Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 5:00 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:13 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1131
It took just about 10 months to get all the paperwork, leg work and loadplans approved but I finally got the T-6 shipped to Hawaii. It took several trips to different T-6's to measure, test fit and finally weld up the tiedowns and come up with a plan that I could get approved by the Air Force. I doubt most people know there is about ten different styles of lower landing gear legs for the T-6 family. Originally it was supposed to go in a C-17 but a reserve C-5 took the mission. Everything pretty much loads the same and I did the certification letter for either airplane.

I was supposed to go take the plane apart, load it, fly with it, unload it and put it back together but everything happened just as I was going to Reno. The C-5 guys didn't tie it down exactly the way I had wanted it done but they did a fair job. Nothing got damaged.



Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Now Hawaii has a flying T-6.

Image

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:26 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5209
Location: Stratford, CT.
:shock: Wow! Awesome! Some lucky owner is probably having the time of his life scooting around those islands. 8)

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:44 pm 
Offline
Newly Minted Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:40 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Altamonte Springs, FL (SFB)
Neat stuff. My question is; How did you get the USAF agree to haul it?I didn't know that they would do that.

_________________
David
1953 M38A1 jeep owner
& Student Pilot soloed 09/09/06
USAF 1984-1986


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:45 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
That's pretty cool. How does one go about getting the Air Force to ship a plane?

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:19 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
My god the AF jet hauling a former Navy a/c owned by a guy who was in the Coast Guard!
What's next, you going to tell me Roger Ramjet isn't a real guy :shock: :twisted: :wink: :wink:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 788
Location: Washington State
A new museum exhibit? Perhaps the one at Pearl Harbor?

I'm pretty sure that unless you have photos of a General or Senator
doing something very wrong, the USAF is not in the business of transporting private aircraft across the Pacific.


Back in the 50s when most bases had aero clubs, they did transport a few planes for them. Somewhere there is a photo of a Mooney Mite being unloaded from the nose of a C-124.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:29 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Curious indeed, just wonder what behind the scenes "strangeness" occurred?!?! Here is an Official AF press release, apparently shipped for an Air Show....WHY is still a bit of a mystery!?!?!
http://www.travis.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123168195

_________________
Image
Aviation Illustration Website
http://shepartstudio.com/illustration/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:09 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm
Posts: 2184
Location: Waukesha, WI
Round trip or one way? :shock:

_________________
"There are old pilots and bold pilots but few old, bold pilots."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:58 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1131
Holedigger wrote:
Curious indeed, just wonder what behind the scenes "strangeness" occurred?!?! Here is an Official AF press release, apparently shipped for an Air Show....WHY is still a bit of a mystery!?!?!
http://www.travis.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123168195


There was no "strangeness" involved. As to WHY well just like the press release says. It was for the Hickam airshow. There isn't a lot of warbirds to choose from in Hawaii and even less that are interested in flying across the pacific to get there. In this case, the Air Force wanted a T-6 for their show. The owner is a local guy and they asked if he'd be interested in being in the airshow. He said yes but the plane was in Nevada. Other civilian acts , including the Red Bull helicopter, were sought but for whatever reason they never came to fruition.

I did all the certifications and planning that were required to make sure the T-6 could be prepped and loaded with as much ease as possible. The Air Force called and said they would have a plane with space reserved for the airshow planes at Travis AFB on a certain date. It was up to the owner to get it there, get it prepped and certified in time. The reason it wound up being a C-5 instead of a C-17 is they found one that was going to Hickam anyhow to pick up a load of cargo. As I said in the first post, I would have been there to take care of all that but it ended up happening when I was headed to the races at Reno. So I had to leave it to other people that didn't know me or the airplane. This resulted in phone calls back and forth between me and the guys at Travis while I was in the airport.

This has nothing to do with the museum at Pearl Harbor. There was nothing sneaky, underhanded or illeagle done by anybody. Because the owner knows me he had a little bit of an inside track as far as the process goes and I was able to make things a little easier, but not much. Everywhere we turned, we were met with the Air Force's favorite answer "That's not my job."

The bottom line is that the Air Force doesn't ship privately owned stuff unless there is something in it for them. It has to be done on a space available basis and can't result in costing the Air Force anything. Empty airplanes fly all over the world all the time but we can't just put whatever we want in them. I certainly wish we could though!

In the past, this has been done with a Stearman and a Corsair that I'm aware of. I've recently been asked to look into working up loading instructions for other warbirds in the future.

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 11:18 pm
Posts: 142
Brad,
as a taxpayer I am .........., forget that last thought, is that the t-6 that we used to play with here? If it is we all need to gang up on the owner and plan a holiday........
Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:43 am
Posts: 441
Location: Graham, Tx
REALLY cool, thanks for sharing the story!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Meant no offense, just seemed a bit "odd" for a civilian ANYTHING getting moved by the Air Force. The order would have had to come down the chain of command that they WANTED more aircraft at the Air Show and to lend a hand, and SOP would be to use a flight deadheading or training to do it. I imagine local commanders wouldn't touch it unless it was given a green light from above. It is NOT like the average warbird operator can just go to the Air Force and "ask" for a lift. Sometimes they can work odd cases into "aircraft recovery" training exercises, but that is not a real frequent event for privately owned AC.

_________________
Image
Aviation Illustration Website
http://shepartstudio.com/illustration/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:58 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Holedigger wrote:
Meant no offense, just seemed a bit "odd" for a civilian ANYTHING getting moved by the Air Force.
Well, if moving Keiko the whale via C-17 was OK, this should be as well!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:06 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The CAF Corsair and another plane were flown via C-5 up to Eielson AFB for the airshow there several years back. There's pictures on the Corsair website of it being parked in front of the C-5, loaded aboard, and then being unloaded.

Also, the USAF has rules where it can transport civilian payloads under certain circumstances for pay. In fact, before the Antonov's became available, the 2 C-5C's were the only way any Delta II's and Atlas IV's got to the pad and the way many private and public payloads for them got transported. The companies involved fully compensated (and then some on occasion) the USAF for use of their aircraft and crews in such situations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:32 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
Well, if moving Keiko the whale via C-17 was OK, this should be as well!

Ha I was waiting for this to be brought up.
I was hoping the C-17 would have a multi-engine failure and give that ol boy a float test about half way there. :shock: :twisted:
What a friggin waste of many millions of dollars :!:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 264 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group