Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:47 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
But Speedy,...there ARE people out there who think Brad is pretty ! :axe: :drink3:

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:12 am
Posts: 924
Location: Just outside of Grosse Ile N.A.S.
I really never expected them to last beyond this yeart anyhow, and was expecting them to go back to their original schemes at their next paint cycle. The argument is kinda pointless, I'm sure the CoNA schemes were a great recruiting tool for the Navy and a point of interest and pride for the public.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Northern VA, USA
I wouldn't mind seeing the result of the CoNA birds being put back into their "normal" maintenance/corrosion control schedules without the schemes being changed. Afterall, the aircraft that they're painted to represent were operational aircraft with schemes subject to weathering and wear/tear that only looked as "fresh" as the CoNA aircraft do right after they were painted ... and then never again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:02 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Capt. Rich Dann gave a great presentation about the CoNA scheme project at the recent IPMS National Convention (inspired me to buy an F-18 kit and some decals for the tri-color camo Hornet..and I usually build strictly WWII stuff!) He said he had to work with unit commanders and maintenance crews to get the job done, and some were more enthusiastic than others. Even so, they ended up getting about half again as many aircraft painted as they had originally planned (they were hoping for 18, and got 27!)

One little bit of trivia I thought was interesting: ond of the CoNA P-3s was painted in the markings of the PBY that found the Japanese fleet at Midway. The Orion was actually stationed in Japan at the time, and was painted by the Japanese! Even so, they were enthiastic about the project and took great pride in the job.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:36 pm
Posts: 21
Hey, I'm new here. I spent 8 years in the Navy as an airframes and hydraulics technician on the mighty F14 with VF211 (sadly now flying the "puny" F18 :D ) and I agree with the Gent who could see both sides. The "retro" schemes look very cool but are a pain to keep that way. On the Tomcat, as well as all the other aircraft that had the gray TPS paint, after two weeks at sea they looked like crap. The corrosion guys had their hands full maintaining the paint and preserving all of the scratches and scapes. Heavy tool boxes were hard on paint. I think the scheduled interval for washes was every two weeks. It washed the salt spray off of the aircraft but not much else. The oil, hydraulic fluid stains, and boot sole scuffs tended to be difficult to remove.

I remember VF211 had a Tomcat that was painted slightly different than the rest of our birds. All squadron markings were painted in dark "engine gray" on the newest buno number bird we had. This is somewhat in keeping with Navy squadrons from the mid 70s to the mid 80s before the overall gray TPS schemes began to show up. All of the squadrons had a "CAG bird" in which all of the markings were in full color. Some were VERY colorful. My personal fav was VF111 Sundowners CAG bird with the sun burst on the tail.

Anyway I think the current retro schemes are cool....while they last.

Barry


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:44 am
Posts: 847
Location: DAL glidepath
Since it was referenced above that there were 27 of these aircraft painted, does anyone have a list with pics and what the scheme is meant to represent historically? I've tried to collect some pics of all the ones I could, but I doubt I've seen 27. Anyone?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:38 am
Posts: 144
Location: Ferndale, WA
StangStung wrote:
Since it was referenced above that there were 27 of these aircraft painted, does anyone have a list with pics and what the scheme is meant to represent historically? I've tried to collect some pics of all the ones I could, but I doubt I've seen 27. Anyone?

NO kidding- I'd like to see that list as well!!! I only have pictures of what I saw at NAS Whidbey Island last month, plus a few random ones from airliners.net and elsewhere.

_________________
StudeDave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:45 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Liberator wrote:
How do you warbird enthusiasts feel about this heritage issue been spoken like this within the US Navy .?....poor lack of modern day understanding of where they have come from? or is it legimate reasons to see the schemes go?


Maybe it's that folks in the military today are serving at a very high operations tempo in the midst of a 10-year war.

There ARE a lot more important things to be considered.

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:47 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Speedy wrote:
Yeah, we go to war in THAT. THIS is a real warbird. It's a workhorse. It's function over form to take it to the bad guy.

That shiny P-51 over there? VERY COOL airplane...but that's not what they looked like when THEY were real warbirds either. They were a little on the dirty and worn side too.


+1000

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 4:27 pm
Posts: 76
Location: England
Quote:
Since it was referenced above that there were 27 of these aircraft painted, does anyone have a list with pics and what the scheme is meant to represent historically? I've tried to collect some pics of all the ones I could, but I doubt I've seen 27. Anyone?

The first 18 or so to be painted (which are mostly the trainers) are pictured here along with details of the scheme backgrounds and a list of the ones which hadn't been finished at that time: http://www.hrana.org/documents/HeritagePaintProject.pdf

_________________
Tony Andrews


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:44 am
Posts: 847
Location: DAL glidepath
Thanks for that Tony! Now I can work on the checklist. With the pics included there, along with the list of aircraft left to be painted, there's your 27.

Much appreciated!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:38 am
Posts: 144
Location: Ferndale, WA
StangStung wrote:
Thanks for that Tony! Now I can work on the checklist. With the pics included there, along with the list of aircraft left to be painted, there's your 27. Much appreciated!

Yes- Thanks very very much Tony!!! I appreciated that as well.

I have a few pictures of one of the P3s, two or three of the Hornets, and the Prowler that
I took when I went to NAS Whidbey's 'show' that wasn't. I also found a few on the 'net.
Let me know what you might like to see, and I'll see about getting copies to you 'StangStung'.

_________________
StudeDave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 4:27 pm
Posts: 76
Location: England
Just found a later version of the document: http://www.public.navy.mil/airfor/centennial/Documents/Heritage%20Paint%20Project.pdf

_________________
Tony Andrews


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: raconnel and 293 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group