Forgotten Field wrote:What are the elements of a good maintenance program? How do you tweak it up to the point where you have nearly zero error? How do you get past Volunteer issues when it comes to quality control of maintenance? How do you implant experience into institutional standards for maintenance (i.e. manual says 2 left turns but it only works with 2 right turns)?
Most important- what do you use as a benchmark to evaluate your maintenance program? My impression is that in GA, most maintenance done on aircraft happens at annual inspection. I don't think anybody flying what we are interested in here can go that route.
I am asking this in light of the continued news which gets posted here about inauspicious ends to some of these aircraft and a recent experience with the L5. I am not trying to be an FAA investigator (my A&P and IA friends have given me the post-crash stories about that). I am just interested in what the maintenance professionals here have to say about this subject. I'm not looking for the "my major airline carrier does this or my museum does this" answer. What is your "fantasy maintenance" program? Other than Halle Berry bringing you beers between spark plug changes, continually trying to wipe the grease off of her bikini-clad body....
This is a difficult question to reply to,
Mainly from the aspect of where my maintenance experiance has been gotten from, but that aside. There are a huge amount of vairables in any maintenance program. How often does the aircraft fly ? How proficient is the pilot ? What conditions has the aircraft been flown in....ie..alot of wind, rough landings etc... ? Does the aircraft in question have enough "time" flown on it during the course of a typical "airshow" year to warrant more than a couple of 100 hr and a good annual inspection during the year ? How "good" or healthy is the engine ? The components such as the hydraulic, primary fuel and boost pumps, brake system, tires and possibly most important...control cables ? What kind of shape is the prop in from an "on aircraft versus hours" perpsective ?
Most, if not all structural items would normally get adressed on an "on condition" basis during the annual. In a perfect world also, every time an owner wants his plane done the ready availibility of parts and spares wouldn't be a problem, but for Warbirds it is HUGE issue due to cost and availibility. Is the owner willing to or more importantly able to procure the parts as needed ? I am not attempting to hit any nerves here, but I do or rather have known Warbird owners who have been kind of stingy when it came to parts issues versus their enjoyment of flying the aircraft. But, it is still THEIR aircraft and they can do with it as they see fit. And according to the FAR's, last time I checked it was still the Owner/Operators responsability of the maintenance on the aircraft in question.
With regard to parts....I can cite one example...if a guy owned a T-6 and for some reason blew the engine, the cost involved for a "new" rebuilt one was (last time I checked) around $20,000.00 to $29,000.00. That is ALOT of money to come up with in one chunk. And that is just considering a replacement engine for a T-6. Not even wanting to think about the replacement of an R2800, Merlin, or Allison rebuild on a cost basis. And then you start considering the cost of "oddball" engines such as an R2600, R2000, or even something along the lines of an R3350 or bigger.
All of that plays in to the idea of a maintenance program. And what the owner wants to do, after all...it IS his aircraft.
In a perfect world, the annual should cover everything. Afterall...you have the "down time" of the Winter months. And, of course it helps immensely to get a guy with experiance to eyeball the plane.
Zero error is impossible. From the day that aircraft left the build up hangar the clock was ticking on it. How do you get experiance imparted to the volunteer group ? That is a REAL tough question, having been around ALOT of the so called volunteers who regard the guys who do the work with disdain. Especially when it comes the time to get a ride or wear a jumpsuit that says "I belong Mueum X" on it. Alot of folks are there expressly for that ego boost. But when it comes to fixing things....RIGHT....they somehow dissapear. But when the airshow is "on" they are magically there again and want to tell you how and when things get done.....Okay..enough soapbox on my part.
Imparting experiance to anyone is tough.....but if some folks want to take the time to learn and listen....it happens. And the folks who run the whole show know that. Finding that person to impart the experiance and more importantly...have both parties learn to TRUST each other will be a huge boost in any maintenance program...voluntary or otherwise.
Anyone have any thoughts ?? I'd love to have this topic continue.
Paul