Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 6:07 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:01 am
Posts: 54
I think this counts as a warbird, since it had a swastika on it..

Saw this on yahoo news..

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/mys ... 32922.html

So they really finally solved it? Really? Wasn't it obvious? H2 gas is extremely flammable, and static electricity for the spark, duh?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
I thought they proved years ago that it was the dope/paint they used on the nylon that was what caught fire. Hydrogen explodes instantaneously (pops, if you will), but the dope was essentially made up of the same components of gunpowder, and that's why it was essentially a 'slow-burn' fire that started at the back and moved forward, as opposed to it all going up at once. The hydrogen bags did explode, but that isn't the fire that you see burning in the film and pictures.

Oh well.

Maybe that same team can go help out TIGHAR and they can come to the conclusion that Amelia mysteriously disappeared.

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:01 am
Posts: 54
From my chemistry lab in college, I know hydrogen burns and ignites in a flame just like the hindenburgh did. Dope and paint is used on many aircraft and that hasn't happened before as far as I know..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 683
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
I heard a news story recently about an Australian businessman who plans to waste (I mean spend) his fortune building an exact replica of the Titanic ocean liner in China. (I guess he figures that he can't take it with him when he goes.) Supposedly they're already booking reservations - whereas the most expensive accomodations on the original went for the equivalent of $70,000.00, the ones on the new Titanic II will go for more like $1,000,000.00 per trip.

My first thought was to wonder if they have plans to build a Hindenberg II or build a new spa and resort near Pompeii in Italy! :shock:

_________________
“To invent the airplane is nothing. To build one is something. But to fly is everything!” - Otto Lilienthal

Natasha: "You got plan, darling?"
Boris: "I always got plan. They don't ever work, but I always got one!"

Remember, any dummy can be a dumb-ass...
In order to be a smart-ass, you first have to be "smart"
and to be a wise-ass, you actually have to be "wise"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 3:40 pm
Posts: 223
Location: State of confusion
I guess you never heard of Nitrile Dope.

Hydrogen only burns (like many things) when mixed with an oxidizer. This accounts for the "slow burn rate". Although, (approx) 36 seconds ain't that slow to consume over 7 million cubic feet of gas. The thing was burning as fast as it could breathe.

_________________
Expert:
Ex: Former.
Spurt: A drip under pressure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:01 am
Posts: 54
No, hydrogen burns when exposed to a spark. We played with it in chem lab.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 3:40 pm
Posts: 223
Location: State of confusion
I think you should demand a refund on your chem-lab education.

No oxidizer, no fire, no kidding.

_________________
Expert:
Ex: Former.
Spurt: A drip under pressure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:19 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
T-28mike wrote:
I guess you never heard of Nitrile Dope.

Neither have I! Maybe you mean nitrate?

Quote:
Nitrocellulose with nitrogen below 12.3 percent is used for lacquers, coatings and inks. Nitrogen content above 12.6 percent is considered an explosive.


The problem with nitrate dope and cotton fabric is that it WILL support combustion. I knew a guy that was banner towing in a Tri-Pacer that caught fire. By the time he landed on a street in Los Angeles, all the fabric on the fuselage was gone. He was very lucky to have survived! http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief ... 9617&key=1


Last edited by bdk on Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:01 am
Posts: 54
T-28 Mike:

Quote:
I think you should demand a refund on your chem-lab education.

No oxidizer, no fire, no kidding.


Wikipedia:
Quote:
Hydrogen gas (dihydrogen or molecular hydrogen)[12] is highly flammable and will burn in air at a very wide range of concentrations between 4% and 75% by volume.[13] The enthalpy of combustion for hydrogen is −286 kJ/mol:[14]


hmm, you must be right and the whole world is wrong! I am impressed!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:43 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
The Hindenburg was not covered with normal doped fabric, but rather the fabric coating was a mixture of nitrile rubber and aluminium powder.
This happens to be basically the same thing that was used as fuel the Shuttle's solid boosters, so while the hydrogen did burn, and can be seen to be escaping from the burst cells and burning over the envelop, it was not the primary cause or fuel of the fire.

Apparently the Zeppelin company had already determined the danger of the coating, and had reformulated it with addition of a bronze powder acting as a retardant. This formulation was slated for the Hindenburg's sister ship Graf Zeppelin II, and for the Hindenburg herself at the rest refit.

It was politically expedient to quash that report, and point the finger at the US for denying Germany the helium the ship had been designed for in the first place.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 3:40 pm
Posts: 223
Location: State of confusion
BDK, sorry, Nitrile = Nitrate.... I've got o-rings on the brain.

Chris,
Read your own wiki-link "Hydrogen gas (dihydrogen or molecular hydrogen)[12] is highly flammable and will burn in air at a very wide range of concentrations between 4% and 75% by volume.[13] The enthalpy of combustion for hydrogen is −286 kJ/mol:[14]

Fire requires three elements to sustain itself. Fuel, Oxidizer and Heat. Take away any one, fire goes out (does not start).

_________________
Expert:
Ex: Former.
Spurt: A drip under pressure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:47 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Chris,

Air is the oxidizer and hydrogen is the fuel. I'm not sure I understand your point?

In the case of nitrate dope and cotton, the cotton is a fuel (as would be any elemental hydrogen nearby), but I think the nitrocellulose dope acts as both a fuel and oxidizer when ignited- like a solid rocket fuel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:51 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
shrike wrote:
The Hindenburg was not covered with normal doped fabric, but rather the fabric coating was a mixture of nitrile rubber and aluminium powder.

So Mike, it sounds like you were right after all, there is nitrile dope! :lol:

As silly as these discussions can get at times there is still a lot to be learned.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:05 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2636
I believe the Hindenburg was plastic.......HELLO!

Image

_________________
45-47=-2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Pacific Northwest USA, via North Florida
And to think, the US learned this lesson fifteen years earlier when the semi-rigid airship Roma went down in Virginia, ending the Hydrogen era for the United States.

_________________
Life member, 91st BG Memorial Association
Owner, 1944 Willys MB #366014
Former REMF (US Army, O3)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group