Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 5:29 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:25 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
wow jack!! talk about sticker shock. the old addage "the difference of men & boys depends on the price of their toys" is 100% accurate!! what does a guy like kermit weeks & tallichett do?? print the $$$$ in their basement daily?? yikes!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: $$$$$$
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:36 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Check this thread for 1 possible answer.
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2994

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 11:08 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
HarvardIV wrote:
I suppose you could fly it with $250k coverage, and just let a really good pilot fly it every time. However, the question is would the operators be willing to do it?
Does insurance work that way? Normally you pay for hull coverage and the insurance company decides if the aircraft is totaled or rebuilt. If the insurance company totals the aircraft, you get $250k and they get the plane!

On another note, I suspect Lefty Gardner's P-38 was self-insured for hull damage. Those are the risks you take, and the crash landing was unavoidable (from a pilot's perspective).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $$$$$$
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:39 pm 
Offline
Potato
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:21 am
Posts: 1068
Location: Out of the loop
Jack Cook wrote:


Those are some good points. I always thought that the majority of the museum "Loans" were to get rid of the tax burden on an extremely expensive aircraft, not necessarily to restore them, although I know that happens also.

In California, they'll dink you with a sales tax that pretty much equals 10 percent of the airplanes cost. They have a way of charging you no matter if the plane was purchased here or not. In the counties around where I live they charge 1 percent a year in taxes.

P-51= 1.5 mil
State sales tax= 150k
County tax= 15k per year

Chunk in insurance, gas, maintenance, training......whew...I've heard numbers far exceeding 1000 dollars an hour to operate these planes.

I'm not sure about this, someone correct me if I'm wrong please, but, If you have 5 30+ year old planes, you can call yourself a museum and get a tax break. If you have 1 plane, you can show it 12 times a year, of which 6 cannot be at your home airfield. This will exempt you from the county tax. I agree with this use of the tax code because it gets the planes out and about and we can see more of them, and the hangars are open on the weekend for "Museum" planes.

As far as restoreing a plane.....I'm not sure what to think about that. I've been asked to donate to a plane restoration non-profit before. I asked a few questions like,

Q: Who owns the plane? The non-profit?
A: Daddy owns it. It's on long term loan.

Q: Wheres the plane at?
A: In daddys hangar.

Q: Who will operate the plane?
A: Daddy.

Q: Can I go see the plane?
A: No.

Q: Can I help work on it?
A: No.

Q: Why should I give this project money then?
A: Because its a tax deduction for you, and you'll be helping get a rare warbird back into the sky.

The conversation ended there with me being thought of as the biggest ahole of the day.

I figured it out, that is an abuse of both the tax system and more importantly, peoples trust.

I like the tax deduction, but, If I'm going to shell out for that, It'll go to outfits like Collings or a museum that allows donors to participate in some way other than cash.

_________________
DEEP THOUGHTS BY KIDS:
"If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world peace for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until the looting started. Age 15 "


Deep Thoughts,
Jack Handy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 1:35 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Talking to the "aircraft coordinator" for the Stars and Stripes wing of the CONFEDERATE Air Force in '03, I was told that they wanted $15,000 to bring "Glacier Girl" to Frederick, MD for a static display. CAF said, "No thanks." And I do believe Steve Hinton is the only guy they'll allow to fly her. He's also an American Airlines airplane driver and has to comply with that schedule first.

Mudge the P-38 fan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 12:13 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Mudge wrote:
He's also an American Airlines airplane driver and has to comply with that schedule first.
Really? Are you sure you aren't thinking of Ray Dieckman?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 12:23 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Yes, I could be wrong but I don't think so.
I was wrong once. I believe it was in 1953 but I might be mistaken :roll:

Mudge the trustworthy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
Somebody better let Hinton know that he's an American Airlines pilot now!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:51 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
O.P.........

