ZRX61 wrote:
Mark_Pilkington wrote:
It has always surprised me with this claim, that there is not anything more substantial of the aircraft found to support the claim, either in the way of corroded debris locatred in the sea, while aluminium may be well gone there should be remains of steel from engine cores / undercarriage/prop hubs etc or parts washed up into the beach, as the wreck broke up, and preserved from fully corroding?
Mark Pilkington
I'm not sure how a 1200(?)lb engine would be bouyant enough to surface on a beach if she went down someplace like the Marianas Trench?
Actually ZRX61, I was referring to the claim that the aircraft was on a reef at the island, so I would assume some steel parts survived in the water, and seperately that other lighter parts may have washed up on the beach as the wreck eventually broke up over time, ie wheels/tires etc.
But you are right, if the a/c came down in the open sea, little could be expected to make it anywhere.
I am surprised that the ship wreckage is uesd to justify not exploring for any identifyable aircraft parts, surely identifiable airframe component is going to be better pointer to the confirmed identity than suposition on who was wearing brands of clothes that might have a zipper? in the middle of the Pacific.
One of the problems in science is when someone stops being impartial and starts unconciously reading their test results to meet their prediction / hypothesis, I am concerned the ongoing focus on this one scenario with such circumstantial evidence is suffering the same problem.
Regards
Mark Pilkington