sdennison wrote:
Jack Cook wrote:
That seems so odd. Because a depth charge is just a bomb that explodes underwater.
It basically destroys by the water it displaces. Used on land it's just a small bomb with
not much difference in effectiveness I can understand (or maybe less effectiveness due
to having a thin casing).
Jack, from what I have been able to gather, the concussion was all they were after and apparently, it was effective in the tunnels and caves especially. I am not sure why these would be more effective than a 500 lb fragmentation bomb other than the thin skin might change the explosion. Open for opinions but they certainly were used.
I think it relates to the type of explosive used. I believe the 500# iron bomb used TNT or
amatol. The later mines used Torpex..which if I remember correctly give about a 30% bigger
bang for the buck. Long time since sub school..sooooo
The weights and period...later in the war..suggest your dad dropped the MK 9 depth charge.
In reading the manual, a setting (M), arms the DC but blocks the hydrostatic mechanism to
the detonator pistol. I'm guessing it becomes a contact device at that point.
http://www.hnsa.org/doc/depthcharge9/index.htm