with power caught a wheel on the snowfence in front of the crowd, it would go over like it was tripped, into the crowd.

Last, even if the pilot can make a successful autorotation from 20', he's going to hit hard enough that at a minimum the blades will flex down and hit the tail boom and come apart, and more than likely the inertia of the blades will cause it to rollover and then all kinds of parts are coming off.

So its not just an engine failure thats dangerous. An autorotation from the pattern is simple and pretty darn safe. One from 20' is pretty dangerous.

So I wasn't there. What was the briefing?

Was it? The CH-34 will hover and pick up 2 guy for 6 1/2 minutes maximum and then Snort will fly the P-51.

Or did they say? Guys on the ground if you hear the engine pitch change run like h311 or die, if you happen to be on the winch when it happens you are toast. If if settles with power (explain it) you are also dead without much warning. Crash crews if it settles and they try to recover, it might hit the fence and go into the crowd ..............

It would have been just as nice to see it fly around for a few minutes and do some of the kinds of things that only helicopters can do.

But they did it and it worked and they are probably going to keep on doing it until someday it doesn't work.

Fly safe

Mark H


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:03 am
Posts: 958
Location: Creve Couer, MO
P51 Mustang wrote:

Quote:
OscarDuce: I wasn't there for the briefing, I can only assume some fixed wing guy gave it since I don't think they understood the danger.

Why do you think MODERN helicopters have turbine engines? They are at least 1 million times more reliable than piston engines.

Helicopters have a height/velocity diagram, in some it is on the panel or where the pilot can see it to remind him when he is doing something wrong. It set parameters of altitude and airspeed where you can accomplish a successful autorotation. Usually at ZERO airspeed, you need be lower than 10' or higher than 500'. If you are moving, you can only go at certain airspeeds and be able to recover. Example, 100Kts at 10' and an engine failure and you will be on the ground before you know it happened. 100Kts at 300 feet may be safe, or anything greater than 30 or so kts at that altitude.

You see fixed wing aircraft vs rotary wing aircraft, there is a difference. ITs the fact that fixed wing pilots don't need to keep their wings moving (rotating) to keep them as wings. When rotor RPM drops below a certain level, the rotor arc (which is your wing) stops functioning as a wing and you fall like a rock. At that point rotor RPM cannot be recovered by any little tricks you know.

That CH-34 was hovering at about 20' or so. If you hover at a safer (but still not safe) altitude of 10' you get even less time to get out of the way if the engine quits, but the chopper may survive, but the guys under it are toast sinc ethey are going to egt even less warning and who in the crowd wants to see a 6' tall guy winched into a chopper hovering 4' over his head.

An engine failure, might give you 1 second's warning and no more than 3 seconds later you are on the ground. They must have hovered 5 minutes or longer. So what do you do on the ground? It takes you like 1 or 2 seconds to realize that there was an engine failure and a 5 ton piece of the sky is falling 20' on to you. So do you screw up the show and RUN FOR YOUR LIFE (maybe it wasn't a failure and you'd look like a fool), or what? Which way do you run? And how fast can you get the 25' or so it takes to get out of the rotor arc (without considering that the chopper may have moved a few feet in the direction you are running). When it hits the ground the blades make a BIG MESS (watch assorted YOUTUBE videos on it) and pieces fly off that will kill you. COunt on at least 150' to 200' as a danger zone for flying parts

They are simulating a RESCUE which is done in an EMERGENCY. This isn't an emergency by a long shot. What if there is what we refer to as a "dope on a rope" (guy hanging off the helicopter) when it happens, what is he going to do? He is really dead meat.

Also helicopters do something called "vortex ring state" or "settling with power". Basically in a nutshell you get sucked into your own downwash and the blades start to stall. This happens when you are hovering or moving at slow speeds (in the air) and generally descending. Sometimes a windshift can make all the difference, even a few knots of wind, can blow the turbulent air back under you. (it makes a heck of difference in tailpipe temp when you start or shutdown a turbine based on the wind direction (ie wind "blowing" hot exhaust "back" into the engine, makes a warmer start))

The natural reaction is to add more power to climb, but it only makes the turbulance worse that is causing the blades to stall. The only recovery is to reduce power and fly forward (or anyother direction) out of the column of turbulent air (look for a youtube video of a Canadian Sea King Helicopter crashing at an airshow, straight down from a hover). To avoid that, you fly faster than ETL (effective translational lift) or about 15kts and don't do any fast desecents. (I've been in this one once and its scarrier than anything you can do in an airplane).

If we had settling with power happen, the guys on the ground would not have had the engine sound change as a warning to run. I didn't see how far they were away from the crowd where I was at, but I can say it was close enough that to recover he would ahve had to overfly the crowd at an altitude lower than the snowfence which would means he would have had another chopper problem (DYNAMIC ROLLOVER) along with probably hitting some people in the crowd.

