Lt51506 wrote:
For what it's worth, I attempted to get a drive going to have this "art" removed. After a few conversations with the Art Academy and the artist, it was pretty clear they were of shallow minds and non-sympathetic to it's display in CDF colors. One of the artist's complaints was the amount of time it took a half dozen people or more to "hand sand" most of the paint off. I'm sorry, I don't buy that one for a minute....Klean-strip has worked pretty fast for me in the past. A bare aluminum airframe wouldn't have pi**ed me off. Leaving it in identifying paint and markings went way over the line as far as art is concerned.
After that, I contacted CalFire (Admin's and the legal department), got some horrified reactions from several other groups and some letters written and sent. To make a long story short, unless legal action was taken, the S-2 would remain as it stands. The CDF legal eagles were willing to make some noise, but budgetary issues prevented them from doing much more than that.
All said and done, I did get two free passes to see this for myself. I kindly thanked them - but said if I came to see it, I'd be driving a large tow truck. That, my friends, was the end of that.
Tom Janney
Tom, thanks for sharing your point of view. I agree that is is distasteful to leave it in the markings it wore while fighting fires. Perhaps the "artist" should have put some of their own artwork on the plane. I imagine there would be outrage if the artist had done something similar with a firetruck.
In general as an airplane turn art project it dosent bother me. I like the idea of the general public seeing some aircraft related art.
_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive
http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/