Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:54 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 58
I agree the reporting is all over the map. I have read pretty much every article published and from trying to pick through all the crap I have come to the conclusion they have found two separate crates in two different locations. One is full of muddy water which will take time to pump out, and the other is beneath cables and piping which is hampering their efforts in retrieving it. So this reporting there are no aircraft is premature and sensationalism. One thing I found interesting is Mr Cundall says they are looking in the wrong place. Makes you wonder who is leading this dig and if he is being pushed to the side.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:01 am
Posts: 54
You've got the archeologists saying there's no evidence, but being archeologists they are in their field of study. Probably because they've found that what they thought were Spitfires were just buried runway segments.

Next you've got the eyewitnesses who aren't taken seriously by the archeologists.

Then you've got the Russian who apparently threw Cundall under the bus. Then you've got the high profile nature of the venture. It's a fiasco. It seems a little over the top to expect the Spitfires to be in good condition before they are found too. It would be better to do such a dig under a low profile if possible and keep it open ended not expecting any results until some are found. Expecting results beforehand has the potential of being disasterous.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:55 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Northwest Ohio
Whats the old saying: Hope for the best, prepare for the worst! :shock:

_________________
A&P/I.A., A.A.S./Aviation Maintenance technology
Warbird salvage/recovery
One day I'll get that P-40!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:18 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
Mike Halbrook wrote:
It does make you wonder a bit about some of the other stuff that gets presented as "news".


Every single time I have heard or read a news story where I was close to the story, something was wrong with the report. Wrong facts, omitted information, "experts" who don't know anything. I assume all news stories are that way (Which means you can't trust any of 'em.).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:28 am
Posts: 165
Location: Wisconsin, USA
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh come on!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-art ... -snag.html

Now, there are no Spitfires...... WHAT???
http://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-art ... lanes.html

Archaeologists believe no Spitfires buried in Burma..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21074699

This dream may have just become a nightmare, wake me when this is over.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:10 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
Another article....

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 57710.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 9:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:07 pm
Posts: 620
Location: S. Texas
SeptRepair wrote:
I have come to the conclusion they have found two separate crates in two different locations. One is full of muddy water which will take time to pump out, and the other is beneath cables and piping which is hampering their efforts in retrieving it.


Ummmmmmmm, they do make pumps now-a-days in order to pump the water out of certain areas containing too much water.

Let's see here, assuming the crates are 30 feet long, 20 feet wide and 10 feet tall.............that should therefore contain about 44,820 gallons of water.

Lets purchase a cheap old 1/6 HP 3000 GPH water pump from the local hardware store..........I think in one long day we should be able to pump that baby dry.

Why haven't they emptied the water from the crate yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 58
Who knows why they cant pump out. Maybe they dont have the equipment there to do it quite yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
Quote:
Why haven't they emptied the water from the crate yet?


If a 45,000-gallon crate is at the bottom of a 30,000,000-gallon lake, it's going to require pumping out the entire lake.

Not that this crate is literally at the bottom of a lake, but it apparently is under the level of the local water table, so whatever water you pump out of the crate is simply replaced by more water. They could be pumping forever unless they somehow get it out and lift it above the water table.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:01 am
Posts: 54
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:

Quote:
If a 45,000-gallon crate is at the bottom of a 30,000,000-gallon lake, it's going to require pumping out the entire lake.

Not that this crate is literally at the bottom of a lake, but it apparently is under the level of the local water table, so whatever water you pump out of the crate is simply replaced by more water. They could be pumping forever unless they somehow get it out and lift it above the water table.


Still not quite true. You would have to pump it out at a rate more quickly than it flows in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:11 pm
Posts: 64
Location: Vancouver, BC
HawkerTempestMKII wrote:
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:

Quote:
If a 45,000-gallon crate is at the bottom of a 30,000,000-gallon lake, it's going to require pumping out the entire lake.

Not that this crate is literally at the bottom of a lake, but it apparently is under the level of the local water table, so whatever water you pump out of the crate is simply replaced by more water. They could be pumping forever unless they somehow get it out and lift it above the water table.


Still not quite true. You would have to pump it out at a rate more quickly than it flows in.


A) Fingers crossed that something is there.

B) If there are crates and they are below the water table, best not to pump the water out of the crates or they will most likely collapse.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:22 am
Posts: 536
Location: Tampa, Florida
Why would they put crates filled with runway segments underground...

_________________
My racing will fund my warbirding. Hopefully...

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/ChristopherDeshongRacing
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChrisDRacing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:41 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
when they dug up the wreck of the steamship Arabia in Missouri back in the late 80s, they had about a dozen pumps going non-stop around the site pumping tens of thousands of gallons an hour to keep the hole (somewhat) dry. When the pumps were shut off after the dig was finished, the hole filled back up with water in a matter of hours.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
Quote:
You would have to pump it out at a rate more quickly than it flows in.


Good luck with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
Quote:
Why would they put crates filled with runway segments underground...


Nobody said the PSP was in crates. And one reason you'd bury the steel planks is that there'd be thousands of them in stacks alongside the runway, if you'd cleared them off the runway in order to pave it. That's exactly where you don't want them in case an airplane groundloops or veers off the runway for some reason. Bury 'em.


Last edited by Stephan Wilkinson on Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Lynn Allen and 260 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group