THe big problem with settling with power is the pilot and I'm sure he's a good guy and very experienced. But if you feel you are settling, you need to react NOW, not wait a second to be sure thats whats going on so you don't screw up the show. The would probably be a tendency to delay a second or two to be sure that we had a settling problem. I would hope not.

Dynamic rollover is a something we have seen in the helicopter tows the boat video. The Idiot (er a PILOT) attached some thing to the side of the chopper that put an assymetic force on it. It works like this.

Static (blades not turning), you need to tilt a chopper 60 degrees to make it roll over just like a crowd of drunks tipping a car over. Once it is dynamic (blades spinning) it becomes like a toy gyroscope, a few degrees of movement means it KEEPS moving and tips over. Say 5 to 7 degrees, hence when you land, you ALWAYS land on something very level. So if you have a skid that sticks in mud or hot asphalt, and you pull power and take off, you are going over. That boat was tied to the side of the chopper, not the cargo hook on the centerline and the drag from the boat started it rolling and over it went.

If the CH-34 in recovering from settling with power caught a wheel on the snowfence in front of the crowd, it would go over like it was tripped, into the crowd.

Last, even if the pilot can make a successful autorotation from 20', he's going to hit hard enough that at a minimum the blades will flex down and hit the tail boom and come apart, and more than likely the inertia of the blades will cause it to rollover and then all kinds of parts are coming off.

So its not just an engine failure thats dangerous. An autorotation from the pattern is simple and pretty darn safe. One from 20' is pretty dangerous.

So I wasn't there. What was the briefing?

Was it? The CH-34 will hover and pick up 2 guy for 6 1/2 minutes maximum and then Snort will fly the P-51.

Or did they say? Guys on the ground if you hear the engine pitch change run like h311 or die, if you happen to be on the winch when it happens you are toast. If if settles with power (explain it) you are also dead without much warning. Crash crews if it settles and they try to recover, it might hit the fence and go into the crowd ..............

It would have been just as nice to see it fly around for a few minutes and do some of the kinds of things that only helicopters can do.

But they did it and it worked and they are probably going to keep on doing it until someday it doesn't work.

Fly safe

Mark H



What exactly was the point of this? Do you really think that anyone who has ever flown a helicopter is unaware of these basic elements of helicopter aerodynamics? Maybe not the best idea in the world, but far from the apocalyptic scenario you have painted in the post. We could write the same type horrible possible outcomes for many of the elements of every airshow performance, but what positive impact would that have?

Sorry, but the whole thing struck me as very condesending. I think the whole point could have been made in a much more polite/effective manner.

_________________
Eric

"I spent most of my money on alcohol, women and skyraiders....and the rest of it I just wasted."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:28 pm
Posts: 17
Location: The Mountains.
oscardeuce wrote:
"The CH-34 actually hovered over 2 really brave guys who were then winched up in it. I'd never stand under a hovering helicopter let alone one powered by an engine that isn't as reliable as I'd like. "

Um, we briefed engine out procedures. Or were you there and I missed you?


Just out of curiosity, what did that briefing sound like? "If the bird starts falling on you, start running. Quickly"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:54 am 
Offline
Aerial Pirate
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: South San Francisco, CA (next to SFO Airport)
EDowning wrote:

What exactly was the point of this? Do you really think that anyone who has ever flown a helicopter is unaware of these basic elements of helicopter aerodynamics? Maybe not the best idea in the world, but far from the apocalyptic scenario you have painted in the post. We could write the same type horrible possible outcomes for many of the elements of every airshow performance, but what positive impact would that have?

Sorry, but the whole thing struck me as very condesending. I think the whole point could have been made in a much more polite/effective manner.


I second what Eric said, it seems like just about everyone that puts on a different type of air display gets attacked for it on this board lately. How did this go from an apology post, to lets slam the CH-34 guys for putting on an enjoyable show that was different from just doing flybys? Most people know the risks that their taking, and chose to do so freely. Maybe next we can condemn skydivers for jumping out of perfectly good airplanes.

_________________
Roger Cain
www.sfahistory.org
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Stearman/


We must limit politicians to two terms:
one in office and one in jail.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:21 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
Sorry I forgot to record the exact briefing.

I am working on my rotary wing rating, and I lead the breifing for the demo. I am familiar with the aerodymanics you cite. The 2 pilots of the chopper were very aware of these issues, and the density altitude of the days we flew. We worked hard to minimize risk, and maximize the show for the crowd.

All pilots, ground crew were in agreement, as was the airboss, and the FAA.

I thought the show went off well, safe and gave the crowd a show to remember. Nothing in life is risk free. Using you arguments, the T-birds and Blues should not fly in close formation as those are high risk maneuvers, and someone can get hurt.

You cannot eliminate risks, just minimize them through education, experience, and careful flying.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 117 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group