|
Hi all
Many of you here on this forum will recall my questions and research regarding my own P-39 Project. after alot of book reading, archives collecting followed by late nights etc, I managed to identify my Cobra. As a result of all this research I managed to translate the Bell construction number sequence for the early contracts and convert those to corresponding US serial numbers. After my story appeared in the Classic Wings magazine I was fortunate enough to receive several requests for assistance in identifying other P-39 remains. One such collection of parts, which is nothing more than the twisted and scorched remains of a P-39 that has obviously lost the fight with gravity, these parts would hardly fill the space in my 6x4 ute tray (Pick up for our US friends). Nevertheless, the request was made to try and identify the remains.
My first reaction was 'why bother'. I try to stick to my purist beliefs that an aircrafts identity is something more than an ID plate. I have argued many times before that something substantial should remain before an ID can be claimed. In relation to the P-39, the most dominat feature is the roll over section, which also houses the ID plates etc. If these are missing then I usually look for other identifying features. So I commenced my research into this pile of P-39 remains, eventually discovering a series of numbers not unlike those I located on my own Cobra. Armed with this information I commenced to reverse engineer the construction numbering process. I eventually settled on the US serial number of 41-7119. I was quite happy with this discovery because it turns out this particular P-39 is in fact an 'F' model, of which just over 220 were built.
Being the cautious type I am coupled with the formal research training I have undertaken over many years, I decided to confirm or deny my findings by asking another party to conduct some inquiries to check that my methodology was correct. Some time later, after numerous emails and checking and double checking of details, my initial findings were confirmed. The remains I have belonged to 41-7119, being a model 15B F-1-BE USAAF Contract AC15675 13/09/40. What came next was a total surprise.
While checking my own US serial number records I thought I read that this particular P-39 was handed over to the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) as part of a consignment of 20 in 1942. It is not widely known that Australia operated the P-39 albeit for a short period of time, and to my knowledge, all examples of the RAAF P-39 were either returned to the USAAF or were destroyed in accidents. Regardless of this, I had the remains of 41-7119, which corresponds to RAAF P-39 A53-1. This I had to confirm and once again I sought advice and feedback from a very reliable P-39 and RAAF researcher in Gordon Birkett, who by chance has already done a lot of research into P-39's that came to Australia. My discovery was confirmed. 41-7119 was in fact A53-1 but was lost due to an accident when the engined failed in flight with Pilot abandoning a/c over South Luddenham, near Sydney Australia.W/O RAAF 08/03/43.TTHrs 140.55
Further research indicates this aircraft was converted to components and this would explain how the remains came to be collected and stored for over 60 years. Its clear the intention of the original collector was to either add these parts to a pile of others or to sell them for scrap. Either way the remains were saved and are now in my possession, acting as custodian for the true owner who is currently coming to terms with this latest dicovery. While I have mentioned being a purist and personally demanding a high standard of originality, I would concede that I may be some what short sighted when it comes to Warbird identification. The significance of this P-39 and its connection to the RAAF during WW2 can not be ignored and nor should it be, whether its a ute full of scattered parts or a more significant chunk of Airacobra. If I have any say in the final outcome I will lobby to have this become the basis of a restoration to whatever standard. It would be a great thing to achieve getting a P-39 built and being able to say it has some providence to the original and at least, it would be something more than a change in data plates.
I would like to thank G.Birkett for his assistance in this research and hope to be able to update this forum, which I hold in high regard, with decisions and outcomes on this latest significant find.
thanks
Digger
|
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
