This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Wed Feb 05, 2014 12:52 pm
Not beinging able to read Chinese - it seems a bit fanciful and hopeful on the part of the Chinese successes against the Japanese. But maybe thats a quick judgement? Cool find none the less!
Tom P.
Wed Feb 05, 2014 1:57 pm
An amazing posting!!!!! the artwork is superb, the captioning is intriguing and it's a treat to see how much mileage Jack Northrop and Jerry Vultee got out of the GAMMA and the V-1 designs by just sliding stuff around.
DANKE'
Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:35 pm
Thx Bill, your welcome. The B-10 was also used by the CAF early in the conflict with Japan.

Martin B-12 at March Field Nov 19, 1935 (U.S. Air Force photo)

Martin B-10B's (U.S. Air Force photo)

Martin B-10B cockpit (U.S. Air Force photo)

Martin B-10B cockpit (U.S. Air Force photo)
Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:54 pm
Ever wonder why the control wheels on Martin and Bell airplanes looked like they were 'off the shelf' from TOW MOTOR baggage tugs or American BANTAMS?
Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:12 pm
Great stuff, my wife is Taiwanese and was reading the Chinese over my shoulder while I read the English. She got very upset by what she read. She was also saddened. Huge amounts of civilians died. To this day the Japanese have hardly apologized. I read an article just the other day in the LA Times were the Japanese felt they won the war with China, but lost the war to the West. To them it is a victory they are still proud of.
Interestingly, the hand written notes on the bottom of some pages were explaining where a certain commander was located in another book. Whoever owned this book was in the CAF and recognized the people mentioned.
Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:36 am
Adam my apologies for upsetting your wife. No intention of causing grief or Ill will. The Chinese people suffered tremendously, as did so many others. As much as it is still very painful for some to reflect on those horrible years of world conflict, it's also important never to forget the sacrifice and suffering the Chinese people endured and to never forget their heroism and bravery.
I'm very proud to have been able to post a small bit of China's history from a time largely forgotten by this part of the world IMO. The Chinese people I'm sure still have quite vivid memories of this tragic part of their vast history and as I'm sure they would never forget this history, I feel we should at the very least show the Chinese respect by remembering as well.
I sincerely hope your wife will accept my apology.
Mark
Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:50 am
Mark, No ill will received. My wife accepts the fact that it happened. Nothing you did. The Chinese largely mismanaged the war. Chiang Kai Shek was trained and schooled in Japan and was basically a Japanese pacifist. Madame Chiang was all the carisma at getting other world leaders to try and help, but her husband largely held his best troops in reserve to fight Mao's communist. Churchill never trusted him and urged Roosevelt not to either. Chiang never really understood that the Japanese were not his friends. This is even evident in the book. The chapter where the Chinese bombed the Japanese with leaflets. Communist were seen as the larger threat.
No one should forget that the Chinese were involved in fighting the Japanese for years before WWII actually started with little or no help.
Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:15 pm
No question that book is full-on propaganda. Much of war history has been clouded by these kinds of documents which are taken as well researched fact, which they are not.
Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:35 pm
bdk wrote:No question that book is full-on propaganda. Much of war history has been clouded by these kinds of documents which are taken as well researched fact, which they are not.
Although I agree with much of your post as a whole, I'd love to have you point out a few specifics regarding your remarks towards
this book. Not trying to put you on any sort of spot bdk, just curious if there is a specific area you have in mind as being
full-on propaganda. The brief research I have done concerning a few sections in this book has proven to be
somewhat authentic history. Again yes I see forms of propaganda and embellished history, full-on? not so sure. That's just IHO though.
Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:43 pm
The P40E flying in New Zealand, (41-25158 - ex NZ3009), which I thought, was painted in "yet another AVG" scheme, is actually painted in the markings of Chinese fighter ace, Xu Hua Jiang.
This aircraft 88/663/P-11151 was one of 27 P 40E's delivered to China in early 1943. It has an inscription in Chinese characters on the nose which is "Tai Gong Lin" which translates as ""By order of a respected senior person". This phrase goes back in Chinese history to a famous Prime Minister in the Zhou Dynasty (1050 to 256 BC), and illustrates a difference in Chinese verse American thinking. When American pilots told Xu Hua Jiang that they painted the names of their wives or mothers or girlfriends on their aeroplanes, he thought it better to acknowledge Chinese history on his plane.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.