rwdfresno wrote:
I rest my case.
What case? All I was stating was that the original use of propeller in the aircraft sense was for the type that pushed, rather than pulled. Thanks to your friend from the uni, this use goes back to classical Latin (which I didn't know, ancient Roman aircraft being rare.

Interesting, and thanks).
Be that as it may, they definition you've supplies of the Latin, includes definitions to drive or knock forwards, and derivatives, rather than to drag or pull forwards. An incomplete definition, perhaps, but there's no suggestion of any specific 'pull' or 'draw' definitions. I'd be delighted to watch you knock a block forwards with a hammer while hitting the front of it.
Secondly, current usage wasn't what I was talking about; current definitions define
current use. Perhaps you'd like to dig about and see what you can find for the Great War era? (British and Allied aircraft of the period used aircrew on tractor aircraft, propellers on pusher types. There weren't many American aircraft around. Prior to W.W.I, there was a lot of variation in terms by the pioneers, and little need to standardise on terminology, which came in as the result of war.)
As I said, I don't mind if you believe me or not, this isn't my opinion, just a bit (not all) of some of the word's history. As a shock, it's clearly not the US definition, and probably won't be covered by online dictionaries, as they are poor on anything but current use. Try the OED.
Quote:
This post looks like one of The Simpson's episode. It always starts one way, but ends completely different...
Part of the charm of the forum, perhaps.
Them were fascinating pictures of the ship, too.
Regards,