Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 11:57 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re-engined Sea Fury Qs
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 9:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
The Sea Fury's always been one of my favs, among the sexiest a/c ever made. I've been curious about them being converted to R-4360s & R-3350s. It seems the -3350 is more common, at least for non-racing ones. It seems the obvious choice for stock looks at least, except for losing the 5 blade prop. Too bad there's not a suitable 5 blader for a -3350, that's one of the things that makes it a Sea Fury! Anyway, I've read the Centaurus was pretty difficult to maintain, so I see that point for the change as well. Why, tho, the -3350? Why not an R-2800? Availibility? Just exactly, without having to right a book at least, is involved in converting to the -3350? Also, from what I've read, displcement wise, the Centaurus compared to the -3350, but most of the -3350s were capable of more power, so how much does that increase its performance or is the -3350 generally derated or what? I don't especially care about the conversion to -4360 power, but if someone has & wants to provide some info on that conversion, I'd be intersted to know, anyway. Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:52 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
famvburg wrote:
The Sea Fury's always been one of my favs, among the sexiest a/c ever made. I've been curious about them being converted to R-4360s & R-3350s. It seems the -3350 is more common, at least for non-racing ones. It seems the obvious choice for stock looks at least, except for losing the 5 blade prop. Too bad there's not a suitable 5 blader for a -3350, that's one of the things that makes it a Sea Fury! Anyway, I've read the Centaurus was pretty difficult to maintain, so I see that point for the change as well. Why, tho, the -3350? Why not an R-2800? Availibility? Just exactly, without having to right a book at least, is involved in converting to the -3350? Also, from what I've read, displcement wise, the Centaurus compared to the -3350, but most of the -3350s were capable of more power, so how much does that increase its performance or is the -3350 generally derated or what? I don't especially care about the conversion to -4360 power, but if someone has & wants to provide some info on that conversion, I'd be intersted to know, anyway. Thanks.

IIRC the 3350 is closer to displacement and power of the Centaurus. It also is physically closer in dimension and weight so the cowling and looks can be kept closer to the original. The Prop is located in close to the same location as well as is the exhaust and cowl flaps. That is why they look close to the original.
The 4360 is different in all of the above.
Rich

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 112 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group