Quote:
I'm not sure about this, someone correct me if I'm wrong please, but, If you have 5 30+ year old planes, you can call yourself a museum and get a tax break. If you have 1 plane, you can show it 12 times a year, of which 6 cannot be at your home airfield. This will exempt you from the county tax. I agree with this use of the tax code because it gets the planes out and about and we can see more of them, and the hangars are open on the weekend for "Museum" planes.


I must say again, only in Claeforniaaa.

If they don't tax your house, they tax your plane. Come to sunny Arizona were the taxes are cheap, and the ladies don't know they're pretty!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $$$$$$
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:05 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:14 pm
Posts: 1678
Location: Oslo, NORWAY
O.P. wrote:
Jack Cook wrote:


Those are some good points. I always thought that the majority of the museum "Loans" were to get rid of the tax burden on an extremely expensive aircraft, not necessarily to restore them, although I know that happens also.

In California, they'll dink you with a sales tax that pretty much equals 10 percent of the airplanes cost. They have a way of charging you no matter if the plane was purchased here or not. In the counties around where I live they charge 1 percent a year in taxes.

P-51= 1.5 mil
State sales tax= 150k
County tax= 15k per year

Chunk in insurance, gas, maintenance, training......whew...I've heard numbers far exceeding 1000 dollars an hour to operate these planes.

I'm not sure about this, someone correct me if I'm wrong please, but, If you have 5 30+ year old planes, you can call yourself a museum and get a tax break. If you have 1 plane, you can show it 12 times a year, of which 6 cannot be at your home airfield. This will exempt you from the county tax. I agree with this use of the tax code because it gets the planes out and about and we can see more of them, and the hangars are open on the weekend for "Museum" planes.

As far as restoreing a plane.....I'm not sure what to think about that. I've been asked to donate to a plane restoration non-profit before. I asked a few questions like,

Q: Who owns the plane? The non-profit?
A: Daddy owns it. It's on long term loan.

Q: Wheres the plane at?
A: In daddys hangar.

Q: Who will operate the plane?
A: Daddy.

Q: Can I go see the plane?
A: No.

Q: Can I help work on it?
A: No.

Q: Why should I give this project money then?
A: Because its a tax deduction for you, and you'll be helping get a rare warbird back into the sky.

The conversation ended there with me being thought of as the biggest ahole of the day.

I figured it out, that is an abuse of both the tax system and more importantly, peoples trust.

I like the tax deduction, but, If I'm going to shell out for that, It'll go to outfits like Collings or a museum that allows donors to participate in some way other than cash.

It that possibly the reason you see some US based Warbirds fly the flag of convenience of a Delaware company....?

T J


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 12:03 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Ok...Maybe I'm wrong about where Steve Hinton works but I don't really need the sarcasm, Mr. Veich.

Mudge the evidently misinformed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 12:49 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
Hi Mudge:

I think Mr. Hinton "lurks" on this board, so I don't think Mr. Veich is being sarcastic. A few of these guys are probably his wingman sometimes..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
No sarcasm or offense intended, only humor. My appologies if any toes were stepped on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 5:45 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Mudge wrote:
Yes, I could be wrong but I don't think so.
I was wrong once. I believe it was in 1953 but I might be mistaken :roll:

Mudge the trustworthy
That's twice now Mr. Mudge! Once more and you'll be demoted from Lance Corporal. :shock:

Hmmmm... I wonder what's below a Lance Corporal? Maybe a Bowie Knife Corporal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Airline Pilot Rating
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 7:11 am
Posts: 288
Location: Ohio
This one will have to stop right here.!! Steve is NOT a Pilot with American Airlines. there have been discussions of another qualified pilot or two for Glacier Girl but that has not happened just yet. Glacier Girl will attend some show in 2005, but there is the scheduling thing that has to happen first. Steve fly's The Air Museum P-38 first for Heritage Flights, then they try to fly GG at other times.
8)

_________________
FLY SAFE--FLY FAST
F4U Corsair Historian
Mint Moore III


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group