shrike wrote:
DC3R4DC47 wrote:
The Hurricane is as usual unsung, the Hurricane squadrons shot down more ME-109s,than the Spits did during the Battle,as well as more bombers, though outclassed as a front rank fighter by '41, in the late summer early fall 1940 it was the best fighter out there by the only metric that really counts, victories. and yes I know,there were more Hurris,than Spits, but still.
By some accounts the Hurricane was a better gun platform than a Spitfire, and that, as much as if not more than raw performance or aerobatic agility, makes a fighter effective.
The Hurricane really was the right airplane at the right time. It's fabric covered fuselage was difficult for cannon shell to seriously damage. The RAF maintenance crews in 1940 were more familiar with the Hurricane's more traditional construction than the Spitfire's monocoque design, so a damaged Hurricane was more likely to not only return to duty, but to do so faster than the Spitfire. It's wide track landing gear made it easy to handle on the grass strips that dominated the 11 Group area.
It's performance would eventually relegate it to secondary theaters and ground attack duties as more modern and better performing planes came into service, but during the summer of 1940, it was the right tool for the job, and as a team, "Hurry and Spit" could not be beat.