JDK wrote:
A bunch of W.W.II eara pics and some optimistic hypothesising do not recoveries make, guys.
Awe James, always the nay sayer. No one is saying that the aircraft depicted in this thread are still sitting there, waiting for the ever diligent adventurer to stumble upon them. The original premise of this thread was of the likelyhood of aircraft still remaining in situ over the vast expanse of what was the North African campaign (5 countries) . I think one would be foolish to assume that there is absolutely nothing at all. In this scenario I believe the odds are in favor of the resilient.
But there have been cases where
W.W.II era pics and lore have led to recoveries. Examples: Swamp Ghost, My Gal Sal, and Glacier Girl to name a few.
JDK wrote:
marine air wrote:
I think there are a lot of wrecks in Africa. the nations are so poor that the people don't have a means to round up an airplane and sell the scrap metal.
JDK wrote:
Wrong. An amazing amount has been scrapped and melted down - even from the desert and minefields.
Care to expand on how you know this? That's quite a blanket statement, and I'm not saying you're in error, but it should require some supporting evidence while making it. Besides, no one is saying that some scrapping hasn't occured. I think the popular belief is that there alot of open areas inbetween all the dotted pin pricks of civilization. Places where downed aircraft and misplaced equipment, would have gone unoticed in the passing decades. LBG is good example. Not on any travelled routes it layed undisturbed for 15 years until spotted from the air. It was only because of the bomber that people visited that stretch of land until it was finally moved in 1994 and I willing to bet the no one has visited that spot since. Why should they?
JDK wrote:
marine air wrote:
SO like in Afghanistan and Iraq, where they are finding rare British airplanes and some W.W.I tanks and other collectibles, it should be a gold mine.
JDK wrote:
Very different, actually.
How so? Very similar set of circumstances and varibles. Wide open tracks of arid countries with sporatic pockets of existance, where military confrontation left a significant amounts of material in it's wake. With groups indigenous peoples who have neither the interest or the ability to care about non-functioning military gear. Establishing their country's infrstructure seems to be more preoccupying these days. But, if you want to build up your stock pile of T-72 and BMP parts and assemblies, Afghanistan is where you go. Different yes, but not indifferent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03nuZk-vbD8JDK wrote:
Quote:
The airplanes found over there should be corrosion free, and most undamaged parts can be expected to be airworthy.
JDK wrote:
Wow! Apart from guesswork, how do you know this?
Lets not be condescending shall we? We're all grown ups here.
I've seen pictures of airframes and ground vehicles in the deserts of North Africa that were routinely scoured by Mother Nature's media blaster. Leaving them as bright and clean as the day they were smithed at the factory. Probalbly better. By the USAF's own account during the recovery of LBG's crew, it was found that after 15 years of exposure LBG's Radios and Brownings were still in servicable (operable) condition. In fact the state of preservation that LBG was in led to several of her assemblies being recovered for the purpose of studying the enviromental affects on various components of airframes. Granted that was only after 15 years and not 60 plus in a sandy hot dry enviroment, but no one is asking to hop in a derelict P-40, start her up and fly her out. Although it should mentioned the after 50 years in snow, ice and water Glacier Girl's .50 cal and 20mm cannon were test fired successfully at the recovery site. So being honest with ourselves, we as a whole have to realize that there are too many varibles to negate positive or negative conditions for preservation. I'm sure in North Africa one might find instances of remarkable states of preservation and other less than mentionable.
JDK wrote:
Quote:
Also conditions were rugged so there should be a high number of single engine airplanes that had engine problems due to the conditions and were landed a little more gently than those shot down.
JDK wrote:
Neato. If they couldn't pick them up with wartime facilities, it'd be a breeze for a foreign civillian group to get 'em out, eh?
Aside from your tone. I don't think you make a valid point. No one made the comment that anything regarding Warbirds would be easy. But just as I'm sure you have read here on WIX "foreign civillian groups" here recently have been successful in recovering aircraft from less than hospitable places, whether due to political or enviromental issues. Again Swamp Ghost and the group of Japanese airframes recovered front the Soloman Islands. A breeze? No not a breeze but still worth all the persistance and planning (Logistics) it would take.
JDK wrote:
Quote:
Post war, many airplanes were given to those countries like Vampires and Spitfires, etc. They couldn't even afford to put fuel in them, much less pay for maintenance. There should be a lot of very low time airframes at some of those military bases that are closed off to the public.
JDK wrote:
Bit warmer. Actually most of the N African ones have been blown up, trashed or 'recovered' some illegally, with significant follow up issues. Those that are still there are marked - by warbird searchers who know their business AND the current owners.
No comment really. I have to assume you know what your talking about. And with that being said, I would love to hear some example case and points as I find it interesting. If you please, indulge me.
JDK wrote:
Quote:
Another reason why the ones pushed in the weeds at the airbases won't be picked over too much is in many cases they have been placed in mine fields and are still very dangerous. Same with a lot of South american countries.
JDK wrote:
Great pitch, where do we sent the money to?
Seriously though, I've talked to
the guys that have looked, not sat somewhere guessing. One of them posted above.
They aren't there. Those that are are mostly known, and many of those are just not worth recovering - the SAAB B-17 (some recovered with the Ethiopian Fireflies) and C-47s etc.
There are more potential warbirds on USAF airbases... They'd be easier to get, too.

Regards,
So because of the "guys" you've "talked" to, that's be all and end all? I seriously doubt that your friends no matter how qualified they might be have combed the deserts in their entirety in search of what's out there. If anything I have to guess what they went after is what they got tips on or heard of second hand. Which means people had been in proximity of the artifacts. I think what Marine Air was getting at was what's laying out in the obscure areas not ventured by man but once every hundreds of years.
Regardless I don't think it's appropriate to interject into anyone's thoughts or opinions with negative equally opinionated unsubstantiated comments. Nobody here is an 100% authority on anything. I've read your posts and on more than a few occasions you've made statements, like the one above, when someone talks about the "idea" of going to another country to recover an aircraft. Which to me atleast boils down to "Americans stay within your borders and concern yourself with the aircaft you have there". Not attempting to be offensive, but you've struck this cord more than once and that's how I've read it. How many times has History been marked by those that said it couldn't be done only to be proven wrong by those with the will to try? I'm sure one day an outstanding recovery originating from the North African Campaign will be made. So what do you say we just allow anyone and everyone to think creatively and continue to spur on thought and imagination?
V/R
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis