Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 9:01 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:33 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
aerovin wrote:
I don't think this FAA NPRM is aimed at warbirds and if one reads through the documents located at the NPRM site (http://dms.dot.gov/search/document.cfm?documentid=369870&docketid=14825) it is apparent the FAA is addressing concerns certifying new build production aircraft.
Where it is aimed matters not, where it falls matters a lot!

Regardless of the intent, a bureaucrats later interpretation can be broad and sweeping. Just look at how much effort was required to address the demil bill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:36 pm
Posts: 73
:shock: Darn Glen! I guess I let the cat out of the bag on that one! I'll be calling you about a cut down Ham standard for it also.

Mr. Mudge
Again as I read this rule it affects NEWLY certificated aircraft in the standard category. These are basically NEWLY built aircraft from spare/surplus parts which have never been registered because they didnt exist and were not produced by the factory and are now needing certification to fly. Examples of these would be N451D which is a P-51D and the "manufacturer" is NorthAmerican/Baker and N151HR which is also a 51 and the "manufacturer is NorthAmerican/Odegaard. I am not quite sure how the LIMITED category aircraft are affected with these new rules. I am certain that the STANDARD category aircraft are now facing issues as Pete Jones from Air Repair can no longer build "new" birddogs from his extensive spares without TC holder approval. I think he's built like nine birddogs like this in the past few years. Beautiful machines! I hope I've explained my previous post a bit better.
Cheers!
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:52 am 
Offline
Pvt. Joker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 1012
Location: Location: Location!
I think this happened with the Bell 47 a few decades ago; more flying than were produced by the factory.

_________________
Image
Commemorative Air Force
Experimental Aircraft Association
Warbirds of America

What are you waiting for? Join us!

Best way to contact me- email my last name @gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:19 pm
Posts: 355
Location: Near the home of the Cleveland National Air Races!
Question?

Can you still build and regester new from old stock and not have themin the Standard or limited category if you can't get the TC holder's approval?
Would it be in the experimental category?


Kenn

_________________
May all your bent wings be F2G Corsairs!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:12 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
I had the pleasure of reading a book by a local T-33 pilot this weekend. He has tons of hours and has even attended the Test Pilot School at Edwards.

As a jet warbird owner he writes that several years ago at a jet warbird convention a senior FAA official attended to talk with the group.

When this official was asked who came up with the rules and regs the FAA produces he stated (paraphrased) "a bunch of newly minted Yale/Harvard/Wharton grad with JDs/MBAs or MPA degrees who probably have not been on a plane smaller than a 737"

Theres the answer to this madness we live with :lol:

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:28 am
Posts: 103
Location: WI
Stoney wrote:
What's the number of this?


Document FAA-2003-14825-61


http://dms.dot.gov/search/document.cfm? ... etid=14825


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:14 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
I have a bunch of old receipts from Aircraft Spruce for nuts and bolts. Is that sufficient evidence that I started building this new airplane soon enough? How do they know I didn't buy the hardware for that particular airplane?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 226 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group