Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 5:58 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:42 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:39 pm
Posts: 1817
Location: Irving, Texas
Bill just wants the "Bill and Hillary show" back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:10 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:37 pm
Posts: 1197
What I want to know is why we arn't on 2 planets ( MARS, MOON ECT) by now... Vonbraun saw the shuttle as a waste of Time and I agree.. A stunt show. It doesn't even leave earths orbit. We should have been building bigger Saturn IV rockets and been on the moon by now! It was 10 years from zero to the moon and almost 30 years has passed and we are status quoe... I never saw the future as it is now....Disaponinted... When I went on the VIP tour not the bus tour but the real VIp tour.. I went into the vechile assy building and the shuttle prossesing center and engine shop. Pretty impressive but along ways from where we should have been.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
any highly technical luxuries or necessities which all civilian people take for granted now days can be attributed to the research, & developement of the space program & the military. the computer had it's humble beginnings with both entities........ & the list of progress now goes on!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:33 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
We've gotten much more out of space than the war on poverty. Maritime terrestrial and airborne navigation have never been safer. Many plastics and adhesives also can be traced to space.

What advances can be traced to the trillions spent on the war on poverty?

BTW
How green are fuel cells? You have to burn coal to make the H2 and O2 for the fuel cell. Water vapor is also a green house gas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: NASA Spinoffs
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:01 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Huntsville, AL
Bill,
I work for NASA in the Space Shuttle Program. I disagree with your post wholeheartedly. Rather than try and convey to you the benefits in this limited space I point you to the following websites:

http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/

http://www.thespaceplace.com/nasa/spinoffs.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Spino ... A_spinoffs

There are many more sites out there.

By the way, we have flown 10 space shuttle missions from 2005 thru 2008.

Shep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Beautiful Downtown Natick, MA
Problems with the internet...always make me suspicious of the rest of the stuff.
Gary found a list of things supposedly the result of the Space Race and I think a lot of those are accurate, but...that list also claimed that satellites allowed us to see the assassination of JFK. Well, that would be false. There was a not a live broadcast from the grassy knoll, otherwise the Zapruder film would be insignificant. We did see Oswald get it in the basement "live" and we did see everything related to the funeral "live" that weekend.
When I see that type of mis-statement, I am suspicious of the accuracy of the rest of that list.
No offense meant to Gary..ever...he's one of my personal warbird hero's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: war
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:57 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
O2, well I am not too convinced when I ask a question and the answer is that you give a question about another topic and another program., rather than real, direct, and concrete returns to the taxpayer.

The war on poverty was not part of my topic or my question nor the space program. But if it was, that program has provided food, housing, health care and job training, especially for kids, the handicapped and others with less than we have. It is not a big cool techno thing like a rocket , but some folks, especially at Christmas time might consider that worthwhile.

Now I am not an expert on Jesus or the Bible, but in all the readings or programs I have seen about him, I don't recall any where he was advocating more weapons and more machines over human welfare.

Shep, you work for NASA and you disagree with me. That's not too much of a surprise is it? At least you are honest enough to reveal the source of your bias.And I took a look at your sites, I agree NASA has a good PR arm. But I still can't get too excited that better golf balls and swim suits is much of a return on investment for the average taxpayer. If this stuff was really all that valuable then NASA could operate as a commercial enterprise making a profit off these sales rather than as a drain on taxpayers. They sure don't do that.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Last edited by Bill Greenwood on Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:00 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
The last few Apollo launches got me out of the classroom in early grade school for school assemblies so we could all watch the Saturn V rocket lift off the pad so it was worth it to me. Plus it gave way to some really cool lunch boxes. Way better to spend money on the space program and the technological dividends it paid than all the "Great Society" money wasted on solving nothing and only creating an ever growing dependent welfare class--but crucial voting blocks for self-serving politicians in both parties. And now, back to our regularly scheduled programming... Bill, any updates on your Spitfire?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:11 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
It's all very well being critical, Bill, but your presumption is flawed.

Talk to any research scientist about 'return on investment' and you should get a blank look. Sadly too many of them are now used to parroting various responses about as reliably as those whose jobs are about return on investment - and who currently have dug us all into a fine mess. At least no-one was expecting a profit from the space race.

The work of the space scientists (globally) is a modern mix of exploration and science discovery. It's not about finding gold over the next horizon, but because humanity needs to strive to reach further than before.

'Because it's there'.

As for someone working for NASA having a bias, at least he's happy working for them - unlike those of us who have been sharing about the issues of working for the airlines etc.

Cheers,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:01 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Huntsville, AL
Bill,

We can agree to disagree. However, to put it all into perspective, NASA's current FY 2008 budget of $17.318 billion represents about 0.6% of the $2.9 trillion United States federal budget.

Shep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: .6%
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:27 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Shep Jr, NASA's budget is only .6% of the US total so it's ok if much of it is boondoggle and not a benefit to most people.

Now O J only killed 2 of about 300,000 people, which is .000006 %, so why even pay any attention to that or even have a trial?

And JDK, "humanity needs to strive to reach further than before" and "because it's there". If that is not a pile of amorphous BS then I haven't seen one. If the govt takes our taxes to build a road or a hospital or a school or a retirement fund or an airport, we get something back for our money. Maybe not all for everyone, but there is a direct benefit. Not so with space.

By the way, JDK on another topic, I had a lot more respect for your postings and your opinions on WIX before you became a junior censor. Perhaps you missed your calling, Gonzales beat you to it.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Last edited by Bill Greenwood on Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .6%
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:36 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Bill, I don't think you've got any converts on this one! I'm happy to see you play iconoclast, but I'm not with you here. I have 0 interest in space, but I don't think your view works. It's not about investment, but exploration and science. I don't think measuring spinoffs is important either.

And the the comparison to murder isn't really on.

Fair enough to throw up the question in the air, but time to consider why you're looking real lonely on the topic - is it 'everyone else', or might it just be 'you'? ;)

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:01 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Huntsville, AL
Like I said we can agree to disagree. You have made up your mind that the NASA mission is worthless and you are entitled to your opinion. However, I am entitled to mine and other members of this forum are entitled to their opinions. It is my opinion that your OJ analogy is like comparing apples to oranges and is really not relevant to the arguement.

PS, there is a lot of job satisfaction working on a vehicle that can go from 0 to 17,500 mph in 8 1/2 minutes.

Shep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:45 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
sheppjr,

Are you related at all to Alan Sheppard, or are you just using that name because you hold him in high esteem?

Just curious. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:01 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Huntsville, AL
Nope not related. His last name is spelled with 1 p and mine is spelled with 2. I have been asked that question at least 50 times over the last 20 years. Shep is just an old college nickname.

Shep


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group