Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 09, 2026 12:39 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:02 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
Does anyone have a Martin Baltimore 187 or Maryland 167??

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:09 pm 
Yes, it is true that there are no "Betty's" that are complete in any way. It's too bad that the allies didn't save the betty's used in the surrender with the green crosses. At least one should have been saved. Any idea what happened to them?


Last edited by Hellcat on Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:12 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
Blackburn Shark

Ok, so there is wreckage of one still in existence, but it is stored away.

-David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
The thread said what Significant types.

The only type that has been posted that was actually significant and correctly extinct is the Martin Maryland, Baltimore 167/187.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:55 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3333
Joe Scheil wrote:
The thread said what Significant types.

The only type that has been posted that was actually significant and correctly extinct is the Martin Maryland, Baltimore 167/187.

Joe,

A rather large number of Bomber Command veterans would take issue with you over your dismissal of the Stirling and Whitley as 'insignificant'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
Significant types that do not exist...partial list...

And having them is nothing without displaying them in context...

Martin MB-2

Boeing B-9, XB-15 and of course the C-98.

Ki-44 Shoki...well thats a stretch

There are Betty components and several chunks on display, perhaps none better than Planes of Fame's Betty on display. However there are no Nell's and that friends was a true record breaker and also a deadly sword of 1942. The Mitsubishi/Nakajima G3M1 Naval Bomber is like the A5M, super significant types that encouraged a nation's expansion but were not built upon with the same innovation.

Ju-86P?

Fw-56

TBD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:26 pm 
Joe Scheil wrote:
The thread said what Significant types.

The only type that has been posted that was actually significant and correctly extinct is the Martin Maryland, Baltimore 167/187.


I'd still have to say the:

1. TBD
2. Short Sterling
3. Val
4. Betty
5. Kate

Stand out above all the rest. We're talking COMPLETE restorations, or close to restorations of these aircraft. NONE exist in a restored state. And the above aircraft are VERY significant aircraft in the big picture of WWII.

I'm very surprised that the Navy folks have no example of the TBD. I'm well aware of the TBD's that are under water in various locations. Who knows, maybe soon we will see an example of a fully restored TBD. This ship is a very important piece of Naval aviation history.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:29 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1143
Location: Caribou, Maine
Hello all,

Speaking just for types used operationally during WWII:

Any German multiple engine seaplane (except Do.24, of which I believe all surviving examples saw Spanish rather than German use).
Any part of the Dornier Do.17 family (incl. Do.17, 217, etc)

For American, to my mind the least well known American type that saw operational and combat use in WWII - and for which there is no survivors - is the Curtiss SOC Seagull.

Perhaps half of all Japanese basic types that saw operational use/combat now have no intact survivors. These include the "Claude" and "Tojo" fighters, "Helen" and many other bombers and every seaplane except "Rex" and "Emily".

The Polish and the Dutch had a number of indigenous designs, most of which do not survive. For the French, most of their fighter designs have at least one survivor, but few of the bomber and perhaps none of the short distance observation and Naval types survive.

Kevin
.

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:45 pm 
Offline
Potato
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:21 am
Posts: 1068
Location: Out of the loop
SC2 Seahawk

I don't know how significant, thats up for debate, but there were over 400 SC1's and SC2's made, and they did serve in the fleet.

SC2 with me, is kinda like the TBD with others. Why does this plane not exist?

_________________
DEEP THOUGHTS BY KIDS:
"If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world peace for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until the looting started. Age 15 "


Deep Thoughts,
Jack Handy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:42 pm
Posts: 210
Location: Wisconsin
old iron wrote:
Hello all,

Speaking just for types used operationally during WWII:

Any German multiple engine seaplane (except Do.24, of which I believe all surviving examples saw Spanish rather than German use).
Any part of the Dornier Do.17 family (incl. Do.17, 217, etc)

For American, to my mind the least well known American type that saw operational and combat use in WWII - and for which there is no survivors - is the Curtiss SOC Seagull.

Perhaps half of all Japanese basic types that saw operational use/combat now have no intact survivors. These include the "Claude" and "Tojo" fighters, "Helen" and many other bombers and every seaplane except "Rex" and "Emily".

The Polish and the Dutch had a number of indigenous designs, most of which do not survive. For the French, most of their fighter designs have at least one survivor, but few of the bomber and perhaps none of the short distance observation and Naval types survive.

Kevin
.



As to Japanese seaplanes, there is a submerged Kawanishi "Mavis" that was sunk by the allies on or about August 7th, 1942 at the seaplane base of Gavutu, near Tulagi and across the Channel from Guadalcanal. She lies in 20-30 feet of clear water right off the shore of the islet (Gavutu is only about 1 km long, but was the scene of fierce fighting for a few days).
I did photograph her shape in the water & will try to post it here when I have access to a scanner.
Trust I have the model correct, a 4 engine flying boat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 234
Location: Summerville, SC
What about these:

Focke-Wulf FW 200 "Condor"
Savoia-Marchetti S.M.79
Junkers Ju290
Henschel Hs129

_________________
Col Craig Duck
Life Member CAF
Life Member YAF
Life Member EAA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:48 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3299
Location: Phoenix, Az
Joe Scheil wrote:
The thread said what Significant types.

The only type that has been posted that was actually significant and correctly extinct is the Martin Maryland, Baltimore 167/187.


Joe,
check your facts, the B-32 fought the last air battles in WWII and suffered the last casulties. I think that qualifies.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:50 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3257
Location: New York
Hellcat wrote:
Yes, it is true that there are no "Betty's" that are complete in any way. It's too bad that the allies didn't save the betty's used in the surrender with the green crosses. At least one should have been saved. Any idea what happened to them?


The Smithsonian had a complete one at one point. But in the early days, late 1950s I think, when there was very little public interest and congressional funding in support of their efforts at aircraft preservation, they had to make some hard choices, and there was no place to put the whole Betty. So they chopped off the nose, and some other parts I believe, which they still have, and the rest was scrapped. Unfortunate, but it goes to show what a shoestring they worked on in those days.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
The Stirling is extinct, the Whitley I thought had one example recovered. I forgot about the Stirling, but feel free to add it to the list. As an aside I could care less about whoever you think would be cheesed that what I omitted is an insult. I'm not composing this list to be honorable to any group, just accountable to aviation history. There is a distinction.

The Stirling did form a part of Bomber Command during WWII, but as an aircraft had poor performance compared with the Halifax and the awesome Lancaster. The Lancaster is significant due to its record, technological acheivements, and its offspring. The Aircraft spawned planes that defended the British Isles for generations. The Stirling was not that advanced an aircraft comparitively, and preservation should if compiling an extinct aircraft wish list switch to the similar Short "C" class flying boat. If a Stirling is found, great, then preservation should be attempted. There are however plenty of other types, like the battleship scouts, that are significant to aviation as a kind of aircraft no longer used, versus a type to make a complete set.

The aircraft and engines that were consumed by the production machine of WWII aircraft production that are missing today are the biggest omission we have. 1925-1935 types from all powers, even British make the leap from WWI to WWII hard to bridge with remaining examples of definitive types...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:53 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3333
coldaffyduck wrote:
What about these:

Focke-Wulf FW 200 "Condor"
Savoia-Marchetti S.M.79
Junkers Ju290
Henschel Hs129

There's a Condor under restoration for the Berlin Technical Museum, and two complete SM.79s plus a fuselage survive in Italian collections.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group