Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jan 13, 2026 10:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:58 am
Posts: 469
Location: Montreal
Looks like lazy eights to me, nothing agressive... part of the basic maneuvers of the commercial rating, nothing most aircraft are not certified to do.

_________________
Michel C
Thousands of a/c pics at Passion-Aviation


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:08 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
rwdfresno your mentioning limitations, which is basically what I was referring to..is hoping that one does not exceed their limitations, and if you do, having a CFI (type rated) with you to basically save your a double s 8) we're cool. I just don't believe in "intentionally" putting an aircraft into an unusual attitude. It is however great to have the training to rectumfy the situation should you find yourself in the particular perdiccament 8)

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Last edited by gary1954 on Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:37 am
Posts: 830
Location: Chrishall Grange ~ England
The last picture was shot looking up at around 60 deg to the horizon at 14:24 British Summer Time. I was shooting facing the sun, which was almost directly above the airplane.

I would judge that he was past the vertical ( 90 deg ) but I couldn't say by how much but given the amount of sunlight hitting the under surface of the wing it must have been another 15 / 20 degrees ?

_________________
Blue Skies .....

Peter

Consolidated by US state ~ see if there's a heavy bomber tour stop coming to an airport near you ...... http://www.bomberflight.info

Warbirdapps on facebook ~ every day a new image from my personal journey thru the world of warbirds ..... https://www.facebook.com/Warbirdapps


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 3:13 pm
Posts: 20
Funny... I've seen that exact B-25 fly its display routine dozens of times and never thought of it as dangerous flying. Looking forward to seeing it again on Friday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:36 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
bipe215 wrote:
warbird1 wrote:
gary1954 wrote:
Is it really "Necessary" to roll the B-25 beyond 90 degrees, or even to 90 degrees if actually unwarranted. Does this not fall into "unusual attitude", Personally, I cannot see intentionally placing an aircraft in an unusual attitude unless accompained by a CFI (but this is just my opinion)
The Mitchell sounded sweet though, saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaweeeeeeet 8)


That's what happens when you get big-headed pilots who try to "outdo" everyone else just to stroke their own egos. I don't really see it as necessary either, but it's their airplane. The FAA considers anything beyond 90 degrees of bank aerobatics. I don't know what the rules are in Great Britain and Europe, though.

I'm sure at least one of those pilots is a CFI. Warbirds are not generally flown by low time or just private pilots. Though there are exceptions, most warbird pilots are exceptionally qualified with many years of experience.


Actually, the FAA considers anything past 60 degrees acro. Don't know what the rules state across the pond. In the big wingover this guy is doing, the aircraft is basically in a ballistic arc over the top. No stress and no problem if he does it right and it looks like he knows his airplane pretty well. This isn't to say he can't screw up, just the maneuver itself isn't particularly hazardous.

Steve G


Thanks for the info, Steve G. It's been 20+ years since I took my private pilot written, so I was going from memory. Your comment got me to thinking, so I looked it up in the FAR's. Here is what it says:




Sec. 91.303

Aerobatic flight.

No person may operate an aircraft in aerobatic flight--
(a) Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement;
(b) Over an open air assembly of persons;
(c) Within the lateral boundaries of the surface areas of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designated for an airport;
(d) Within 4 nautical miles of the center line of any Federal airway;
(e) Below an altitude of 1,500 feet above the surface; or
(f) When flight visibility is less than 3 statute miles.

For the purposes of this section, aerobatic flight means an intentional maneuver involving an abrupt change in an aircraft's attitude, an abnormal attitude, or abnormal acceleration, not necessary for normal flight.




So, according to this, aerobatic flight has a nebulous meaning, subject to interpretation. With that last statement, the FAA could really hang you on just about anything other than very mild maneuvering.

As far as the 60 degrees bank comment, a parachute is required only if you will be exceeding this value. Unless there is another place in the FAR's, 60 degrees of bank doesn't define aerobatics, it only says that a parachute is necessary. In the following excerpt, it doesn't link 60 degrees of bank to aerobatics, only to parachutes. The FAR for that is here:





Sec. 91.307

Parachutes and parachuting.

(a) No pilot of a civil aircraft may allow a parachute that is available for emergency use to be carried in that aircraft unless it is an approved type and--
(1) If a chair type (canopy in back), it has been packed by a certificated and appropriately rated parachute rigger within the preceding 120 days; or
(2) If any other type, it has been packed by a certificated and appropriately rated parachute rigger--
(i) Within the preceding 120 days, if its canopy, shrouds, and harness are composed exclusively of nylon, rayon, or other similar synthetic fiber or materials that are substantially resistant to damage from mold, mildew, or other fungi and other rotting agents propagated in a moist environment; or
(ii) Within the preceding 60 days, if any part of the parachute is composed of silk, pongee, or other natural fiber, or materials not specified in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
[(b) Except in an emergency, no pilot in command may allow, and no person may conduct, a parachute operation from an aircraft within the United States except in accordance with Part 105 of this chapter.]
(c) Unless each occupant of the aircraft is wearing an approved parachute, no pilot of a civil aircraft carrying any person (other than a crewmember) may execute any intentional maneuver that exceeds--
(1) A bank of 60 degrees relative to the horizon; or
(2) A nose-up or nose-down attitude of 30 degrees relative to the horizon.

(d) Paragraph (c) of this section does not apply to--
(1) Flight tests for pilot certification or rating; or
(2) Spins and other flight maneuvers required by the regulations for any certificate or rating when given by--
(i) A certificated flight instructor; or
(ii) An airline transport pilot instructing in accordance with Sec. 61.67 of this chapter.
(e) For the purposes of this section, approved parachute means--
(1) A parachute manufactured under a type certificate or a technical standard order (C-23 series); or
(2) A personnel-carrying military parachute identified by an NAF, AAF, or AN drawing number, an AAF order number, or any other military designation or specification number.



Nice discussion, and I learned something new! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:56 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4434
Location: Maypearl, Texas
bipe215 wrote:
I think we worry too much.

Steve G


Roger that :wink: Just keep the power up, it will be OK and don't get slow. I have been rolled hard in the Hawker behind a 757, you just have to stay with it and fly the A/C..... 8)

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group