Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:16 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:22 pm
Posts: 1776
Location: Seattle
airnutz wrote:
spookythecat wrote:
I believe it's the paint scheme of an aircraft Arthur Spielberg (Steven's father) flew on.

Steven's dad is Arnold Spielberg who flew for a short time(2 missions) with the 490th BS, 341st BG, 10th AF....As a radioman/gunner, until they found he could fix the radios, among other things so they grounded him.

An interview with Arnold from 2006, the part where he gets to India/Burma is about half way down the page...With some details of the "Burma Bridge Busters" technique...
http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/Intervie ... rnold.html


OOPS! I meant Arnold. :rolleyes:

_________________
-Al Sauer
http://www.flickr.com/photos/spookythecat


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:18 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
spookythecat wrote:
airnutz wrote:
spookythecat wrote:
I believe it's the paint scheme of an aircraft Arthur Spielberg (Steven's father) flew on.

Steven's dad is Arnold Spielberg who flew for a short time(2 missions) with the 490th BS, 341st BG, 10th AF....As a radioman/gunner, until they found he could fix the radios, among other things so they grounded him.

An interview with Arnold from 2006, the part where he gets to India/Burma is about half way down the page...With some details of the "Burma Bridge Busters" technique...
http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/Intervie ... rnold.html


OOPS! I meant Arnold. :rolleyes:

No worries Spooky, I didn't know to look till you mentioned it. I was checking for any new stuff about the Lake Dianchi P-40 last month and remembered a Spielberg connection with your mention! The Rutgers interview came up and here we are! Ain't WIX wunnerfull, wunnerful? :wink:

Do you KNOW if Arnold flew any(or his 2) missions on 810? Given his role..they were ALL his birds, but in his bio it was obvious he copped a ride every now and then.. :D

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:50 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2707
Location: NP, NJ, USA
airnutz wrote:

Do you KNOW if Arnold flew any(or his 2) missions on 810? Given his role..they were ALL his birds, but in his bio it was obvious he copped a ride every now and then.. :D



Just sent an email to the ROHA director asking if Mr. Spielberg had shared any pictures or more detailed info. His interview was about a year before I joined them.

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:56 am
Posts: 843
The panel is actually a DV window in the clear and removable in flight or on ground . Many aircraft of the era had those. [Look at DC-3's eg.]

{DV = Direct View/vision]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:16 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:31 pm
Posts: 1352
Location: Galveston County
rwdfresno wrote:
(as you likely know but I like to hear myself sound important lol)

Ha ha. Thanks to all for adding these little bits 'n' pieces, they are greatly appreciated! I thought I knew a thing or two about B-25s once, but that was before I joined WIX. :shock:

_________________
Cheers,
Kurt Maurer
League City, Texas

PIC, Ford 6600 pulling Rhino batwing up and down the runway


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:09 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 1454
Location: Colorado
Invader26 wrote:
The panel is actually a DV window in the clear and removable in flight or on ground . Many aircraft of the era had those. [Look at DC-3's eg.]

{DV = Direct View/vision]


Yes, that would be the top panel I believe. I think the previous posters are still accurate as they were responding to the original question regarding the lower panel which is where the external metal piece comes into play. Both of these panels and the remaining portion of the pilot's windscreen were eventually simplified in many cases back to the B-25 - B-25D single panel during post war upgrades.

Ryan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:56 am
Posts: 843
My B-25 had the DV windscreen . I think it looks best. The piece of armour plate screwed in below the DV window.

I don't think any B-25's are flying with that done. Looks the part.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:47 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 1454
Location: Colorado
Invader26 wrote:
My B-25 had the DV windscreen . I think it looks best. The piece of armour plate screwed in below the DV window.

I don't think any B-25's are flying with that done. Looks the part.


I think you are right. I haven't seen a flying example with the armor. In fact most of the "top tier" flying restorations don't have the 3 piece windscreen, clear or otherwise. Seems like it would cause a bit of a blind spot on approach, but maybe not, I've never flown a B-25 from the left seat, or landed a B-25 but it gives the appearance of a bit of a hindrance.

The only examples I can recall seeing the windscreen armor on were the Air Zoo example and the New England Air Museum examples. Both H models with the Air Zoo example being dressed up like a J. Of course both are static.

Ryan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:05 pm
Posts: 303
Location: Oklahoma City, OK.
Nevermind....

_________________
Civis Aerius Sum

I am a citizen of the Air

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:19 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
How along was this B-25 in rebuild/restoration?
Nose art no Nose Art, either way, she is beautiful. :supz: I wonder how often or if she will be flown again.

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:18 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
FHC flies everything they have with two notable exceptions due to rarity. They don't fly the Ki-43 nor the DORA, the F6F is i/w to return to flight status after lots of years as a static bird and the Butcher Bird should be test flying locally in the next week I'd wager. The 2 seat A6M is elsewhere on KPAE hopefully also getting readied for flight. And, of course, P.A. also has the airworthy Mig-29 to upset the luddites in Mukilteo.

And with HFF across the field having B-25D 'GRUMPY' we can expect some 'interesting' flying weekends this Summer, last year between FHC's P-47 and HFF's F7F, & F8F one Saturday was R-2800 day and it was sweet!

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 7:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:56 am
Posts: 843
The DV window is a non problem when flying and in actual fact I experienced major smoke in the cockpit after an engine failure on my aircraft and we were going to pull the window if it got worse. Opening the side windows only draws more smoke in....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:37 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
The Inspector wrote:
FHC flies everything they have with two notable exceptions due to rarity. They don't fly the Ki-43 nor the DORA

Cool - does that mean the Me163 will be air tested soon? :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:43 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
Mike wrote:
The Inspector wrote:
FHC flies everything they have with two notable exceptions due to rarity. They don't fly the Ki-43 nor the DORA

Cool - does that mean the Me163 will be air tested soon? :shock:



T-stoff? Check.

C-stoff? Check.

Flieger?

Flieger...?


Bueller?

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 4:22 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Mike, as soon as you finish your cross country in their Fi-103 you're #1 for 163 training!! :supz:

Maybe you could start by becoming the gunner on one of the Fleigerkannon 88's they have (and shoot too) Black powder and coffee creamer-

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Larry Kraus and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group