OK
I give.
Having been involved in well over 100 warbird restorations since the 1970's, I can't say I have ever painted an aircraft with a brush nor in my backyard. Frankly, I don't think I know of anyone who has.
I have worked on Gold and Silver Wrench warbird winners at Oshkosh and do know the difference between a good paint job and a poor one.
I was attempting to provide guidance to volunteers to help with the daunting task of working on a North Star. I also was atempting to point out that acid etching is not a must. Aircraft were painted for many decades (By Douglas and everyone else) without using this technique.
When it comes to painting aircraft, there are many things to consider. I know if I was to consider painting my aircraft (Currently polished) I would in no way consider acid etching. I can also say that 95% of aircraft that I have been involved in painting have been - it is an excellant method for paint prep.
Having now painted four static museum aircraft with 'house paint', I can say in my experiance it does not cause corrosion. These were all properly preped, primed with zinc chromate and painted. Some prefer the authentic warbird matt style finishes, this is a very effective method of acheiving this and meets museum guidelines for finishes. More likely corrosion is due to poor preparation and subsequent neglect which will occur no matter what finish you use.
I believe the volunteers working on the North Star project will be following the guidelines and policy of the National Aviation Museum. Likely acid etching would not be allowed under museum policy as most museum aircraft are restored using period techniques, materials and finishes. Because of this, I think it unlikely they will be painting it silver either!
Dave