Should I admit any personal preference ? Or should I be unbiased ??
I really like the 447th BG scheme of SCHEHERAZDE ~ 122 missions ~ well documented ~ color pics ~ video of the 447th on youtube .....
But lets focus on mustangdriver's comment .....
Quote:
I actually like the current scheme
I've spent quite a bit of time going thru every B-17 / 8th Air Force book in my library at home looking at the history of the real Mary Alice and I found this ~
Quote:
The choice of Mary Alice came about through the IWM's wish to give the restored aircraft a protective coat of paint, rather than leave it in natural finish
it had when delivered from the Douglas plant and kept throughout its flying life.
B-17G-95-DLs had the so-called Cheyenne tail gun position but this was not introduced into production while Fortresses were still receiving camouflage finish.
Most 8th Air Force olive drab and neutral gray coated B-17Gs with Cheyenne tail turrets had been modified in the USA or UK, but they were few in number.
On request, the writer produced photographs showing two such aircraft - the 401st Group's Mary Alice and the 96th Groups "Reluctant Dragon".
IWM chose the former. The history of the real Mary Alice was unknown at this stage but when it was investigated, it showed there could have been no more
fitting choice to represent the rugged dependability of the B-17
Source : Roger Freeman ~ the "Mary Alice" chapter ( Page 58 ) published in the "B-17 Flying Fortress Special" by Flypast in July 1999.
Mary Alice flew some 98 missions ~ but we keep finding the same 5 or 6 photos of it ~ taken just after the mission of July 13th 1944 when the tail was shredded.
The aircraft led a charmed life and was repeatedly damaged and repaired. And kept flying missions. So it's story tells of the bravery of the aircrew that flew
it and the dogged determination of the ground echelon in repairing it over and over again. Here's some examples .....
Quote:
A month passed before the Fortress was ready to leave. [ RAF Beccles ] A mobile repair and reclamation team had installed a new unpainted fin and rudder,
right stabilizer and elevator, new tail gun position, plus several patches on the left wing and bomb bay.
Source : Roger Freeman ~ the "Mary Alice" chapter ( Page 59 ) published in the "B-17 Flying Fortress Special" by Flypast in July 1999.
Quote:
The ground crew proudly pointed out that until her 66th mission on November 21st, when an oil line broke, she had never had to turn back for mechanical failure
and she had also survived some of the most punishing missions the Group had undertaken.
Source : B-17 Fortress At War ~ By Roger Freeman ~ Page 101
Quote:
The mobile repair men arrived to make Mary Alice airworthy again. The writer chanced to see the aircraft while this work was in progress and can confirm
that were nearly as many silver areas as camouflaged.
Source : Roger Freeman ~ the "Mary Alice" chapter ( Page 60 ) published in the "B-17 Flying Fortress Special" by Flypast in July 1999.
So ..... Mary Alice would be a fitting scheme on every level. And it would look stunning with a silver tail with the 401st BG's yellow diagonal fin marking.
But so far we've not seen conclusive published photographs of how it looked towards the end of it's flying career.
Painting it ~ as it was previously ~ would now seem to me as not being the fitting tribute that it could and ought to be for
all the people that worked on her and flew her.
If anyone out there knows of unpublished images of Mary Alice towards the end end of her combat history ~ now's the time to speak up !
_________________
Blue Skies .....
Peter
Consolidated by US state ~ see if there's a heavy bomber tour stop coming to an airport near you ......
http://www.bomberflight.infoWarbirdapps on facebook ~ every day a new image from my personal journey thru the world of warbirds .....
https://www.facebook.com/Warbirdapps