Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:45 am
Wed Sep 28, 2011 11:32 am
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:Roger. That's why I carefully referred to you as "Naval Aviators." You guys are much admired by me.
Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:29 pm
That's why I carefully referred to you as "Naval Aviators."
You guys are much admired by me.
Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:44 pm
Jack Cook wrote:That's why I carefully referred to you as "Naval Aviators."
freak'in bus driver
You guys are much admired by me.
I think I just swallowed my tongue
Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:46 pm
Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:55 pm
Jack Cook wrote:I napped a lot!
Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:03 pm
Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:46 pm
Jack Cook wrote:Hey-hey-hey......I wasn't there for that!
Stupid people and their stupid decisions. P-3 minus AO = no one to blame anymore
Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:50 pm
Speedy wrote:Stephan Wilkinson wrote:(guys, you use a motor to start the engine...)
Everybody involved in this business knows that motors are electric and engines are IC, but just as Naval Aviators call carriers "boats" even though they know they're ships--it's a kind of back-handed attempt to show they're pilots and are above such silly maritime differentiations--EVERYBODY in the car-racing business (I'm a pilot but an automotive journalist) calls engines "motors." Calling a racecar's engine "an engine" shows that you're an overly knowledgeable outsider. Strange and silly, but that's the way it is, and pedantically trying to correct them demonstrates the same thing.
Uh...for what it's worth, we're called Naval Aviators because were 'better than pilots'.
Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:39 pm
Paul Krumrei wrote:Us Air Force Jocks call them Flying Squids
Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:57 pm
Like the pilot. TACCO's love blaming the pilot.
Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:12 pm
Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:19 pm
RickH wrote:This thread has degenerated nicely !
Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:22 pm
Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:15 pm
RickH wrote:Trust me, I enjoy watching professionals such as yourselves !