Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jul 04, 2025 8:37 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
hbtcoveralls wrote:
Flaps may have been extended for the routine in general, being low speed maneuvering of a high speed aircraft


Yes, used in the Hunter for low speed ACM indeed............but, max speed for flaps is 300kts from what I've read, yet the recommended entry speed for a loop is 450kts.....so hence the ? about being seeing any flap setting at the start of the initial pull-up...??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 3:50 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
IMO, it looks like a barrel roll that accidentally transitioned into a loop at the top. The difference in recovery altitude between a 90 degree nose down attitude and a 60 (or whatever) nose down attitude is substantial.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 2:20 am
Posts: 177
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
A very tragic accident, in what has been a bad year, in all forms of aviation.

Apparently, the pilot (yet to be officially named), survived the crash, and is now fighting for his life.

I think it's a bit early to harp on about the merits of 'vertical maneuvers', 'aggressive flying' 'stop the airshow' etc.

Accidents do, and will happen, aerobatics or no aerobatics.

From the footage I've seen, it seems to that the accident maneuver was not a planned part of the display, and was the result of something which only the pilot would know.

I'm sure the CAA will take review of UK ex-military jet operations, and of course air show safety.

Cheers

Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:46 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1610
Matt Gunsch wrote:
Firebird wrote:
hbtcoveralls wrote:
That is truly terrible, the classic show routine error, mis-judged low level loop trying to correct by hauling back on the stick and in the process exceeding the critical angle of attack. At that altitude there's no way out and you hit the ground pancaking in a deep stall.


Flaps may have dropped/failed prior to loop entry on on initial pull up......and pilot not been aware to allow abandoning manoevure at top of loop....?

Image


it appears that the flaps are down in the this photo as well
Image


Two photos taken on different occasions: I suspect the second was taken during landing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 2:20 am
Posts: 177
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
quemerford wrote:

Two photos taken on different occasions: I suspect the second was taken during landing.


No, it wasn't.

It didn't land,or take off from Shoreham!

The last picture was taken just before the impact.

Having watched several Hunter displays, my understanding is the pilots will use about 20 deg of flaps at stages during their display, to keep speed under control, or during certain maneuvers.

Cheers

Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:52 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1610
Bradburger wrote:
quemerford wrote:

Two photos taken on different occasions: I suspect the second was taken during landing.


No, it wasn't.

It didn't land,or take off from Shoreham!

The last picture was taken just before the impact.

Cheers

Paul


Well unless the drop tanks fell off before it crashed, it was taken sometime else!

Look again.

Edit: it's me who needs to look again - I was sure the externals were absent in the second shot, but I believe they are: it's my habitual distrust of anything in the Daily Mail I'm afraid! Apologies

:drink3:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:04 pm
Posts: 47
fiftycal wrote:
:drink3:

crude and tasteless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 9:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:12 am
Posts: 613
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
quemerford wrote:
Bradburger wrote:
quemerford wrote:

Two photos taken on different occasions: I suspect the second was taken during landing.


No, it wasn't.

It didn't land,or take off from Shoreham!

The last picture was taken just before the impact.

Cheers

Paul


Well unless the drop tanks fell off before it crashed, it was taken sometime else!

Look again.

Edit: it's me who needs to look again - I was sure the externals were absent in the second shot, but I believe they are: it's my habitual distrust of anything in the Daily Mail I'm afraid! Apologies

:drink3:


No your right, both pylons on the left wing in the bottom photo are empty.

_________________
Tyler Pinkerton
Active Member of Air Heritage Inc. of Beaver Falls, PA.
Aircraft: C47B, C-123K, Fairchild F-24, Funk Model B, L-21B, T-28B, T-34B
Static: F-4C Phantom II, F-15A, T-3 Provost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 11:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:56 am
Posts: 843
There are pylons outboard of the tanks. See other pics...

Also not in the landing phase in that pic as no gear down.


A sad day for all...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 6:48 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
quemerford wrote:
Bradburger wrote:
quemerford wrote:

Two photos taken on different occasions: I suspect the second was taken during landing.


No, it wasn't.

It didn't land,or take off from Shoreham!

The last picture was taken just before the impact.

Cheers

Paul


Well unless the drop tanks fell off before it crashed, it was taken sometime else!

Look again.

Edit: it's me who needs to look again - I was sure the externals were absent in the second shot, but I believe they are: it's my habitual distrust of anything in the Daily Mail I'm afraid! Apologies



http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sh ... er-6302974


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 554
Location: LONDON, ONTARIO, CANADA
As part of the overall safety package for conducting a safe air show, ((aside from flying), the event organizers, local police and governments must ensure to keep the roadways surrounding the perimeter of an airfield clear of people and traffic. Sometimes you have to take action to protect people from themselves.

Cheers,

Tom Walsh.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:50 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
TOM WALSH wrote:
As part of the overall safety package for conducting a safe air show, ((aside from flying), the event organizers, local police and governments must ensure to keep the roadways surrounding the perimeter of an airfield clear of people and traffic. Sometimes you have to take action to protect people from themselves.

Cheers,

Tom Walsh.

You are quoting N.American regulations, there is no requirement for a sterile 'box' in Europe. The road passing the field was the major east-west trunk road along the south coast of the UK


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:54 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4527
Location: Dallas, TX
Mike wrote:
TOM WALSH wrote:
As part of the overall safety package for conducting a safe air show, ((aside from flying), the event organizers, local police and governments must ensure to keep the roadways surrounding the perimeter of an airfield clear of people and traffic. Sometimes you have to take action to protect people from themselves.

Cheers,

Tom Walsh.

You are quoting N.American regulations, there is no requirement for a sterile 'box' in Europe. The road passing the field was the major east-west trunk road along the south coast of the UK

It's not exactly sterile around a lot of airshows at US Air Force bases, either.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:36 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:11 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Outer Space
flightsimer wrote:

No your right, both pylons on the left wing in the bottom photo are empty.



Look again closely. You can just see the latter portion of the left drop tank inboard of the outer pylon.

Image

And then there's this photo taken a split second later or from a different angle. Both tanks are there.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 126
Location: Germany
hbtcoveralls wrote:
That is truly terrible, the classic show routine error, mis-judged low level loop trying to correct by hauling back on the stick and in the process exceeding the critical angle of attack. At that altitude there's no way out and you hit the ground pancaking in a deep stall. It hurts even more because I've seen it in person, at a different airshow, and I've seen it so often on video. Condolences to all concerned, maybe it will eventually be time to do away with low level aerobatics at airshows once and for all. Too many good people gone.
Tom Bowers


I was there and he had plenty of height.
The "oh dear" video shows it much better, but he just dropped like the engine had gone out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group